Blue Skies

Bible Prophecy (Truth & Deception)

The Perversion of Mitt Romney



As far as I know Jesus never said anything about gaity, effeminism, lesbians, or homosexuals.

In my opinion they should have the same human rights as others have. I do not think this is a slippery slope. It is common sense.

They should have the right to marry.

Now the bible says we should not eat shellfish…because of the health risks, but it is not one of the Ten Commandments.

Do we say that people who eat shellfish cannot marry?

 We have progressed in this rights struggle for people of different races, creeds and the female gender; we allow them to marry, why stop now?

How does marriage hurt a feminine man or a manly woman?

How does marriage hurt a homosexual or a lesbian?

How would that human right hurt the people in our country?

I think it would make them and us safer.

Did God say he was against homosexuals getting married? Not that I recall but He does not approve of the sexual act because it is unnatural and obviously a health risk.

Because God loves humans he tells them about the health risks ahead of time to help protect them no matter who they are, homosexual or heterosexual. African or Roman. Jewish or Palestinian. American or Russian. ETC.

Obviously, each and all of us are imperfect by His design.

I haven’t seen, neither met, nor known anyone that was perfect.

He created humans with flaws or we would be perfect and since angels fell they must have been imperfect too!

That face sure looks familiar to me!

Cardinal John Patrick Foley

“(November 11, 1935 – December 11, 2011[1][2]) was an American Cardinal of the Roman Catholic Church. From 2007 until 2011, he was Grand Master of theEquestrian Order of the Holy Sepulchre of Jerusalem, an order of knighthood under papal protection, having previously served as President of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications from 1984 to 2007. He was elevated to the cardinalate in 2007. He provided the commentary for the American television viewers of the Christmas Midnight Mass from St Peter’s Basilica, Rome. However, in 2009, he retired from that role after 25 years. The commentary has been taken over by Monsignor Thomas Powers of the Diocese of Bridgeport, Connecticut, an official in the Congregation for Bishops….”

“During his tenure, the Archbishop once sparked outrage in the homosexual community by describing the AIDS pandemic as a “natural sanction for certain types of activities.”[12

Makes you wonder who is responsible?

He also defended the Church’s exclusively male priesthood, once saying, “Jesus clearly did not ordain women to the priesthood, nor did he authorize the Church to do so.”

How would he know?

When angels think they are God. 

Is Cardinal John Patrick Foley a relative to Jackie O?

Compare the picture above with this picture of Jackie

you have to admit they do look similar.

Shape-shifting Jesus described in ancient Egyptian text

“I Come as a Pilgrim”

“The Pope held out a special hand of reconciliation in advance to Catholic homosexuals, who had been outraged at comments made by Archbishop John Foley, the American who heads Vatican communications. Foley had described the scourge of AIDS as a “natural sanction for certain types of activities.” Aboard Spoleto, John Paul said homosexuals “are in the heart of the church,” along with “all people who suffer.” In his first-ever remarks on AIDS, the Pope said, “The church is doing all that is possible to heal and especially to prevent the moral background” of the disease.”

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,147603,00.html#ixzz1v2Q22l8k

^These guys are nuts IMO! They love suffering….keeps them afloat.

Not only homosexuals received the “natural sanction” spoken of by Cardinal John Patrick Foley but so did other people like hemopheliacs. I dated a man who died of aids along with his brother, both were hemopheliacs. Both were happily married and productive men. Before he died he did reveal to me that his investigation of the aids contamination in the blood supply had to do with

the Red Cross, and in particular Elizabeth Dole.

 Weird picture of the Doles and the Connallys

I guess  “natural sanction for certain types of activities.”

 is not very exact

kind of like the Mustard Seed Parable.

 Please read about natural sanctions in this link:

THE PARABLE OF FAITH – PART ONE

The Parable of Faith – Part two

Pope Benedict XVI and the Mustard Tree

Parable of the Mustard Seed Part 4

==========================

D.C. gay rights groups evacuated after bomb threats

What is a marriage called when a gay person marries a straight person?

Half gay marriage? Half straight marriage?

How about if the other person isn’t aware of the other persons sexuality? What if the person isn’t even aware of their own sexuality?

Then what? Does that mean they are forever married until death even though it is a bad arrangement?

I don’t think it is fair to draw a line on this human right. I wonder how many unnecessary tragedies have occurred because of this type of hypocrisy especially when it comes to arranged marriages over the history of this world. How many murders have occurred to coverup ones sexuality because of what “the church” deemed legitimate?

Anne Boleyn and others come to my mind!

————————–

 I would rather see a homosexual have one partner and learn about marriage than live wildly and not learn about marriage. Marriage tends to stabilize a person which is good for many reasons. Depriving a person of a stabile loving environment is cruel and certainly doesn’t help.

Marriage is a private relationship between adults so they should be able to marry as long as the other person wants the same,

just as I believe a person has the right to a divorce if things don’t work out, without ramifications.

I should have the right to raise my child my way without hindrance from others such as my government and my government school system. I should be able to homeschool if I so choose with out interference from my government. It is not my governments business how I raise my child.

 Sodom and Gommorah

I believe the reason the angels blinded the crowd wasn’t because of their sexual orientation. It was because they were demanding attention from the angels and forcing themselves upon the angels, Lot, and his family. They had no right to do that and Lot should not have offered his daughter to them. They were forcing themselves upon Lot, his family, and the angels. That is why I believe they were blinded.

God did not destroy Rome or Greece and I think they also had homosexuals living in their countries. But our bibles tell us that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed.

Did Jesus destroy homosexuals when he came?

I don’t recall that he did, but he healed people with various imperfections.

Why was Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed?

The bible says that it was because the sin of the people had basically gotten so bad that God could not ignore it anymore. It wasn’t just the homosexuals.

It was everyone in those cities.

I do not know what Gomorrah means but this is what it says is the definition:

Go·mor·rah 2
n.

A wicked or depraved place

Sodom means:

Sodomy – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sodomy refers to anal sex or other non-penile/vaginal copulation-like acts, especially between male persons or between a person and an animal.

So we have wickedness, depravity, anal sex and beastiality, and I don’t know what the other non-penile/vaginal copulation means ….maybe oral sex, heavy petting and other things. I do not believe it means private masterbation as wickapedia states, but I could be wrong.

So basically the two names of the two cities doesn’t exclude a particular gender. The definition of the names of those two cities does however seem to point to sexual sin and wickedness. 

Men, women, children, and animals were destroyed.

Obviously sin was rampant amongst all the people and tolerated by Lot and his family.

Abraham made a deal with the angels hoping to spare the two cities, if the destroying angels could find a certain amount of righteous people would the destroying angels spare the cities from destruction. I forget the amount that they agreed upon but it was not just a few but it seems they could not even find that amount because the bible says those cities were not spared.

From that I glean that it is a good idea to allow righteous people to be righteous,

because it is those people and their righteousness that keep the world safe.

 In the Gospel of John after Jesus had arisen he said

John 14:1

Let not your heart be troubled:

ye believe in God, 

believe also in me.

————————————————

We should help people to believe in humane, thoughtfully, kindly ways within the laws of the countries and not persecute believers or non believers, or disembowel them and kill them, lie to them, or torture them, or trick them because they are imperfect.

Christians are imperfect.

Nobody said that a believer was perfect.

Christians should not expect perfection in non believers either.

Non believers should not expect perfection in believers.

Angels are imperfect too…..

Putting someone on the rack doesn’t improve them.  I don’t expect the Roman Catholic establishment to be perfect either. They have made huge mistakes but should also have to live by the laws of the land and own up to their mistakes. They have accomplished some good things too and we cannot discount their service in some capacities.  Most Roman Catholics are wonderful people and imperfect.

The Roman Catholic Church established a Court of the Gentiles

about the same time as they felt they were being persecuted

because of their abuse of children

and not because of their beliefs.

That is the lie.

It is not a coincidence.

Now the RCC and the Pope and their “protection”

won’t allow anyone to see their secret files,

because they percieve themselves to be HOLY and above the laws of the land

but want us to suffer their subtly maniacal inquisitions

with the powers that they have established for over 2000 years

through deception..

That is the EPITOME of TREACHERY!

I believe if they own up to their mistakes they as a church could be healed and survive because they are human.

Obviously that power has corrupted them.

If they go down we all go down. That’s how these cowards do business.

Abusers of mankind!

Vatican Investigating Girl Scouts

for Links to Safe-Sex Education Groups

Ignorance is their ace in the hole, you might say. That is why there was such a thing as the Dark Ages when the lay people were not allowed to read the bible, in essence, they want to discern for us and deceive us. It is their power. Everything they do is toward that purpose. Education on the other hand gives power back to the individual and out of their hands.

Wikipedia head joins Vatican meeting, talks about abortion controversy 

Wikipedia and peace

“Honduran Cardinal Oscar Rodriguez Maradiaga of Tegucigalpa told the meeting that while people today are better educated and have greater access to information than in the past, they are becoming less human because education is focused so heavily on hard science, that it leaves aside questions about the meaning of human life and destiny.”

“Church sites, though, need to have filtering software and participants who can exercise “social control” on those who misbehave.”

Obviously they want to control us their way. Please read:

The Fruits of the Vatican

——————————–

There were 2 other cities in the plain besides Sodom and Gomorrah which were destroyed.

It is quite possible, since no one knows where these 4 places are located,

that Sodom and Gomorrah is a prophecy.

Don’t discount that possibility.

==============

What is sin?

Wickedness, depravity, bad behavior, and bad morals.  The bible says that homosexuality and beastiality are an abomination. Disobeying the Ten Commandments is considered to be sin.  The rapid decline in the morals of this country by the average citizen seems to coincide with the dismissal of the rule of law.

Whose law?

God’s law.

We have so many new laws in this country, much more than we had 50  years ago. Obviously, it isn’t the addition of these new laws, but the dismissal and disregarding of God’s law in our country that is affecting our country.

Lawlessness and disobedience 

Most of our kids don’t remember or were not alive when debates about the Ten Commandments were occurring in this country, but I remember it was my generation that rebelled against the monuments of God’s law. As I recall, it was the atheists that were the initiators of this mission, because they don’t believe in God. Free love and the hippie movement were also accepted by some of the population and are now standardized in our relationships in various ways. Abortion also was debated and now we have legal abortion for the rights of the mother and against the rights of the baby. the drug trade and drug usage prospered, homosexuals started to come out of the closet.

 I believed in a government separation of church and state.

I went to an Episcopal church for a couple of years in my early teens.

The Church I attended was hit by lightning and burned up. It coincided with a Gay/effeminate Rector taking over the position at about the same time that the church had invested in a new organ. I noticed the new rector because he swished down the aisle and I thought he was weird, but at the time I did not know about homosexuality in any form. Clueless!  When my family attended this church on many Sundays both my brother and I would get nauseated and have to leave early. It was a real symptom. Either something was wrong with me and my brother, or the church. Well, my brother and I did not get struck by lightning or burn up. So obviously something was wrong with the church. Maybe it meant that God does not approve of a homosexual leading the church. I cannot say for sure. Maybe God did not approve of the church itself. I highly doubt the organ was the problem, but it also burned in the church fire . Neither did the rector. The fact is I can’t remember if I didn’t have that same symptom before the new rector. Maybe it meant that God does not approve of a homosexual leading the church. I cannot say for sure. Maybe God did not approve of the church itself. I highly doubt the organ was the problem, but it also burned in the church fire. Maybe God didn’t like the model of the organ.

We ought to regard and erect the monuments of God’s Law

to remind the humans and the angels about

the Ten Commandments

that God designed

so that our children and other generations to follow

might have the chance to marry.

I have read a lot of the bible but I have not read the whole bible. I have compared the gospels for a number of reasons and I have chosen whom I believe. The Gospel of John. I am not positive in my conclusions to the 100 percentile, but He makes sense to me. I cannot say that the things told in the other 3 gospels did not occur, but does that make it true and I guess by that I mean the content and the conclusions made by the three synoptic gospel writers and all of their quotes attributed to Jesus.

The Gospel of John gives details that are not present in the other three gospels. He names names of the people in his gospel as if he knew them and was a witness. He makes sense. Jesus doesn’t come off as a fruit cake or a tyrant in this gospel. The other three gospels make Jesus sound like a lunatic and I don’t believe them for that cause. I think he was preceded and shadowed by lunatics and copycats.

Think about the coverup of the assassination of JFK. It is similar to what happened to Jesus except that JFK did not say he was the Messiah. He did have a message though and he paid dearly for it.

I do know that when I started to compare the gospels and write about it, it seemed to stir up a lot of controversy. That was not my intent. Maybe it is just coincidence, but I don’t think it is. I think it is a real threat to the establishment of religion, but that was not my intent either, but it is scary to see how deceptive the clergy have been.

I think it should be a human right to worship whom you believe.

I do not believe I have the right to kill, maim, or force others to believe what I believe. But I do have the right to express my beliefs. It is a human right, just like African Americans have the right to work in public businesses, worship, eat, sleep, drink, marry, drink from a public water fountain, buy a house in any neighborhood, get loans, own a business,  and go to a public school or public college without hindrance because of their race.

I do not go to their bedrooms because it is private.

It is none of my business what they do there. 

It is between them and God

and whether they believe or not is between them and God.

1 Corinthians 6:9
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate,

nor abusers of themselves with mankind,

Who is this referring to? Obviously not mankind

The bible says that the effeminate do not inherit the kingdom of God …..

who determines that measure of manliness that does inherit the kingdom of God?

Mitt Romney? George Bush? Billy Graham? Cal Thomas? The BGEA? The RCC?

The Secret Service? Meryl Streep? The Jesuits? Putin? Hillary Clinton? Mel Gibson? Simon Cowell? Hollywood? President Barack Obama?

Ellen DeGeneres?  Steven Tyler? Randy Jackson?American Idol?

I suspect that “the effeminate” are the cowards that aid and abet that power that abuses mankind.

That is why Revelation says:

Revelation 18:4
And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues.

By remaining you empower the enemy of mankind and that is cowardly, which is effeminate.

It is not how manly or feminine you are,

but whether you are an abuser without remorse of your fellow human like a Nazi.

Here is a site you should listen to and hear. Has quite a few you tubes worthy of contemplating about the Roman Catholic Church and other subjects:

 Stephen Fry dismantles the Roman Catholic Church

“The Roman Catholic Church faces permanent disruption and banishment in at least five countries if it does not comply with ten “non-negotiable measures” by September 15, 2012, according to a global coalition of

survivors of church rape and torture.”

Catholic Church Faces Disruption and Banishment

as Irish Cardinal Set to Resign

 by Kevin Annett

This isn’t small potatos. This system is abusive worldwide!

Are Human Rights

the same or different

than Moral Rights?

I don’t know.

God gave us the choice to believe Him or not to believe. 

God has the right to judge us however he sees fit to do so as a country and individually.  He created us.

His standard is written about in the bible and it is up to each of us individually to decide and make choices that please him or displease him.

It is a high standard if you include the other books of the Old Testament as well as the other books of the New Testament.

The Ten Commandments are pretty basic though.

Our country was born by invading this continent with lots of different peoples that escaped from other countries of all different religions and races.

Our government is supposed to represent the people that are here.

That happens to include homosexuals because they are human, as far as I know.

Human rights. What does that mean?

It means if you are human you should be able to enjoy the same rights that other humans have legally.

I believe that includes marriage,

but not sodomy.

Privacy is a human right. Sex is a privacy right.

I’m not sure about that,

but it makes sense to me.

I don’t believe it was intended by God for people to be homosexual, but obviously it was a possibility. I don’t think He approves of sodomy or any other sin. Did God intend for marriage to be between a man and a man? No, I don’t think so since He doesn’t approve of sodomy, but it was a possibility. The bible says that God will deal with sodomites. It is not my business what happens in their bedroom. It is between them and God. My sins are not their sins, and visa-versa. Unless of course done in public eye.

What is public?

Well if our government and religious institutions are disobeying our privacy rights that might include what we do in the privacy of our own homes via computers, the internet, tv, telephone

and anything wired electronically, etc.

Are babies not human?

Do they have the right to live?

They can’t speak till they learn to speak and they in fact are dependent on their human mothers womb until they are designed in the womb

created by God

so shouldn’t they be protected by humans and their human rights

since they are human too and so that they may enjoy the right to marry?

(TO BE CLEAR ABOUT MY STANCE ON ABORTION WHICH IS A VERY UNCLEAR DILEMMA FOR ME AND I’M SURE MANY OTHERS I HAVE WRITTEN ABOUT MY PAST IN REGARDS TO ABORTION IN ANOTHER POST AND WHEN I FIND IT I WILL TRY TO LINK IT BUT I DID HAVE A LEGAL ABORTION. I REGRET IT BUT AT THE TIME WHEN I WAS IMPREGNATED I DID NOT REGRET IT. )

How about children?

They have a right not to be sexually abused by their teachers and the clergy so that they might enjoy the right to marry and not be screwed up in their future relationships and marriage. The clergy should be forthright and offer assistance and openness of their accounts and records

instead of hiding and stalling. 

Do the right thing.

It is a human right,

unless you are not human.

========================

If homosexuality is a learned trait then I leave that to Our Father and Jesus to heal the person of this trait when He decides is the right time for that particular individual. Same goes for a Hindu or a Buddhist, etc. Our Father reaches a person however and whenever that He does. I don’t think forcing the religion of Christianity upon another person by using bully tactics like Haarp or other facilities to cause mayhem and earthquakes (which I believe is occurring now) is the right way. If God Himself intervenes that’s His business!!!!! But I know that lately our government and other governments are using these places to scare and intimidate people.

I can’t say positively that HAARP is responsible for the tsunami/earthquake in Japan last year, but it seems highly likely and should be investigated.

But if it was a judgement from God then what did it mean?

Here are some interesting coincidences that were occurring at that particular time as far as I know in Japan involving the Pope, The Neocatechumenal Way, Roman Catholic leaders and the Japanese people. I’m sure this is just the tip of the iceberg but nevertheless ought to be scrutinized. Please read:

Japan Quakes after Confirmation of the Neocatechumenal Way

Maybe the power that is used at places like HAARP have been around longer than we know.The reason I say that is because of what happened at Yodfat. Please read:

Josephus and His Footprints

Using bully tactics like keeping files on every person in the country to blackmail them, coercing them, is DIS-GRACEFUL.  Our government or the clergy should not be doing this to anyone and it seems that they are, from what I have witnessed and written about in my posts.

It is that kind of business that in essence is a Disgraceful Force that might incite Our Father to intervene such as what occurred at Sodom and Gomorah.

Things are pretty rotten in America and the world

and have been declining for a long time.

Why?

I believe we have misinterpreted our bibles.

I also believe we have misinterpreted the signs,

partially because of the powers and those that wield them

who want us to misinterpret these signs.

I do not have any power over any one so I am not responsible for what is happening in our country and abroad, nor do I want to have that power. But I am speaking out and at this time still have a right to voice my opinion and display what I have uncovered over the internet and what I have learned as a believer in God and Jesus written about in the Gospel of John.

I came to those conclusions by reading the bible and comparing the gospels and comparing them to the Old Testament.

and disregarding what is obviously fraudulent and maniacal.

The Fruits of the Vatican

Mitt Romney’s 2006 Rally Against Gay Marriage

Pope Benedict XVI and His Power of Suggestion

Obviously, my beliefs do affect how I react to human rights, people in general, religion and government.

If these facilities are using their power to incite, coerce, create signs such as earthquakes, tsunamis, the right to earn money or inhibiting buying and selling, behavior modification via electronic devices or anything wired to force people to accept a religion or belief or behave in a bad way then I would say they are INHUMANE. I would say they who are doing this obviously don’t agree with humans having human rights and are waging terrorism against the public. If that is true then a homosexual married couple might be at risk from those that are against this human right and humans in general.

Case in point:

Cracks in the Washington Post story on Romney’s ‘pranks’ emerge

A question emerges in reading the Washington Post piece on Mitt Romney today: How can Romney’s old pal Stu White tell the Washington Post that he has “long been bothered by the Lauber incident” — and then later admit to ABC News that he was “not present for the prank” and “was not aware of it until this year when he was contacted by the Washington Post”?

Romney Friend Stu White Says Campaign Wants Him to Counter Prank Accusations

“One former classmate and old friend of Romney’s – who refused to be identified by name – said there are “a lot of guys” who went to Cranbrook who have “really negative memories” of Romney’s behavior in the dorms, behavior this classmate describes as “like Lord of the Flies.”

The classmate believes Romney is lying when he claims to not remember it.

“It makes these fellows [who have owned up to it] very remorseful.  For [Romney] not to remember it? It doesn’t ring true.  How could the fellow with the scissors forget it?” the former classmate said.

In a radio interview Thursday morning,

Romney offered an apology for the pranks,

but said that “homosexuality” was never on his mind”

==============

Which reminds me of what God said to Abraham when Abraham took his son Isaac to Mt. Moriah to sacrifice him.

After Abraham had built an altar and had bound his son and was about to kill Isaac in the act of sacrifice,

God intervened and told Abraham not to kill his son and said 

That sacrificing Abraham’s son Isaac was never on his mind.

Then Abraham found a ram with its horns caught in the bushes

which God had provided.

Then Abraham sacrificed the ram/lamb (depending on which bible version you read) instead.

I’m sorry and need to apologize

for the above statement:

I made a mistake because I went back to read about Abraham and Isaac and what I had written that God had said (that sacrificing Isaac was never on his mind) is not true. I don’t know how that happened honestly, but God blessed Abraham for his fear of God and his willingness to offer Isaac his only son. I really thought I had read the above but now I cannot find it.

Please read the link:

Genesis 22

And they came to the place which God had told him of; and Abraham built an altar there, and laid the wood in order, and bound Isaac his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood.

10 And Abraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.

11 And the angel of the Lord called unto him out of heaven, and said, Abraham, Abraham: and he said, Here am I.

12 And he said, Lay not thine hand upon the lad, neither do thou any thing unto him:

for now I know that thou fearest God,

seeing thou hast not withheld thy son,

thine only son from me.

13 And Abraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold behind him a ram caught in a thicket by his horns: and Abraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering in the stead of his son.

14 And Abraham called the name of that place Jehovahjireh: as it is said to this day, In the mount of the Lord it shall be seen.

15 And the angel of the Lord called unto Abraham out of heaven the second time,

16 And said, By myself have I sworn, saith the Lord, for because thou hast done this thing, and hast not withheld thy son, thine only son:

17 That in blessing I will bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the heaven, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and thy seed shall possess the gate of his enemies;

18 And in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because thou hast obeyed my voice.

But what about Ishmael? Wasn’t he also Abraham’s son? Hmmm. I guess from this God did not consider that Ishmael was Abraham’s son.

Maybe because God knew something not revealed? 

Maybe God knew they would be abusers of mankind.

stevearticle-2235635-1621F8B1000005DC-779_634x404

images-1

Still I know that we do make mistakes in God’s name and in the name of Jesus as I have demonstrated so personally. Sorry!

Please read:

Binding of Isaac

“While it is often imagined that Isaac was a small child, some sources claim he was an adult (noting that Jews are considered adults at age 13). The Talmudic sages teach that Isaac was thirty-seven, likely based on the next biblical story, which is of Sarah’s death at 127 (she was ninety when Isaac was born). Bishop Ussher’s chronology would place Isaac at about 20 years of age.”

Genesis 22:14 states that it occurred at “the mount of the LORD”: in 2 Chronicles 3:1Psalm 24:3Isaiah 2:3 & 30:29; and Zechariah 8:3, the Bible seems to identify the location of this event as the hill on which Solomon was said to later build the Temple, now known as the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.[c

Obviously, people jumped the gun

and made some horrible mistakes

in the name of God and in the name of Jesus

and do the same now!

———————

John 8:57-59

57 Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?

58 Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you,

Before Abraham was, I am.

59 Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself, and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.

For the longest time I have tried to figure out

what Jesus was trying to communicate

when he said in the Gospel of John:

” Verily, verily, I say unto you,

Before Abraham was, I am.”

Is this what he meant?

The reason I say that is because the Temple Mount was built on this site

where the event spoken about in Genesis 2:2 occurred

with Abraham and his son Isaac!

I even thought maybe the exodus of the hebrews led by Moses from Egypt might have occurred

before the event spoken about on the Mount where Abraham and Isaac made their sacrifice,

but now it is quite possible that Jesus in the Gospel of John

was talking about the event with Abraham and Isaac on that same location.

=====================

Communication between humans is tough sometimes. I noticed through experience that men have a tough time communicating with each other where as women have an easier time communicating. Men are imperfect that way. Women on the other hand are more emotional and tend to be imperfect that way.

Even angels were imperfect.

We humans and angels were made with flaws for a purpose. It is our nature to be imperfect and until God perfects all of us we have to cope with those imperfections in ourselves, each other and the others,

because who knows if God will decide to turn the tables and when.

 In any case, we should try to persuade our peers, clergy, friends and neighbors, families, and our government to do what is right.

Just because we are fighting terrorism does not mean we should do the same and become terrorists ourselves. Believe me we will win the war on terrorism if we fight the war

the right way with integrity and mercy!

How we go about doing it is just as important as accomplishing it. Murdering each other, wire tapping each other, raping and pillaging, invading each other’s bedrooms,  intentional disinformation, blackmailing each other, vexing people, impersonating another person, stealing and robbing, starving people, leaving an individual helpless and unable to protect themselves by disarming them, prohibiting each other in inhumane ways is the wrong way to attain human rights

and it is the wrong way to change a person’s belief, spirit, and heart.

Lawlessness vs Lawlessness = Lawlessness

Lawlessness + Lawlessness = Lawlessness

which is in essence

war.

Are we at war with God or OG?

Opinion: On gay marriage, Latinos agree with Obama

OBAMA’S GAY MARRIAGE HEAD FAKE By Roger Stone

“Once Gay Americans are through celebrating President Barack Obama’s “personal” support of Gay marriage equality, they will learn that Obama’s “evolution” changes nothing. Obama’s new position is a bullshit cop-out.

This comes on the heels of an cynical Obama campaign pirouette where Team Obama trotted out first Secretary of State Hillary Clinton then Vice President “Crazy” Joe Biden to say they support gay marriage and imply that the President would too–after the election.

Now, incredibly, Obama says Gay marriage is a state issue. That’s what they used to say about abortion and before that, slavery. Now Obama tells us that gay couples should be able to marry but he doesn’t believe they have a right to do so. Obama would leave the question to the states–in other words -the status quo. This is like saying that public schools ought to be integrated but if the people of Mississippi disagree, well he says, “let the states decide” …”

===================================

By the way, what is the 2nd Commandment

of the Ten Commandments?

What is wrong with saying

“do unto others as you would have them do unto you?” 

There are always going to be extremes on any issue. I don’t think we should make determinations of any issues on that basis,

otherwise I would suggest outlawing marriage for heterosexuals.

============================


Biden apologizes to Obama for marriage controversy

uh huh.

The Trickery and Treachery of Mitt Romeny

Tim Carney & Tamron Hall Throw Down

“What I am asking about is how the campaign has handled this situation, how he handled the Colorado reporter, how he handled same-sex marriage where

he said he agrees with gay parents be able to adopt,

but he does not agree with same-sex marriage? “

That’s a misnomer.

Homosexuals are good enough to raise kids

but not good enough to be married!

Does Mitt Romney not like orphans, kids, and homosexuals?

Why?

May be Mitty Romney shavout.

Mitt Romney’s 2006 Rally Against Gay Marriage

This man is sinister, sick, demented,

and speaks in dark sentences!

Romney’s lame response on bullying allegations

It is okay if you’re gay … Stop Bullying Now!

This you tube is about bullying of kids and suicide. But since I posted this in my article I can’t seem to get to the you tube on this link above. So try the link below:

This is what is called “social control” and believe me it is calculated.

http://truedantalion.blogspot.com/2010/10/when-chain-of-bullying-continues.html

What Romney can accomplish at Liberty University

Sometimes looks are deceiving and sometimes they aren’t.

He reminds me of George Ganswein,

the Pope Benedict’s Secretary the man who dresses the Pope.

Romney apologizes for high school ‘teasing’

The times we are living in are treacherous and the leaders we have in our government and religious institutions are as confused as we are because of the treachery and need our help and prayers. We should try to obey the laws of the country we live in as best we can and hopefully all of us can get through the deceit and treachery eventually.

—————————————-

The Monarch, Devil’s Breath, and the Eucharist

Evangelicals, Taxes, Jobs, and the Consumer

May 11, 2012 Posted by | "CODEWORD BARBELON – DANGER IN THE VATICAN: THE SONS OF LOYOLA & THEIR PLANS FOR WORLD DOMINATION", American Idol, Assassination of President Kennedy, Babylon, Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversy, False God of Rome, false Synoptic Gospels, George Ganswein, Girl Scouts, Gospel of John, Great Deception, It is okay if you're gay ... Stop Bullying Now!, JESUIT, Merangue's Blog, Notre Dame of Paris and the Courtyard of the Gentiles, Obama, Perversion and Mitt Romney, Perversion of MItt Romeny, Pope Benedict XVI, President Obama, Roman Catholicism, Romans, shavout, Synoptic Gospels, Synoptic prince of this world, The Abomination of Desolation, The Assassination of JFK, The Clintons, the Great Deception, Vatican | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Beware Oh brother, beware don’t you listen to the words. The tender lies….


The Beast

Speaking with his tongue which he does quite often.

 

For instance Franklin Graham representing BGEA:

 

5 things we learned from Franklin Graham

By Dan Gilgoff and Eric Marrapodi, CNN Belief Blog Co-Editors

5. Graham didn’t direct the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association to remove its website’s reference to Mormonism as a cult shortly before Election Day. But he agrees with the move. “I didn’t even know it was there. We have like 10,000 pages on our website,” Graham told us.

Graham said the reference isn’t coming back to the site. “I don’t want to be involved in calling people names,” he told us. “I want to reach people for Christ, and how can I do that if I’m calling them a name? I don’t even like the word cult; it sounds like dungeons and dragons or something.”

Give me a break….he didn’t even know it was there?

This guy is full of deceipt.

It’s okay to change your mind. It was a self-serving gesture for your ministry and an alliance to benefit you, and nothing more.  

Talk about disingenuous!

False dilemma

“……The presentation of a false choice often reflects a deliberate attempt to eliminate the middle ground on an issue. Eldridge Cleaver used such a quotation during his 1968 presidential campaign: “You’re either part of the solution or part of the problem.”[4] Another example would be the former US president George W. Bush stating that the world had a choice to make; “Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.”……”

Luke 9:50-51

 49And John answered and said, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name; and we forbad him,

because he followeth not with us.

 50And Jesus said unto him, Forbid him not: for he that is not against us is for us.

How about Benny Hinn?

Here is a you-tube of an example of Grace in the form of Benny Hinn a product of Billy Graham’s Evangelicals and Roman Catholicism

which I tried to transcribe a portion:

Benedictus Hinn Slaying himself I guess
Benny Hinn – Servant of God – You must See this

Benny Hinn – Casting Out Demons & Devils from people (1)

“Look at me. You’ve been oppressed by a devil. You’ve had demons literally try to kill you. You’ve had the devil himself try to kill you. I see when you were a child about three years of age. Someone put a curse on you. You remember that? “

(Woman shakes her head saying no.)

“You don’t because you were three years old.”

How does he know?

(Then Benny Hinn says something hard to translate and then says:)

“…….you are free in the name of Jesus From the top of her head to the soles of her feet she’s free.”

(Then Benny Hinn yells and pushes her: ) 

“She is free in Jesus name.”

(Then the crowd erupts in applause and he raises his hands in the air and says something I cannot translate:)

This is junk! Oh, it may be real, but it is still junk!

Were Christians really thrown to the lions?

“4. Roman executions typically were considered a form of public spectacle. “

In the gospels and the following books the person who curses a person is Paul! And the other time a curse is mentioned by Peter in regards to Jesus becoming a curse and implicit in that assumption is Judas, the slaves that were hung in the south,  and anyone who hangs on a tree which could have another meaning….such as.Christmas Tree Decorations/ decorators. 

1 Corinthians 16:22
If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maranatha.

Please read:

The Grace of Anathema Maranatha

In Roman Catholicism the only person allowed to curse an anathema marantha is the Pope and his Bishops.

Which of course you have to wonder: Was Saul/Paul a pope?

He sure traveled far and wide as do popes in our time.

Anyone who curses a three year old is sick.

What Bennie Hinn offers this woman is a false dilemma. A False Jesus. One that kills, maims, curses, possesses,

and ultimately destroys.

The devil posing as a healer.

What he offers her is Paul. Ba’al!

This is the way of Deception. However, Thank God we do have someone that loves us written about in the Gospel of John. And He is aware of what occurs in these arenas!

Please read:

I Am That I Am

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

==================================

Here is a link with information From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia about Benny Hinn:

Benny Hinn

“Toufik Benedictus ”Benny” Hinn”

“History

Hinn was born in Jaffa, in 1952, in the then newly-established state of Israel[3] to Palestinian Christian parents. He was raised within the Eastern Orthodox tradition.[4]

Soon after the 1967 Arab-Israeli War (a.k.a. “The Six-Day War)”, Hinn’s family emigrated to TorontoOntarioCanada, where he attended but later prematurely left the Georges Vanier Secondary School. In his books, Hinn states that his father was the mayor of Jaffa at the time of his birth, and that as a child, he was socially isolated and was handicapped by a severe stutter, but was nonetheless a first-class student.[5] These claims, however, have been disputed by critics of Hinn.[6] As a teenager in Toronto, Hinn converted from Greek Orthodoxy to Pentecostalism, eventually joining a singing troupe made up of young evangelicals. According to a 2004 CBC report on Hinn, his newfound religious devotion during this period became so intense that his family became concerned that he was turning into a religious fanatic. Hinn was taught the bible and mentored by Dr. Winston I. Nunes of Broadview Faith Temple in Toronto.[7]

speaking in tongues

Again speaking with his tongue 

Benny Hinn – Billy Graham’s Little Ant

The Devil is tricky: Very interesting parable and very quaint except that the problem with it is the false dilemma such as what occurred recently in Japan. Please read: 

Japan Quakes after Confirmation of the Neocatechumenal Way

Benny Hinn was raised Eastern Orthodox tradition which is another form  of Catholicism, one of many. Then he became Pentacostal which is still another form of Catholicism, one of many!

They created it as another false choice!

Where do you think “All Roads Lead to Rome” originated?

Same choice offered for the “little ant parable of Billy Graham.”

They create a dilemma, and they offer solutions to makes you think you have overcome! 

They interfere so that they may intervene! In legal terms it would be called “Entrapment.”

The Fruits of the Vatican

===========

“In criminal law, entrapment is conduct by a law enforcement agent inducing a person to commit an offense that the person would otherwise have been unlikely to commit.”

In moral law it might be perhaps causing unwanted pregnancies by introducing drugs, propaganda and making abortion legal. Or causing joblessness through hate or prejudice causing a person to steal for food, deal drugs, prostitution etc.

The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia

While our troops fought in Vietnam drug use among youth definitely increased. Itis not by accident!

=================

You are not given a fair choice!!!!!! 

Like the nurses you hear about that create near death experiences in order to save you when in fact they are the enemy obviously. It gives them a false sense of power over others. Makes them think they are Gods angels or God himself.

Like Sophie’s Choice.

Billy Graham and Benny Hinn are products of Nazism…Facism…..Roman Catholicism!

(Above picture is a snapshot of Billy Graham posing as Jack Ready a Secret Service Agent at Love Field Airport in Dallas the day of the assassination of JFK. He is signaling someone after Jackie Kennedy received a Lamb chops puppet which she hid under the red roses, the same red roses that she mused about receiving in later interviews , and failing to mention the puppet! I would guess that is where she hid a weapon used to kill JFK and/or to create a diversion which Roy Kellerman did mention hearing a flurry of gun shots. Whatever was hidden inside the puppet was important enough for Billy Graham/Jack Ready to make a signal to someone….probably another agent/press/clergyman)

They are

Tyrannosaurus

TREX

 ”Tyrannosaurus was a bipedal carnivore with a massive skull balanced by a long, heavy tail. Relative to the large and powerful hindlimbs, Tyrannosaurus forelimbs were small, though unusually powerful for their size, and bore two clawed digits.

Their massive skull is Golgotha:

The place of the skull where Jesus of Nazareth was nailed to the cross.

 Their works are their veil!

They are evil.

They are Evangelicals: Evil Angels: Beasts

========

CNS exclusive excerpt: Msgr. Ratzinger discusses his brother, the pope
Q. Do you also watch television together? Does the Holy Father have a favorite program?A. Well, before the news, there used to be a television series “Inspector Rex.” We always used to watch it, because we like dogs, too.”
=========

John 16:2-4

  2They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh,

that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.

 3And these things will they do unto you,

because they have not known the Father, nor me.

 4But these things have I told you, that when the time shall come, ye may remember that I told you of them. And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you.

US election 2012: Rick Santorum says JFK makes him sick


The pictures of Billy Graham are snapshots from Greta Van Susteren’s interview of him talking about the Bush family .

Greta Exclusive: A Conversation With the Rev. Billy Graham

The last picture is of a man  (who I think is none other than Billy Graham in disguise) at the airport with JFK in Dallas less than an hour before the assassination right before he enrages

because he is caught on camera signaling to someone with his two claws

as Jacky receives something at the fence line.

Revelation 16:10-11

 10And the fifth angel poured out his vial upon the seat of the beast; and his kingdom was full of darkness;

and they gnawed their tongues for pain,

 11And blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains (panis?=demons)

and their sores (roses?),

and repented not of their deeds.

————————————-

Please read all of the parts of the

The Covenant with Many

Rev. David Wilkerson and Evangelicalism

CBS News and JFK (The first few hours)

The Stones of Amen

George Gänswein, Pope Benedict XVI, and Mel Gibson

Mary’s Spikenard and Luke’s Parable – Revised

Other articles can be found at

Merangue’s Blog

New and Revised Articles

January 11, 2012 Posted by | Assassination of President Kennedy, Benediction, beware, BGEA, Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversy, Billy Graham, CAMELOT, Corinthians, Evangelicalism and the Covenant With Many, Evangelicals, False God of Rome, false Synoptic Gospels, Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Great Deception, Loggins and Messina, Pathway to Glory, Rick Santorum, US election 2012 | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why Callest Thou Me Good?


Matthew 19:17
And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God:

but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

Mark 10:18
And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God.

Luke 18:19
And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God.

The Synoptic Jesus is not good!

Should we trust whoever wrote these verses that say that

Jesus says this in the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke

which are known as the Synoptic Gospels.

 

In the Gospel of John

Jesus does not say that he is not good!

So why does the Synoptic Jesus say that he is not good?

I suspect and believe the reason is to taint the character

of the real Jesus of Nazareth written about in the Gospel of John!

However, the Synoptic gospels say that God was well pleased with him

so he must have been good,

unless he said he was not good before he found out

that God was well pleased with him.

In any case, it seems that there is a possibility that Jesus was misquoted about being good or not good:

Matthew 3:17
And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.

Matthew 12:18

 18Behold my servant, whom I have chosen; my beloved, in whom my soul is well pleased: I will put my spirit upon him, and he shall shew judgment to the Gentiles.

Matthew 17:5
While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him.

Mark 1:10-11

 10And straightway coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens opened, and the Spirit like a dove descending upon him:

 11And there came a voice from heaven, saying, Thou art my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.

Luke 3:21-22

 21Now when all the people were baptized, it came to pass, that Jesus also being baptized, and praying, the heaven was opened,

 22And the Holy Ghost descended in a bodily shape like a dove upon him, and a voice came from heaven, which said, Thou art my beloved Son; in thee I am well pleased.

So is the bible infallible?

If men wrote it and transcribed it

it is bound to be fallible.

in·fal·li·ble

absolutely trustworthy or sure: an infallible rule.

unfailing in effectiveness or operation; certain: an infallible remedy.
not fallible; exempt from liability to error, as persons, their judgment, or pronouncements: an infallible principle.

Roman Catholic Church . immune from fallacy or liability to error in expounding matters of faith or morals by virtue of the promise made by Christ to the Church.

So what was that promise?

Well of course it doesn’t say so we have to guess, which isn’t a good option!

I do not recall anywhere in the bible Jesus saying that the bible was infallible.

Had it been written yet? No.

However, Peter said in 2Peter 3:15-17 in defense of Paul’s epistles that we should not wrest with the things that are hard to understand because the people that do wrest with the bible are unstable and stupid, or words to that effect.

2 Peter 3:15-17

 15And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;

 16As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.

(Of course it is hard not to wrest with scripture when Peter misquotes scripture as he does in the Book of Acts.)

 17Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness.

Jesus of Nazareth told Peter at the Sea of Galilee:

John 21

18Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdest thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not.

 19This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God.

And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him,

Follow me.

Sounds to me as if Peter was a free man until he met the another”! And I think that the another” was Paul!

Why would Jesus say follow me if it was okay to be girded by the another? Obviously, it was a warning to Peter!

Jesus also said earlier that the prince of this world had nothing in him.

John 14:30
Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

Galatians 1:16
To reveal his Son in me, that I might preach him among the heathen; immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood:

Who wrote Galatians? It appears to be Paul:

An Overview Of The Book Of Galatians

It’s pretty clear that “the prince of this world” was not good!

The Synoptic Jesus must be “the prince of this world”

and “the another”,

because he says he is not good!

Romans 2:16

 16In the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ according to

my gospel.

Did Jesus say that we would be judged by our secret thoughts according to Paul’s gospel?

No, he did not say that, so what the heck is Paul saying?

Who wrote Romans?

Paul wrote Romans!

What gospels are Pauls?

I suspect Paul’s gospels (plural)

are the Synoptic Gospels (very similar in content) that collide with the Gospel of John!

“The Another” and the “prince of this world” must be Paul.

1 Corinthians 3:22
Whether Paul, or Apollos, or Cephas, or the world, or life, or death, or things present, or things to come; all are your’s;

PAUL WANTED TO HAVE HIS CAKE AND EAT IT TOO. CHRISTIANS THAT FOLLOWED PAUL ALSO WANT THEIR CAKE AND EAT IT TOO. OBAMA AND HIS MOB ARE THE PERSONIFICATION OF THAT AND IT IS NOT A PLEASANT PHEASANT.

IT’S A TRICKY DICKY DEAL

Peter in the book of Acts seemed to have had a particular time to pray on the roof which is very islamic IMO. I think it proves he had been Islamicized by that time. He also hallucinated…had a vision which was in opposition to what happened to him in the Gospel of John. I think when a person fasts which the Synoptic Jesus (Jesus of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke) did for 40 days you experience hallucinations. The Gospel of John does not include that experience which was diametrically opposite to what Jesus said to Peter at the Sea of Galilee after he had risen when he fed them fish and directed them to the  school of fish (meat) because they had not caught any fishes yet. They caught 153 of them. I suspect that Peter had fasted because the book of Acts said he was hungry. The number 153 I think has to do with Mary. 153 days of Fatima, there is a 153 Hail Mary ritual, 153 Hilda is an asteroid. Anyway I have a few posts about the number 153. By the way just because Pope Benedict retired doesn’t mean he is not involved in todays events:

Pope Benedict XVI and 153 Great Fish

153 Hail Mary’s and 153 Hilda

I just found this article about Ben Affleck which spurred me to write the last paragraph. I think it is nice that he is doing what he is doing ( I guess) but didn’t catch why he was gonna eat on a dollar and a half a day. If I understood the reason it would be more instructive. Maybe he wants to see what it feels like to be poor? An exercise in not taking his wealth for granted? Trying to put ourselves in someone else’s shoes is a good thing I think. It gives us a better understanding of others. However 5 days is rather short. I guess he is a priest? They take vows a bunch, don’t they, or is that the monks?

Ben Affleck takes poverty vow:

Eat on $1.50 a day

How much is hummus? I don’t know cause I never bought the stuff.

As far as hating or being tired of the haters as Gwyneth Paltrow (another great actress) responded to his poverty vow: She said she was tired of haters. Myself, I’m sick and tired of Political Correctness. I don’t think it is correct. I don’t consider myself a hater but I do feel hate sometimes as any human being does. Anyone that doesn’t hate is on drugs or extremely light in the head. I’m sick and tired of the rules about not talking about Religion or Politics, because I think that is how we got into the mess we are in in the world today, but I know I certainly turn a lot of people off. I have no friends to prove it. I refuse to be silent. I think silence is the number one problem today in regard to these subjects (INCEST being a good example).

Here is another: First they came for the Jews

How many gay people have been murdered because they are gay? How many wives of gay kings have been murdered? Can’t help but think of Henry the v111. I’m sure there were more. How about the Prince of England now?

There are lots of examples

and I’m sure Gwyneth Paltrow has some interests in other things besides acting, doesn’t she?

Now I realize that Hollywood and the Music Industry were in arms about copyright laws and I have a feeling the issue hurt them tremendously in the pocket book so that they couldn’t afford that third mansion

and that is why they are more than willing to take tax payers money in place of their losses.

How many people have committed suicide because of incest or have been murdered to keep them quiet? How many people have died, committed suicide, been murdered, suffered in all kinds of ways because of that policy of silence or the fear of offending. I know I make people uncomfortable when I talk about the things I do or when I send them my articles or when I write about certain people who are in the spotlight. Their example, their exhibition is out for fodder. They often gain publicity by their exhibition and reap benefits why should they not take a bit of heat. I don’t know any of the people I write about on my blogs that are famous personally or in public nor do I follow them around with a camera but since it is in the news I give my take on whatever I see that I think pertains to what I am writing about. In a way they have helped me and I’m glad to be able to use them that way as examples good or bad or in between.

I learned what I learned about the bible and I freely share it because I think it is a life saver for me and hope it to be for whoever reads my blogs especially in our day and time and under the circumstances we find ourselves in.

I believe that believing in Jesus of the Gospel of John has protected me from evil.

It’s around me, and I see it, but truly has been a GODSEND for me and my kids.

And I believe the man at Benghazi helped me too. I don’t know why he was there or at whose direction, but he allowed me to see our President for who he is and was wake up call for me, and many in our government and in the press do not want you to wake up. I hope you deem it important and take notice and start to get a good understanding of what is occurring in the world today because eventually IT WILL AFFECT YOU.

Some miracles happened because of him for me. For one, my daughter and I escaped a car wreck. We should have been killed but the truck went through us without touching us.

Another my cat was missing for 7 weeks and I watched a huge cat the size of a mountain lion run down the street in front of my house (which was quite alarming) in the early morning before light and of course that freaked me out. It was worrisome when something you love is missing and you see that. While searching for my cat a woman said she had seen two cats of my cats description both dead (she was kind of cruel in her callousness, and I knew she was trying to make me give up and I didn’t) and then about the 6 1/2 week a flock of prey HUGE  birds with wingspan of and eagle came out of the clouds about 1000 of them into my neighborhood of 100 homes (very small neighborhood on the lake tucked between 5 or 6 neighborhoods) and the birds did not fly in any other neighborhoods next to us, just ours, so much so that people were stopping in their cars because it was so remarkable. The birds were the biggest I have ever seen AND THEY WERE REAL (not fake like a hollywood movie) and flew around right above the houses for a couple of hours hunting but they didn’t roost until they roosted in the creek side next to my neighborhood a few hours later and then they disappeared. About 2 days later or three I found my cat at school in the bus lane after a friend of my daughters called and said she saw him in the drain alive in the bus lane at school. I went and he wasn’t there the first time but I came back before dark and found him and he was very sick, his liver was in bad shape from not eating, he could barely get out of the drain. Anyway he lived and is perfectly healthy now. He has been a great source of comfort when I lose my hope, faith, love, and belief. It happens. The person who gave us the tip is being bullied to this day at school. It isn’t a coincidence. I know it but her mom doesn’t realize that it is being done on purpose. There have been miracles with my kids especially my eldest who was having some major problems and she is absolutely doing fantastic now. My youngest is still a piece of work but I haven’t given up and I know because of who I believe in she will be doing better even though she was bullied at school (she was a cheer leader and popular) and even though there are those that would like to entrap her, make false rumors about her, attack her physically, etc and treat her in the wrong way. I know it is because of my beliefs that they have picked on her but she will get past it and will be doing as well as my eldest soon enough.

After the birds came my NOW ex husband said that that was a natural occurrence or phenomenon but I had never heard of it ever in my life, and never had seen it before. Prove to me it is a natural occurrence. He said it happens from storms on lakes and a thousand huge birds of prey gather together and fly around a small neighborhood a couple hours then disappear.

SO I guess you can try to explain anything and everything away, but I say PROVE IT.

MOB RULE SUCKS BIG TIME but that is what is happening in America and if you want to survive their idiocracy please start believing in the Gospel of John and do not pray to A-men. (Either of them the Re and the Ra.) These are the Obamas and his legions of asses dicking around with everyone in the world and best you find cover if you want to live and if you care about your kids.

There are other miracles too. It is a Battleground out in the world in many ways besides terrorism or made up mass shootings at school etc. but I believe if you take a chance on who I believe in you will make it through.

I think he might have been an angel. He also warned me about Obama via Benghazi. That is when I knew that Obama was corrupt as the day is long.

I was sad to hear about Reese Witherspoon and her husband and not sure whether to believe what happened as it was portrayed. I think either they were made examples of by Law Enforcement or they allowed themselves to be examples for some political cause or he was driving while intoxicated but from the movies I have seen of her I always have appreciated her acting skills and cuteness and liked the example she portrays in the films I have seen with her in them and I doubt she was out of control as they have written about her. More down below about that subject.

These days with Law Enforcement, FBI, Homeland Security in Boston, and shutting down very large areas of population in hunt for the alleged bombers (Martial Law) and the accounts given by the officer that was in the helicopter about how the brother ran over the other brother and the eye witness account saying the opposite I really do not trust Law Enforcement or my government as I once did. Immigration reform is great but how about reforming Law Enforcement, FBI, and Homeland Security, NSA, CIA, the Justice Department etc. I think they are causing most of the problems which could be causing people to turn to terrorist organizations and or lawlessness. Joblessness isn’t helping the population and it seems to be rampant and purposeful with the Obama administration, especially since the introduction of Obama Care and his sequestration hissy fits. Is it any wonder? There is a post about Jesus of the Synoptic Gospels having a hissy fit over a fig tree – kind of like Obama’s personality which is unreasonable which I wrote about called:

The Fig Tree – Blessed are the Barren

Also I am concerned about welfare and food stamps programs in the USA since Obama seems to pursue or hire others to pursue partakers of these programs which I think is odd since he should be trying to find them jobs so they do not need these programs as Rudy Guiliani did in New York City.

IF YOU GO TO THE SECTION WITH DENNIS MILLER HE SEEMS TO BE SIGNALING ABOUT WELFARE RECIPIENTS AND OBAMA IN THE NEXT POST CALLED :

Obama is Slaying the Senate

I have noticed a lot of crimes seem to involve those people signed up in these programs and I wonder if that isn’t how Obama or the mob or terrorist organizations or other agencies of government recruit criminals or mold criminals via these programs. It helps to have their information, their pictures, their lousy circumstances or desperation and possibly these organizations use techniques of some kind to manipulate them to do lousy stinkin stuff and then eliminate them as well. Don’t forget about the Neocats who seem to thrive on others demise and are in high places.

Hoax massacres seem to work for him plus he gets free publicity and gets to pose with his victims.

But Hollywood

LOVES

it.

It works for him and them, but it will not last. It is temporary.

Clarence Thomas: Obama ‘Approved By The Elites’

Because He Says What They ‘Expect From A Black Person’

Obama the entertainer telling jokes at his Correspondence dinner with quite a few Hollywood producers and actors in the audience. Oh I thought it was a Correspondents Dinner not a Hollywood venue.

Hollywood is good at deception and hoaxes. I’m pretty positive they helped because I did watch one of the dad’s of an alleged victim of Newtown massacre trying out for his part. Laughing and then walked up to the podium and got in character which took about 20 seconds and started his sadness and reminiscing. It was pretty disgusting.

I HATE THAT.

There was quite a bit of unease as if some of them had to be there.

Obama is sinister and has good writers which makes for a strange and bumpy night for some.

I noticed others who have succumbed  (you have to fight against sucking his thumb) or you turn into his succubus and he has many of those and they are a dime a dozen and are expendable such as Gabrielle Giffords. He used her and her hubby is using her now. Pathetic sadism and masochism in this story. But I think the real target was the judge that was killed at that time. He probably knew about Eric Holder in Fast and Furious before or after and this administration believes in using a crisis and they  sure have done that against arms and yet Fast and Furious was about arms and anyway he does have a way of turning the tables as I just bet he did in regards to that massacre

…….just a conjecture of course, but a pretty good one. Until you experience quite a few of his escapades it is hard to notice but he has established a pattern. It is self evident.

He needs to be declawed, defanged, and is eunichized, shaved, his jaws wired shut so he may not speak,

put in a straight jacket, disarmed, imprisoned in a mental institute, lobotomized,

and last but not least de-thumbed.

Talk about obnoxious, not to mention his “god gift” jog.

Let Michelle serve him Hummus shakes.

———————————————————————————————

JEEPERS CREEPERS, MICHELLE

WHERE”D YOU GET THOSE EYES?

Speaking of Michelle I wonder why she was at Benghazi?

——————————————————————————————–

Untitled7

Untitled4bitch

images-2

Very similar profile and hairline…..hmmmmmmmmmmm, though she has changed her eyebrows. You can see where they used to be. She has raised her eyebrows in fact she paints them on or has had them tattooed and now she has bangs. ……………….Stands like a woman and wearing sandals in heels and looks like the pants are rolled up. Yep they are. Od terrorist. Feminine. Nice arms too. Nostrils similar. Similar mouth. Her cheeks have improved must have had some work done. Yep. She has, now she has cheek bones. IN her earlier pictures she was a bit flat. Geez I guess if we could figure out when Michelle had work done on her eyes because the person in the picture closeup at Benghazi looks as if that person’s eyes are swollen as if that person had plastic surgery recently and was recovering. ANd by golly Michelle’s eyes sure have improved and it can’t be by aging so it must be because of surgery. Her forehead also has improved since then. Yea the person at Benghazi looks swollen in the face also.

nm_michelle_obama2

 
Yep the person in the picture
at Benghazi is Michelle Obama.
 
I wonder what in the world
she was doing there with arms?
 
Obama said : 
“Only Michelle has the right to bear arms.”
 
IS THIS WHY?
Isn’t it time to haul the Obamas in for questioning?

Michelle Obama refers to herself as ‘single mother’
A very caring woman who terrorizes and weeps over her victims.

Saudi News Site: Michelle Obama

Visited Saudi National in Hospital on Thursday

for a little while anyway then she has surgery

—————————————————————————————————————————

Then we’ll give Eric Holder some improvements……………….

Obama blames American guns for Mexican deaths:

‘Most of the guns used to commit violence here in Mexico come from the United States’

AMAZING TURNAROUND! Lets not forget Fast and Furious also.

Obama will try anything and everything to stir things up anywhere he can. He is shameless.

UNREPENTENT TO BE SURE.

Could be the new Benghazi witnesses are scaring him. INTERESTING!

PATTERNS

LIKE A SERIAL KILLER EVENTUALLY IT CATCHES UP TO THE KILLERZZZZ!

Obama sings Mexico’s praises, but some Mexicans hear flat notes

“You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time,

but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.”

Abraham Lincoln(attributed)
16th president of US (1809 – 1865

If we had secure borders we would not have that problem.

But Obama doesn’t want borders similar to

Pope Benedict who dreamed of a world without BORDERS. 

Years ago the Roman Catholic Hierarchy wouldn’t allow their people to read the bible now the Pope wants people to stop reading books and Obama misunderstood and thought he meant borders of countries or is it the other way around? Hmmmm

MENDING WALL

Robert Frost

“Good fences make good neighbors.”

Those that collude with him knowingly for profit will have humongous regrets. Colluding in deception has a price.

But I do believe in miracles so in time these things will pass and so will he

and he will be forgotten

like a bad dream.

One thing for sure HE GETS OLD and I think he is the most irritating person anyone has ever met or seen.

Who was his mother? Our Lady of Fatima? or is it Paris?

If so no wonder she’s always weeping.

 If we could find out who his real mother was it might help us not to make the same mistake as she did.

He is disgustingly gross. period.

———————————–

I lay a great deal of the responsibility for the state of our nation today on President Obama and I believe he needs to to go.

WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO IMPEACH THE PRESIDENT?

CAN OUR SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPS DO THE RIGHT THING?

DO THEY HAVE THE RIGHT STUFF or are THEY JUST BLUFFING?

20101007-200626-pic-4304928741_s160x132

Rep. Trey Gowdy: ‘Explosive’ Benghazi hearings

‘coming quickly

This is someone to watch……..>

Cruz: Obama Pushing Citizenship Because He Wants Immigration Reform To Fail

Ted Cruz challenges Joe Biden to debate about gun control

It wouldn’t be fair. LOL

I think a debate between Feinstein and Biden might be “an even playing field.”

I am thankful for people like Alex Jones and others who have had to take a lot of criticism for their research. I sure wouldn’t disregard his findings and/or ridicule him because it looks like he is pretty close to being right. After my research of JFK and his assassination and  what I found out nothing surprises me anymore which helped me with my bible studies and imagining what was occurring at that time when Jesus came and vice-versa.

PUTIN: Bombing shows U.S. mistake…

 Putin is a big mistake and making sense of his stupidity is useless.

Who cares what Putin thinks…He’s a nut ball self serving tyrant and a no good leader and cares less about his people or any people that’s why he and Obama get along so well.

Can we send them to the moon with the leaders of Iran and North Korea and Michelle. They can fight over her and I’m sure she would enjoy it. 

————————————-

Today it seems that everything we do is being watched and I believe that is partially why the NSA complex is in existence to do and I have my suspicions of other kinds of activities.

JFK warned us about losing our privacy under the guise of safety. Well that is upon us now. What happened to Ashley Judd and Sen. McConnell is a good example of these kind of politics. Obviously it is the religion of Paul that has gotten us to this ugly situation. I do not believe that God judges men by their thoughts. He knows we have a lot of confusing deception to work through and he is there if you believe. The ones that don’t believe don’t get it at all and are aiding and abetting without realizing it and he knows that. Sometimes we get used even when we do believe and he knows that too. We are inundated with others who would like to screw us up in their words and deeds, or pummel us with unforgiving innuendos and more. You have to fight to keep your minds from insanity these days because there are those that would love to see you lose it because it benefits their cause or religion etc, and there are many ways they are able to push someone over the edge which I believe is occurring frequently. I don’t really know how God judges but if he judged us by our thoughts I would be in BIG TROUBLE. Sometimes I have thoughts that are absolutely looney sometimes and I work through it. Everything we see and hear affects us and our minds have to process the information we get since so much of it is false information thanks to the press, our government and even some clergy. I do think it is possible God judges our intentions based on the surrounding circumstances and our state of mind at the time, but I imagine his judgement to be pretty complex and who knows but one thing I do know is we tend as human beings to fail a lot. So my advice is to keep trying. But the bible says it is Moses that judges us, as I recall. Maybe God doesn’t judge us but molds us when we let him.

I just watched Shepard Smith of Fox News talk today Wed. April 24th about the following occurring on Facebook of the alleged living Boston bomber who think he was framed and Mr. Smith said incredulously “As if they knew.” Well guess what Mr. Shepherd they don’t and nor do you. You assume the information fed to you by whomever is true. It may not be true. Just because you are a reporter or are on a News program doesn’t mean you are not being deceived. If I were a deceiver I would be trying to feed false information to Fox News because you are viewed by millions of people to tip the scales the way I wanted. I have heard so many false reports on Fox and all of the other news agencies as well, and on the internet, radio etc.

Let’s not forget about the Ricin letter scare recently in Washington and what we were told by Fox News and on the internet. There are millions of examples of lousy shallow reporting.

60390_160

And Fox has sure made an example of the fine actress Reese Witherspoon and her husband and she contrived in a rather coquettish fashion. I wonder what movies they are about to produce? Maybe they had no choice. The more I see these public displays by Hollywood actors and actresses, producers and the more I see these hoaxes the more I detest Hollywood and what it stands for. They really do hurt themselves in their publicity stunts.

“DO YOU KNOW WHO I AM?” she said.

Isn’t Reese Witherspoon related to the Hearst family?

Let’s ask George Ganswein. LOL

I really hate false propaganda!

HOW LOW WILL YOU GO?

Dealey Plaza,

Dallas, Texas                                                                                                                                                   It hurtz, don’t it?

dealey

Apparently Pretty LOW!

I suggest the Hearsts, the Gansweins, the Popes, the Obamas, the Clintons, the Bushes, the Grahams, the Witherspoons, Hollywood, the Press read about their mental disorder:

God complex

I believe that the Boston Bomber should have been given his rights at the very start. Why should he talk to those that want to kill him and those that will lie about the circumstances. If we don’t hold the powers that wield  that power to account then he should have a really good lawyer since he is a citizen. If we don’t make our government trustworthy and honest how can we expect it of the citizens. It has to be mutual. The interviews of his grieving mother should not have occurred and were an infringement of the rights of the accused and of her, but she probably is unaware in her state of the presses abuse of her and her sons. The press is biased and have taken advantage of her for their agenda.

The press have abused their own power and might to make it meaningless. When the cop told his many stories someone in the press should have confronted the cops, especially Greta Van Susterne (she is a lawyer), but she obliged the cop and let the various discrepancies pass by. Obviously she prefers her cushy lifestyle over her duty and as far as I’m concerned she’s as dishonest as they are. I think maybe she is in the wrong job and should work for the Vatican, perhaps she already does.

Now Fox says the FBI are investigating the mother of the alleged Boston bombers so does the press work for the FBI or visa-versa?

I have a feeling it is the FBI that works for the press and the press work for the Vatican.

Oh what a tangled web we weave,
When first we practise to deceive!

Sir Walter ScottMarmion, Canto vi. Stanza 17.

===============================

Friday April 26th 2013

Today Obama said he wants to get jobs for the Syrian people but first he wants to respond in some way to the alleged use of chemical weapons in Syria as he said while referring to Abdullah (probably the king of Saudi Arabia because he wants to impress him) and he wants to work with Jordan’s king. He just got back from visiting the George Bush Library in Dallas, Texas. Is that why he has been on the stump trying to raise money for the George Bush Library? I thought by now he would have built his own. He said that he would build a library but he must have been talking about George’s library and I thought by now he would be resting and he seems to be on the road a bunch stirring up trouble. Ever protective of his allah and his box in Mecca.

Can you imagine Obama getting the Syrians jobs, that is the funniest thing he has ever said.

He’s not a comedian, but good try.

I love humor and I’m surprised if Katie Couric went after Joan Rivers. That woman is funny. I don’t take anything she says seriously because she means to be funny. To be honest I didn’t watch the show in question and don’t plan to because I have things to do but seems like an odd story.

Especially liked Joan Rivers joke about what it is like to have a baby. She will always be remembered for that, I think and other funny things.

I just don’t like Obama’s humerus, nor Michelle’s hummus. If she serves that to her guests I’m surprised her guests would ever want to return.

Here have some navy bean smeared on a  cracker ….NO THANKS!

Women using so much Botox it’s stopped working:

Users develop antibodies making treatment less effective

Maybe someone should warn Michelle Obama before her eyebrows return to where they are supposed to be instead of her hair line. Perhaps they will come up with a solution to raise her eyes to her eyebrows, but then you have to worry about the nose next and the mouth. Maybe she should just give up the botox and let her eyebrows fall where they may, but then she would need longer bangs. There is always the eyebrow tattoo but then what would she tell her kids?

Here is a lovely princess and the portrait painting of her a year or so ago did not do her justice:

Kate Middleton lends voice to children’s hospices

She sure outshines our First Lady and so natural and seems to like other peoples kids, unlike our

First Lady and to top it off she doesn’t have fangs, I mean bangs.

Another fine lady Charlize Theron doing some great work in Africa.

5 billion dollars aid of 16 billion dollars comes from America. That’s quite a big proportion.

Charlize Theron’s fight for an AIDS-free generation

I wonder, does Saudi Arabia contribute?

How about Jordan, Egypt, Yemen, and all those European countries and how about Turkey and Russia?

And the Vatican? Or are they too busy trying brainwash the young and desperate, murder bystanders, and take over the world.

But Michelle’s heart probably goes out to them, though. Wait….. does she have another vacation coming soon?

Maybe she can pop by after shopping.

Here’s a lady with some true grit:

Palin fires up NRA crowd, hits Obama for using Newtown families

“Now I see that the mayor of New York now wants to ban public displays of legal tobacco products,” she said, referring to his recent push to keep tobacco products out of sight at stores in order to de-glamorize the product.

“I tell ya,” she said, as she pulling out a pack of chewing tobacco. “Don’t make me do it.”

Textbook case of bias? Parents say school reader is biased vs. Israel

Bias is unavoidable. I’m biased and proud of it. The question was crude and ridiculous for kids and that is what we have to fight. I think the public school system is showing that it’s a failure. I have noticed a lot bullying in the schools and it is causing some suicides in these schools. I think it is purposefully done to a select few because of who was elected President. I think they are deliberately singling them and going after some of the kids relentlessly.

I hear the new school teaching system called C Scope is hated by the students and the faculty. I wonder if C represents Catholic or Cat as in NeoCatechumenal Way. I heard that when the Neocatechumenal Way forced itself on the Roman Catholics in Japan there were many more suicides than normal. I think it is related.

Is that worth hating?

Sometimes hate is a good thing. LOVE has a lot of forms. Does Gwyneth love an increase in the suicide rate?

Let’s hope not. I’m pretty sure she hates that, if she is loving.

When the tsunami hit Japan while at the same point in time Pope Benedict was trying to force the Neocatechumenal Way on the Japanese Roman Catholic hierarchy and they were resisting because of the increased suicide rate Obama tweeted about the arrival of aid to Japan. But it was what he said and I cannot remember verbatim but it was as if they were forced to accept the aid because of a man made event which I believe some government agencies are abusing such as HAARP and who knows Obama seems to be close to Putin and the Vatican and they have their weapons that affect the earth to cause devastation to force themselves and their way. I think Billy Graham or Franklin Graham were involved and they are shills of the Vatican so no matter what the Japanese were in a catch-22 situation. This is how Obama and the other bullies work. IF you do not know about HAARP you should investigate.

I’m sure Nancy Pelosi appreciates this power. What a wicked lady.

I have heard that the teachers cry about this new teaching system so it must be pretty bad. This new type teaching started on Obama’s watch and just like everything he does turns to sewage. There are online teaching schools that are free and I would suggest if anyone is being picked on as my child was to leave the system ASAP. My daughter ended up in a hospital because of bullying but survived and is doing better. We left the public system. An acquaintance of hers died recently because she committed suicide because of bullying at that same school and I’m sorry she had not been handled better. One woman (I spoke about her further up in this post) know is a teacher and her daughter is being bullied and I talked to her a few times over a few months and things had not improved and told her about the free online classes both times and she still has her in school. I guess the job won. She was the one that told me about the unhappiness of the teachers, faculty and the students. She and her daughter are good people and should not have to go through this ridiculous jumping through hoops. Nor should we have had to go through what we went through. Insanity is running our government and many cowards who instead of doing the right thing for their constituents and starting the impeachment process are making excuses, but that girl that committed suicide is their responsibility to some degree because of their inaction. I guess our Islamic socialist President doesn’t like other beliefs and in particular my belief which proves to me even more that I’m right.

So Gwyneth what would you do?

Someday you will have to get off the fence for your children. It’s easy to call others haters if you don’t have to deal with haters.

It’s time to leave the public schools. Time to stop paying our government tax dollars to run these schools

if they can’t do better than that.

Apparently Roman Catholics, the Vatican, the UN, EU (taken over by the RC) don’t care much for Jews and they do think the Palestinians have a right to act like demons such as killing Jews at worldly events like the Olympics or blowing airplanes up, dumping a Jewish man in a wheel chair off of a Cruise ship or drag a man (possibly a Palestinian man) behind them on motorcycles or they think that Saudi Arabians have the right to blow up the Twin Towers in NY. I think they have their heads screwed on their butts and vice versa. Appeasement has not worked with Islam and never will. Since the RC created Islam then let the RC deal with them on their turf in ROME.

Let the Vatican give their territory to the Palestinians since

IT’S their baby

if they care so much for the Palestinians,

I’m sure the Palestinians would rejoice.

I bet the exPope would love to share his art, artifacts, relics, and his palaces with their brethren, the Palestinians. I’ll bet the Neocats and the Palestinians would have a lovely time together. They could eat raw chicken and dance at each others weddings and get drunk on each others deceptions and drag each other around for the fun of it. And I bet Jordan and Saudi Arabia could benefit by giving their palaces too for their causez. Give the Palestinians a chance and give them a few oil wells while you are at it to even things up,

or as Joseph Biden calls it “level the playing field.”

Seems when the Obamas come to town bad things happen. My family survived, but I know of some who didn’t. I believe, he and her and the spirit they bring is evil and they will suffer the consequences soon. Perhaps they already have and we just haven’t heard about it. I have noticed her looking pretty bad and frazzled and very toothy lately. Anyway the spirit and the god he prays to is evil and the one she upholds obviously is evil but I have a feeling it is a combo of witchcraft, voodoo and hinduism which is also evil and warped as they are warped, twisted, decrepit, insane  and entirely dumb. I’m surprised they can talk and walk at the same time.

Why does Roman Catholicism, and the Vatican, France and the EU and the UN want a one world religion if this is what you get? Therein is part of the problem trying to form a One world anything.

Try as they may it’s a big loss for them and it should be because

it isn’t true.

It won’t work.

In fact they will be eating their humerus and their own hummus all the day long.

“A day is a thousand years as a thousand years is a day.”

I wonder if Obama goes to war because of the alleged use of chemical weapons (they keep harping on it for the last few years maybe eventually it will happen, if Obama has his way for France or the EU or the UN or the Vatican) in Syria does that mean he will send troops into Iran like George Bush responded to the terror of 9-11 of the world trade centers and the Pentagon by Saudi terrorists armed with box cutters and planes and instead of going to Saudi Arabia he sent troops to Iraq. Must have been General Collin Powell’s great idea or King Abdullah.

Here is a video of some evidence of the Sandy Hook scam, some fake falsified reports from Fox News and  also includes Gulf War scam that took place in Saudi Arabia with blue screen and some reporters faking patriot missile scud missile alarm at a hotel: I guess this is how our Press and government work to scam our population. At the time it worked although this was a bit hokey but since we were not used to this kind of deception I can see how we might have been fooled:

I wonder, did it work for Gen. Collin Powell?

Syria: Al-Qaeda’s battle for control of Assad’s chemical weapons plant

I think Obama is on the side of aL Qaeda, could care less about Syria or their jobs, America or anywhere or anyone else.

He seems like he has been egging them on to use chemical weapons. He likes destruction. I don’t think he cares who uses them either because either way he wins and both sides lose.

Watched Christina Gabrielle on Fox and her discussion about why Christians want Syria’s Assad to stay in power is because his leadership protected the Christians. That sounds feasible and sounds as if the that is the true reason for the uprising in Syria.

Take these one at a time and see what occurs as a reaction.

After all it was the Saudis that destroyed many people in the twin towers in Manhattan. They started it so we should start there.

Someone needs to bomb the shit out of MECCA and its box

and level the Dome of the Rock

and any other Islamic shrine or temple for starters and anything to do with Fatima.

It would be easy to do with no lives lost by giving ample warning.

Then look into the 3 egyptian temples given as gifts by Egypt to 3 countries one in Manhattan, another in the Netherlands, and one in Spain and destroy them.

Destroy Notre Dame of Paris and the Courtyard of the Gentiles.

And don’t forget about the Taj Mahal

It seemed to affect Jackie Kennedy in a bad way and probably is some sort of power point.

These places seem to be affecting the population and Islamic people in a bad way. It would help them.

Get rid of the power points with no lives lost and see what happens. 

And then discuss what to do with the Vatican and the UN.

Let people worship whom they believe in in their own homes with their own families.

HOMELAND INSECURITY

AMERICANS FEAR GOVERNMENT MORE THAN TERROR

Astonishing poll results for 1st time since 9/11 hijackings

That is why we need to discuss what to do with the Vatican and the UN. They seem to be a source of the problems and affecting world leaders, the press, world governments etc.

Who came up with the excuse for Benghazi and it was a lie? Father Lombardi of the Vatican and the Pope’s spokesman. Everyone from Pres. Obama, Rice of the State Department, Clinton of the State Department, FBI people, Secret Service, CIA and the Press, the Egyptians, the Libyans, etc all of them went along with the lie about a dumb video tape (which I have not seen and don’t intend to see because it is ridiculous).

They are all being manipulated by the Vatican and the UN.

Obama: ‘I’m Not Familiar’ With Benghazi Whistleblowers Being Threatened

Watch his language. He uses words differently then what a normal sane person would. He probably had heard about it, he probably knew about it, he probably threatened them in a myriad of ways, but whether he is familiar is another story.

Deceptive language is his forte his art. That is how he slimes out of everything. He is parsing his words in case he has to appear before Congress and the Senate. Everything he does is about him and protecting himself . Why didn’t he say “I did not know…..”

Because he did know, that’s why, but he is not “familiar” with the whistleblowers.  Get it? He is not related to them. He is not intimate with them. Some words have many meanings and he uses words to his advantage. The press has got to get super specific with him and basically corner him. You can’t get anywhere with one or two questions but you have to question his own words. Needle him and pretty soon he’ll lose his cool and divulge something. You have to rattle him or you will be unsuccessful, unless your success is his success.

I heard that there was an article on Drudge that lasted about an hour and I guess was pulled by someone about the russians (whoever it was) sent a message to the US that the US was using Benghazi for arming the Syrian rebels. It seems to me before we send troops or send arms to the rebels (as is being discussed on Fox News about Obama and his administration) because of some red line that no one really knows has been traversed with chemical weapons or if it has by whom that we ought to find out if the US was trading arms to the rebels at Benghazi before we send arms again to arm rebels who may or may not be our enemy as well.

It seems to me that it is pretty evil to arm rebels and threaten/goad Assad against using chemical weapons. It is like asking for it. Since Gen. Collin Powell was so sure about these weapons in Iraq that were not found in Iraq and attacking Iraq when it was the Saudis that hijacked some planes on Sept 11th and used as bombs against Americans in New York and Washington that possibly Gen. Collin Powell may have an agenda no one knows about and Obama wants to fulfill this agenda.

I think it would be wise to find out about Benghazi before we make another HUGE MISTAKE.

And find out if and by whom arms were traded.

Talk about ridiculous.

How do we come up with the numbers of dead in Syria? Is it done as a daily average?

Do we go in and count them?

Obama probably would love to arm the rebels now so that he won’t get caught having armed them already illegally or whoever it was that did arm them illegally if that is true. Seems prudent to get Benghazi opened up and find out what happened before we get embroiled in Syria. I would hate to see America end up in Lebanon instead of Syria like we were in Iraq instead of Saudi Arabia. But then we might over shoot and end up in Turkey.

——————

A few days back they found landing gear from one of the planes that crashed into the Twin Towers.

HMMMMMMMMMMM

Rewriting History?:

I hear Jeb Bush is hoping to run for the Presidency. Not a good idea. I don’t think he will be able to get past his decision for the death of the woman who was mauled (my interpretation) by her husband and left for almost dead and allowed him to starve her and dehydrate her even though her family wanted to keep her alive. I don’t think Jeb Bush can swing past that decision as Governor of Florida. Do you?

JEB BUSH STEPS IN FOR SCHINDLER-SCHIAVO

This article says that Jeb Bush stepped in on behalf of the woman and her family against the husband …….Funny that’s not what I recall happened. I guess WND really wants another Bush in office and willing to rewrite history. I think if Jeb Bush wanted her to live, she would have lived…..they starved her and

the result was she did not live. 

I guess WND wants to have their cake and eat it too.

Don’t get me wrong I like the Bushes and especially Laura Bush for her contribution although I don’t know them personally. I think they seem like a wonderful family but it is time for new people to backtrack on some infamous mistakes made by many Presidents and government officials now that we see the results of those decisions and see our present situation. The UN is not in our Constitution or the Bill of Rights, neither is King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia or Putin of Russia or the Vatican or the EU. We are not their subjects. I don’t care how much money or oil they have or how much we owe them, it’s time to shed their weight. We don’t need their confusion or input. All we get is lies from them and it’s time to turn inward secure our borders and take care of our problems without interference from them. It is apparent we need to work on ourselves here in the US.

It would be nice to get someone who cared about the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights

and the sovereignty of the US

to be President

so I hope the Republican Party will look for someone as their candidate who will take that job seriously

 since that is the responsibility of the President of the US.

I’m hoping for a Ted Cruz, Rand Paul and Mark Rubio combo-ticket.

They have proved themselves to have guts and courage in the face of Obama’s idiocracy. Thiis is Obama’s response to that, I guess he is reading my blog posts:

“And on the 2016 election, the president noted in self-referential irony that potential Republican candidate Sen. Marco Rubio wasn’t qualified because he hasn’t even served a full term in the Senate. Obama served less than four years of his six-year Senate term before he was elected president in 2008.”

Actually, I think Ted Cruz would be best at protecting the foundation of our country such as the Constitution and the Bill of Rights but both Rand Paul and Mark Rubio have great attributes as well and have great potential.

Cruz 2016

MILLER: Rick Perry says Obama wants to

‘disarm the American public’

Obama is in Mexico to stir up trouble

because that is MO

and everything he says is BS

HE IS AFRAID OF WHAT HE

‘IS RESPONSIBLE FOR” IN BENGHAZI.

Chris Christy is a lousy choice for a nominee. He is a slob and Obama’s ass kisser.

If Eric Bolling is pushing for Christie (probably under the table kind of reasons)

as a nominee you know something has popped in his brain affecting most of his brain cells.

One thing for sure

taking down the Ten Commandments was our biggest mistake in this country.

Ever since then our country has spiraled downward. I believe it could make a big difference to re-erect those standards for the future, present and the past. We ceased to be a Christian nation then but the powers that be have faith, hope and love the

BIG BANG THEORY

which is unreasonable, destructive and chaotic which seems to coincide with Michelle’s bangs.

Perhaps that will be the end and not the beginning.

Let’s reform our government to be what it was intended to be and I’m sure the citizenry will flourish and get along. I do believe our government is responsible for the unrest because of many bad decisions, fraud, and abuse.

The Gettysburg Address

I guess Nap0litano is trying to arm Obama’s Secret Army so they won’t have to run against such a formidable trio.

Remember when Obama took office the first time when everyone started breaking their bones. Hillary Clinton, Napolitano, The Pope, and Sarcozy of France or the other guy from France. Anyway lots of broken appendages. Seemed like Obama was a force to be reckoned with. Well, he is weaker now. His cracks are showing. He is losing ground and people are seeing his true colors.

He will do anything to avoid impeachment and avoid recounting his INTENT at Benghazi.

“Why he sent them there. ” etc.

That is why he should be held accountable and we should not do anything he suggests

especially at the bequest of Saudi Arabia, the UN, the EU, the State Department or the Vatican.

They need us more than we need them. Let’s ditch their influence and be independent of them in every way and make sound decisions in our country for it’s people and those that come to our country to be citizens.

Watched Eric Bolling of Fox News talk to Rand Paul today about security cameras and Eric Bolling is happy with surveillance cameras everywhere whereas Rand Paul said something to the effect that there needs to be a balance etc in that regard. Trading privacy for security is a catch-22 and Eric Bolling knows this.

What if there is a religion (Bollings Religion/Catholicism) that uses another religion it created (Islam) to create havoc so that the religion (Bollings religion/Catholicism) could control and watch everyone else and they don’t care a hoot about anyone else. Of course Eric Bolling is not being surveilled because he is “Catholic” but his religion is able to peer into everyone else’s lives. I’m sure his indiscretions are over looked because of his religion as Catholicism overlooks what the terrorist religion of Islam does because it benefits Catholicism. They work together. Eric Bolling wants to have his cake and eat it too. He and his brethren will create any false situation to keep control even at the expense of everyone else’s freedom or lives.They are bullies, liars, and thieves and Eric Bolling obviously is a liar. What Catholics and people like Eric Bolling don’t realize is that they are on the precipice themselves and are about to go over the edge of a state they do not want and they will be on the other end of the stick. I would like to see cameras in Eric Bolling’s bedroom, his car, his wife and her friends, his kids and their friends, his living room, his bathroom and lets see if he changes his mind. They are control freaks of the worst kind and they have created a situation that is unbearable for most people other than themselves and they know it. THEY ARE DEMONIC and DEAD INSIDE because they would trade the truth for a lie to be in control and as a result they will lose it all.

What Eric Bolling and other control freaks don’t realize is that they themselves are being tested.

I watched him another time playing dodge ball with his cohorts using a nerf ball. Funny thing is that day he looked like a nerf. His hair looked like plastic and so did his makeup. It was so surreal. This may be when the popping occurred.

If they create a false religion to control the masses of course they are willing to lie about everything else, because they benefit by controlling others. They profit from it. Eric Bolling obviously profits from it and he is happy at the expense of others.

The day it turns on them is a day I will be free. It isn’t very far away.

The Five were at the Correspondent’s dinner because they are tools of Obama. They have been absorbed and assimilated as Hollywood etc

and much of Boston, Newtown, and New Jersey. West, Texas and little by little, town by town, kind of like a germ that spreads its tentacles. You will notice the personalities of people in those areas that are being assimilated change and attack the ones that are watching. Here is a good example of a man abusing another man because he is aware. You can break free of the borg but it takes being aware of the deception to begin with and it takes work.

Infowars Confrontation: Boston Resident Blasts Dan Bidondi Over Marathon Bombing Conspiracy Theories (VIDEO)

Bullying, ridiculing, mocking, etc is their way to silence the truth seekers. It is the way cults work.

Tell No Man

Sen. Rand Paul on security vs. privacy

By the way you are being watched via TV, computer and now phones. I have noticed. If it has a screen and is wired to the system you are being watched so this issue of privacy has already been breached big time. Either Rand Paul doesn’t realize it to the extent that it already is or he is lying. I’m a bit of a fan of Rand Paul, of his courage mostly. I liked his filibuster and thought he made a dent in american politics enough to get others to notice. That is a big positive in my estimation. I’m sure if you ask the Press they would tell you the truth about privacy. LOL They are managing us. Manipulating us, interfering in our lives to conform us and not in a good way for the most part (partially because of their religion) playing god. I know it and they know I know it so much so I have had responses by them to me which is quite strange. However I hope they are well meaning, just deceived themselves. Until they realize the damage they cause by not being truthful they will have to be managed as well by it’s critics such as me and a few others that have noticed the lies and conspiracies and take them seriously.

While it sounds preposterous, it’s rather real. 

As far as drones are concerned it’s much further along than the citizens realize same goes for robotics which basically are drones of a different shape. The future is upon the present.

Bob Becker is correct in my opinion about student visas. I applaud him for his good sense on that issue. It is a privilege to get educated and to come to the US (although these days that’s debatable because of the lack of privacy and the deliberate manipulation by the press and the government.) Saudis should not be allowed in the US plain and simple after September 11 but somehow they have managed to confuse our government otherwise we would have invaded Saudi Arabia instead of Iraq. I can’t imagine General Patton would have been so easily fooled. It has to do with who is in our government and their intentional ruination of our government because of their religion which my CBS news transcriptions of the assassination of JFK illustrate pretty well which can be found on

Merangue’s Blog

When diplomats come to our country they should have to live by our laws and if they break the laws they should have to be held accountable as any citizen in our country.

I have heard of rapes and murders etc going unpunished here because of their (diplomats) nationality and that has got to be changed. THAT OUGHT TO MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE:) Being a diplomat does not give you the license to break the laws without the same repercussions of the average citizen. They should not have diplomatic immunity. And that goes for the press, the clergy, the CIA, the Secret Service, the FBI, the NSA, and HOMELAND SECURITY and our military.

Now because Americans are questioning the right of student visas because of the SAUDIS Fox news is already discussing student loans of american citizens. This is how the vatican works, if you question their power they punish like the sequestration punishments Obama wielded.

THEY ARE THE MOB.

THEY ARE BASTARDS AND HAVE BASTARDIZED OUR GOVERNMENT AND OUR COUNTRY.

AND FOX NEWS SEEMS TO BE THEIR TOOL.

Has it occurred to anyone that President Obama might be Saudi Arabian? As far as I’m concerned he might as well be AL QaeDA or the real Osama Bin Laden. He acts like it.

One thing for sure everyone knows that he is a BASTARD.

Which reminds me of a Woody Allen movie where the butcher is running around with a knife yelling Bastard. Can’t remember which one though, but it was funny.

If the clergy had really taken their jobs seriously they would have told the truth and taught it.

There are many people that would have been better people and better off had they had the truth. My dad was a really great dad but because he was taught lies in church he wasn’t what he could have been. Just goes to show that priests aren’t fathers. Heck they can’t even marry to know what being a dad takes so how in the world could they understand or care for that matter what it takes to raise a child. Now we have a bunch of dads who are cowards and are only good at beating woman down in a myriad of ways and a bunch of dumb priests running the Vatican who are good for nothin’ fanatics affecting world policy and agencies in our government and nuns teaching nonsense. Catholicism is really a sham of a religion and so are it’s daughters and especially Islam, but of course the mob loves them. It’s their bread and butter and visa-versa. They’re a joke and a bad one at that.

They have godfathers in the mob and bunch of fathers in the church and burka’d women they call nuns.

The bible says to call no one father but our Father in heaven.

NO WONDER!

The bible speaks of these times and says that men will be rarer than Ophir’s gold.

These are those days. 

By now Obama should have been impeached and that is a testimony to the lack of real men in this country.

By the way with all of the government escapades and false massacres, all the false stories on the news about the Boston bombers by the government agencies he went forward then he went backward etc over his brother and the extremely red liquid which never turned as real blood does to a brown and moving the fence line here and there around a white bag and bombs only blowing in one direction I think it was a false flag event in Boston more than likely and a set up. I think they are extremely afraid or why go to these extreme. If a cause is just you don’t need to make up lies. Obviously their causes are unjust. Basically we have mobsters the lowest of the low trying to run things and they just aren’t qualified. They make a mess of things and begin to look like the Three Stooges but in bigger numbers. Just plain dumb and they turn on each other as it seems has occurred with the FBI, the Justice Department, Parks and Recreation, Homeland Security, the CIA, the State Department with all of its diplomats, the Secret Service, the President, and Press and the Clergy because most of them have been corrupted by each other. There are only a few that have kept their dignity and brains while the others are insanely ridiculous.

Thieves and hustlers. Rotten to the core.

————————–

There ought to be a law written against impersonating ELVIS PRESLEY.

It has got to stop. Believe me, I know.

—————————————————

Why follow the Synoptic Jesus if he is not good as the 3 Synoptic Gospels maintain?

Makes no sense at all!

Follow Jesus of the Gospel of John. He believes he is good. You will be glad you did.

It helps if you believe who you are and he did while the Synoptic Jesus wasn’t sure who he was. Here is a good post demonstrating his confusion:

Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven

Sometimes actions speak louder than words.

How did they behave in comparison to each other?

Certainly we should take what he said and compare it to the other versions or gospels and not just take it at face value. We should take our brains and use them to gain an understanding of what is being said or portrayed and realize that there are many people who would like to abolish his words altogether, perhaps they tried to back then as well. He was crucified which ought to tell you something. Recently there have been crucifixions in Egypt, I think, or maybe it was Saudi Arabia that I read about. Obviously he offended people back then or they wouldn’t have crucified him. This moment of silence when a tragedy occurs is another example of political correct madness and I resent it even though the intent by most people is for respect but for some it is for silencing others.

The truth matters and silence is not always golden. If it were then we would not have voices.

The biggest difference between the true Jesus and the false Jesus is who he glorified!

It was neither Peter, Paul nor Mary!

Jesus in the Gospel of John came in his Fathers name:

John 5:43
I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not:

if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.

—————————————

Exodus 3:6-15

6Moreover he said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. And Moses hid his face; for he was afraid to look upon God.

 7And the LORD said, I have surely seen the affliction of my people which are in Egypt, and have heard their cry by reason of their taskmasters; for I know their sorrows;

 8And I am come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up out of that land unto a good land and a large, unto a land flowing with milk and honey; unto the place of the Canaanites, and the Hittites, and the Amorites, and the Perizzites, and the Hivites, and the Jebusites.

 9Now therefore, behold, the cry of the children of Israel is come unto me: and I have also seen the oppression wherewith the Egyptians oppress them.

 10Come now therefore, and I will send thee unto Pharaoh, that thou mayest bring forth my people the children of Israel out of Egypt.

 11And Moses said unto God, Who am I, that I should go unto Pharaoh, and that I should bring forth the children of Israel out of Egypt?

 12And he said, Certainly I will be with thee; and this shall be a token unto thee, that I have sent thee: When thou hast brought forth the people out of Egypt, ye shall serve God upon this mountain.

 13And Moses said unto God, Behold, when I come unto the children of Israel, and shall say unto them, The God of your fathers hath sent me unto you; and they shall say to me, What is his name? what shall I say unto them?

 14And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.

 15And God said moreover unto Moses, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, the LORD God of your fathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, hath sent me unto you:

this is my name for ever,

and this is my memorial unto all generations.

He did not say his name would change when Jealous came 

(Exodus 34:14)

or Jesus

or Peter, Paul,  and Mary would come!

Besides what could God the creator be jealous of?

Man? Angels? I don’t think so!

He did not say he would add to his name or subtract from his name!

It is obvious that even the O.T. has been altered!

I guess we have Josephus/Cephas to blame for that,

please read:

Abomination of Desolation Pt 2

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST)

Josephus and His Footprints

The Covenant with Many

The Synoptic “Q Source”

Josephus Flavius admits taking the geneology records and holybooks from the temple in his own writings…..

should we ignore this admission?

——————-

——————-

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

================

Beware Oh brother, beware don’t you listen to the words. The tender lies….

Other articles may be found at :

Merangue’s Blog

December 10, 2011 Posted by | Bible Contradictions, Bible Controversy, Epistles of Paul, False God of Rome, false Synoptic Gospels, Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Image of the Beast, Jesus Christ, Paul, Peter, Q Source, Synoptic Gospels, Synoptic prince of this world, The Q Source, The Synoptic “Q Source”, The Synoptic Gospels, Uncategorized, What Would Jesus Do? | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven


Matthew 16

13When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?14And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.

MARK 8

27And Jesus went out, and his disciples, into the towns of Caesarea Philippi: and by the way he asked his disciples, saying unto them, Whom do men say that I am?28And they answered, John the Baptist; but some say, Elias; and others, One of the prophets


Why would Jesus Christ, the Son of God, ask

Whom do men say that I the Son of man am? or Whom do men say that I am?

If He is the Son of God, wouldn’t He know who he was?

Just kidding.

Wouldn’t he know what they were saying about Him?

The true Jesus Christ, the Son of God, was well aware of what people

were thinking and saying who He was!

=============================================================


Matthew 16:15-17

15He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

16And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.

17And Jesus answered and said unto him, 

Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee,

but my Father which is in heaven.

Mark 8:29

29And he saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?

And Peter answereth and saith unto him,

Thou art the Christ.


===============================================================

Matthew 16:17-20

18And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.19And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

20Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.

This Synoptic Jesus tells Peter who he is……as if he did not know.

Peter just told Jesus who he was, but now Jesus is telling Peter who he is!

He had just miraculously fed 4000 people out of a pittance of food earlier

and he did not want his disciples to tell anyone who he was?

Why were those 4000 people hanging out with him fasting for 3 days

that he fed with a few fishes and a few loaves of bread?

Did the 4000 men not know who they were either?

This is utter nonsense!

What was in their fish?

This is an attempt to build a church on Peter’s name.

=============

Then Jesus charges them to tell no man that he is Jesus the Christ after he goes through this strange conversation with Peter about who he is etc.

=============


The True Messiah knows who he is

and what people were thinking

and even what would happen in the future!

If he didn’t know who he was then how in the world would he expect us to figure it out?

Matthew 21-23

21From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.22Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.23But he turned, and said unto Peter,

Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me:

for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.

Mark 8:30-33

30And he charged them that they should tell no man of him.31And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again.32And he spake that saying openly. And Peter took him, and began to rebuke him.33But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples,

he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan:

for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men.


HUGE CONTRADICTION!


The Gospel of Matthew 6:17 above has Jesus BLESSING Peter and giving Peter the keys to the kingdom

and then tells him that he is the rock which the church will be built upon

and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it

and within a short time (like within the same conversation) Matthew 6:23

Jesus REBUKES Peter

and says that Peter is SATAN!

Not only does he say he is Satan, but also an offense to him!

What happened to the gates of hell not prevailing against the church?

It lasted a whole minute!

This is like a Japanese Monster movie dubbed in English

out of sync!

At the very least the Jesus that “charged them to tell no man” that he was the christ obviously was the anti-christ! The Gospel of Matthew’s Jesus was the antichrist by his own words as recorded in the Gospel of Matthew it seems. You can read the post called Tell No Man linked on Merangue’s Blog.

In the Gospel of John

At the Last Supper,

after Jesus and his apostles had eaten,

He talks to his disciples about who He is and explains Himself to them

and what is going to happen to Him and to them!


Please read!

John 14

John 15

John 16

After he had risen from the grave and visited them

he gives them the HOLY GHOST!


JOHN 20:21-23

21Then said Jesus to them again,

Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you.

22And when he had said this, he breathed on them,

and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:

23Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them;

and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained.


NO CLOVEN TONGUES OF FIRE!

NO SPEAKING IN TONGUES!

NO MIGHTY WIND!

(Consistent with Genesis and the creation of the world and the creation of mankind.)


OBVIOUSLY, JESUS DID NOT GIVE THE KEYS of the KINGDOM TO PETER !!!

There are no keys!

THAT IS PROPAGANDA!

THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW AND MARK

HAVE TURNED THE TRUTH UPSIDE DOWN!

They have managed to make Jesus sound like a lunatic,

which is typical for the Synoptic Jesus!

You either believe in Jesus or you don’t. You believe in God or your don’t. Which God?

I BELIEVE in the Jesus who acted like a sane person which is in the Gospel of John and who he glorified, His Father.

I believe in the Jesus that knew who he was and didn’t need others to tell him.

I think the Synoptic Gospels are like actors/decoys

interacting with a hologram of what they want to have occurred

in order to change facts and twist the truth to replace the truth with fiction and to create confusion.

When doing the CBS transcriptions of the JFK assassination found on Merangue’s Blog I used their film and the reporters reporting and added my two cents of what I saw occurring that they didn’t notice such as the puppet being handed over the fence line at the airport in Dallas to Jackie Kennedy and her tucking the puppet in her roses. The people on the side of the fence line with the President….his entourage are also similar to people interacting with a hologram of the event that is filmed. Some of them act as if they know what is occurring or going to occur and are witnessing it and acting in it at the same time. some of those faces are recognizable. The gospel of Matthew other than the first few chapters does the same thing in a way without a documentary to back it up. 

The genealogy is a different matter and is only found in the Gospel of Matthew. However in a few other posts I cover that subject and my inconclusive conclusions (because I am not a bible scholar and hold no degrees) with the help of a few other apologists who have researched it demonstrate the catch-22 of it’s proof.

The story that goes along with the genealogy account seems to indicate a pact or royal alliance between England and Germany/Rome.

I don’t recall many Jewish people with the name Elizabeth, though I could be wrong. The cousin of Mary and since there seem to be many Mary’s to add to the confusion. One in particular called Mary wife of Chuza which seems to be a BIG CLUE. And then we never hear about Joseph after a certain point. Not a hint. He just disappears. We do however hear about Joseph of Ari-mathea.

Kind of reminds me of Benghazi. Everyone more concerned with the IRS abuses (which by the way have a long history of abuses for the average middle class American) than figuring out about all the lies, the coverup of Benghazi, the UN speech by Barack Obama’s promise/pledge about Islam soon after Benghazi. Even Franklin Graham was insulted by the IRS, or so he says and I don’t recall that he was insulted nor alarmed by Barack Obama’s pledge at the UN,

nor anyone else that I know of.

HMMMMMMMMMMMMM.

What happened to the witnesses? Were they executed by executive order or was it a mandate?

==============================

The Tradition of Christmas

=============================

For those that defend Christmas the tradition such as O’reilly who staunchly and vehemently defends the holiday to honor Jesus why on earth would he laud a musician Herbie Hancock for his religion of Buddhism? Seemed odd to me. I know Herbie Hancock’s music is definitely laudable, but his religion? Course Roman Catholic Jesuits prefer Buddhism to delineating the differences in the gospels which are many. I guess it’s taboo. He just wrote a book called Killing Jesus because he thought or felt that God had prompted him to write it in his third installment of the trilogy about killing:

the first Killing Lincoln and the second Killing Kennedy

and the third of the trilogy and last but not least Killing Jesus.

Watch Bill O’Reilly ‘Surprise’ Obama at the Kennedy Center,

Shake Hands with Snoop Dogg

And by the way I will include at the bottom of the page the flags of the Middle East and parts of North Africa and Italy and many of them are the colors of Christmas except a few. I wondered if since Jesus was Jewish why the colors of Christmas aren’t blue and white instead of green, red and white. Seems odd since the instructions in the Old Testament for certain housing and decor are blue and white and REAL GOLD (not credit!)

Seems to me in honor of Jesus

even though O’reilly admitted Jesus probably wasn’t born in December

we would celebrate his birth with the colors of his country and his ancestry

but then maybe Christmas really isn’t about Jesus.

=======================================

Abomination of Desolation

 Abomination of Desolation Pt 2

The Covenant with Many

CONFIRMATION OF THE COVENANT

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)

Josephus and His Footprints

The Absurdity of Cloven Tongues, Mighty Winds and Proselytes


=================================================

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

The Stone Which the Builders Rejected

The Synoptic “Q Source”

Salute No Man

The Fruits of the Vatican

Screen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.18.28 PM

Screen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.25.44 PM Screen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.24.56 PMScreen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.19.24 PM Screen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.17.30 PMScreen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.16.08 PM

Screen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.20.28 PM

Screen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.17.09 PM

Screen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.13.58 PM

Screen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.20.45 PM

Screen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.27.50 PM

Screen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.27.10 PM

Screen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.13.39 PM

More Posts at

Merangue’s Blog

Here is the flag of IsraelScreen shot 2014-01-02 at 12.25.56 PM

June 16, 2010 Posted by | Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Great Deception, Jesus Christ, Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven, Peter, Synoptic Gospels, Tell no man, The Book of Acts, The Garden of Gethsemane, The Last Supper, The Synoptic Gospels, The Truth, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

The Fig Tree – Blessed are the Barren



Matthew 21:18-20

18Now in the morning as he returned into the city, he hungered.19And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away.20And when the disciples saw it, they marvelled, saying, How soon is the fig tree withered away!21Jesus answered and said unto them, Verily I say unto you, If ye have faith, and doubt not, ye shall not only do this which is done to the fig tree, but also if ye shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; it shall be done.22And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive.

This rendition of Jesus Christ in the gospel of Matthew ie the Synoptic Jesus

is having a hissy fit,

and not only that, he was talking to a fig tree

AND IF THAT ISN’T BAD ENOUGH

SUPPOSEDLY HE HAD A REASON

FOR THIS MADNESS

because it had not produced fruit for him to eat

as he expected because he was hungry that particular morning.

========

If Jesus can feed 5000 men with a few loaves of bread,

why could he not make the fig tree produce fruit for him presently?

========

IF Jesus Christ, the Son of God,

knows what happens 2000 years in advance,

you would think he would know that that fig tree did not have fruit on it

before he hoped to eat figs from it that morning.

Maybe he fasted for too long and lost his good senses. Sounds like Peter in the book of Acts on his rooftop praying and fasting.

==========

WHY WOULD THE disciples marvel at the withering fig tree?

Like I said, if it were cursed by Jesus wouldn’t they expect it to die?

But, of course, this is rubbish!

Why would the disciples want to have faith enough to curse a fig tree?

It is stupid!

IT makes Jesus look insane and his followers look like stupid idiots,

but very Synoptic!

I’m surprised that this SYNOPTIC Jesus Christ didn’t

charge the fig tree to tell no man!

But he does eventually because he is Synoptic!

Please read about the Synoptic Source or rather the SS!

The Synoptic “Q Source”


Mark 11:12-14

12 And on the morrow, when they were come from Bethany, he was hungry:13And seeing a fig tree afar off having leaves, he came, if haply he might find any thing thereon: and when he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for the time of figs was not yet.14And Jesus answered and said unto it, No man eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever. And his disciples heard it.

He comes haply?

Sounds like he was skipping with flowers in his hair.

What did the Synoptic Jesus expect,

if the time of figs was not yet?

Obviously, the fig tree was not ready to bear its fruit!

DUH

IF only Simon of Cyrene had been there!


This is mocking Jesus in the gospel of John when he says his time is not yet!

John 7:6

6Then Jesus said unto them, My time is not yet come: but your time is alway ready.

Jesus Christ did not go around cursing trees!

Jesus Christ had just raised Lazarus who had been dead for four days.

The Jesus that is propagandized in the Synoptic gospels

cursing the fig tree is

FALSE

and may I add…….

INANE!

Why in the world would Jesus Christ, the Son of God, waste his time cursing a fig tree?

IN between these verses in the gospel of Mark, Jesus Christ overturns the tables of the money changers in the temple, but actuality Jesus overturned the tables at an earlier time in the Gospel of John soon after the wedding in Cana.

The Synoptics do not include the wedding in Cana, because the Synoptic authors were not there!

I suppose that is what the fig tree curse mock is all about….

the Synoptic Author was jealous that he was not chosen!

Tell No Man

————————-

The Synoptic writers go to the extreme to make Jesus Christ look like a weirdo,

because He was upset with the money changers

and the degradation of the place of worship

The Temple!

The reason for their extreme ridicule is because

they were the money changers in the place of worship

and  they had turned it into a marketplace!

The Synoptic gospels are trying to confuse events and add their inane teaching

to fill-in space because they are full of air

where the true teaching and true miracles are discarded

and replaced with their

guile!

Please read:

Chief Priests and the Legion

Mark 11:19-22

19And when even was come, he went out of the city.20And in the morning, as they passed by, they saw the fig tree dried up from the roots.21And Peter calling to remembrance saith unto him, Master, behold, the fig tree which thou cursedst is withered away.22And Jesus answering saith unto them, Have faith in God.23For verily I say unto you, That whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith.

Here the author of the gospel of Mark is also mocking Peter “calling into remembrance“.

He calls into remembrance the fig tree that was cursed

moments before as in the gospel of Matthew

and a day later in the gospel of Mark.

(Wee Contradiction)

Which is similar to the contradiction between the

Last Supper in the gospel of John and the Last Supper in the Synoptic Gospels

which are on two different days.

The Covenant with Many

CONFIRMATION OF THE COVENANT


Then Jesus tells Peter to have faith in God because the tree that was cursed is withered away.

This is utterly ridiculous!

(I CERTAINLY WILL NOT HAVE FAITH BECAUSE OF A FIG TREE !!!!!)

and THIS INANE TEACHING OF THE SYNOPTIC AUTHOR OF THE SYNOPTIC JESUS

has a great deal to do with

REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY!

NOT ONLY IS THIS RIDICULOUS

BUT AN INSULT TO

YOU!

Here is a site on the internet I found explaining the fig tree curse/miracle.  It is at Christian Courier.com, “a place for reasonable faith” and here is their explanation for what occurred,

but not really.

Why Did Jesus “Curse” the Fig Tree?

In this study he argues that the tree was probably not on someone’s property so therefore Jesus had the right to pronounce judgement upon a free fig tree. I guess that has been an objection to some, whether Jesus had the right to kill a tree.  hmmmmmm.  Then in number four of this study, he says that Jesus did not perceive that the tree only had leaves from afar even though Jesus is a deity and was expecting some fruit. His explanation for Jesus not being “on the ball” was that Jesus was not always in a deity-mode, sometimes Jesus was lazy and did not use his deity-ism. Because there was no fruit under the leaves that he did not see, he cursed the fig tree. By the way, this person is one of many that write and educate the masses justifying these non-events because they are not willing to discern and come to grips with the fact that some of the gospel is not true. They also hate Israel and this writer thinks God is done with Israel and he is so far off the track. They also have been trained since their birth to believe that the bible is INERRANT. Kind of like how they teach that the Pope is infallible. They have been trained not to question scripture, because they have been taught/brainwashed (as most of us have) and are just passing it on. It is deception and because someone tags the name of Jesus Christ to the insanity included in the bible and their own propaganda against Israel they will justify IT any witch way.


So, Jesus Christ used this curse of the fig tree as an object lesson for his disciples.

What in the world did they learn?

They learned that you can remove a mountain with your faith

somehow demonstrated through the cursing of a fig tree.

What about the mustard seed?

This is what is called “mocking a mountain out of a MOLE HILL.”

This is UNREASONABLE FAITH!

It is not in the Gospel of John, because it did not happen!

Jesus did not come to curse a fig tree!

===========================

Basically, the moral to this ridiculous non-event is to replace the fig tree

with the mustard tree

symbolically!

The deceiver came to curse, to ridicule, and to sow confusion, discord and deception.

IT IS A DUMB STORY!

========================================================

I believe this dichotomy has to do with Nathanael under the fig tree

and that Jesus called Nathanael “a true Israelite

in whom there is no guile.”

However, Luke’s rendition of Jesus Christ does!

Luke 23:29-31

29For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck.

s30Then shall they begin to say to the mountains, Fall on us; and to the hills, Cover us.

31For if they do these things in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry?

I DON’T KNOW……DO TELL!

Oh yea. Luke knows because he was there when they did it ……INDEED!

THEY PROBABLY ALL WILL JOIN WITH ROME TO FORM A UNIVERSAL RELIGION ….NOT TO OFFEND ANYONE….

AS LONG AS IT IS HEADED BY ROME!

THE MOTHER HEN

WHO WITH HER INFIL–TRAITORS MAKES MEN

COWAR

DDDDDDUUUUHHHHS

Besides isn’t cursing a tree ….a spell?  A trick. Cursing is Paul’s business! Paul does so in the books of the bible that promote him. In fact, it is Paul who catches men in their guile by being crafty:

 2 Corinthians 12:16
But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile.

Please view this you tube:

A New Pope


The Fruits of the Vatican

===============================================

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *


(If you like these articles there are many more at Homepage and New and Revised Articles)

June 2, 2010 Posted by | Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Great Deception, Jesus Christ, Peter, Synoptic Gospels, Tell no man, The Synoptic Gospels, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Judge Not, That You Be Not Judged


In my opinion so-called “Christians” are hurting their belief, by denying the truth.

The truth is there are many contradictions in the bible.

To say there are no contradictions in the bible is ridiculous!

You can’t explain away some of the contradictions with new meanings. It is no wonder so many people get turned off by the religions that profess Christian faith. I came across an atheists site about the contradictions in the bible and thought wow he has nailed some of the ones I have tried to nail. At least he has the boldness to say the obvious. But he is wrong about being an atheist.

What’s the difference?

The difference is there are reasons for the inconsistencies and the contradictions.

The reasons are that there was a concerted effort to include lies in the bible.

No doubt about it.

The conspiracy was to twist the truth and make lies and to try to make Jesus Christ bear it.

The problem is not Jesus Christ

….the problem is the church!

The whole point of having lies in the bible was to degrade the truth and why “Christians” defend lies is beyond me. Why not instead of finding excuses for the discrepancies,

tackle them with honesty.

The truth can stand and let the lies fall.

God can handle it!

It’s like when the Pope and all Popes consider themselves infallible. Come on. We all know they are very fallible! It’s their nature to fall as they all have so far. By denying there are problems in the bible is like saying the Pope is infallible.

If you take a different look at the bible (critically) and not blindly embrace everything,

because Peter says we should, is like the blind leading the blind.

2Peter 3:15-16

15And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;16As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.

The Stone Which the Builders Rejected-PART 1


Peter was only a man! Paul was only a man!

I highly doubt Peter knew what would be included and not included in the “scriptures.”  In fact, Peter (of the book of Acts) did not really know scripture very well as I will show because he misquoted it unless scripture (OT) has been “doctored” to make him seem like he misquoted.

Here is what Jesus told Peter on the third visit to his disciples at the Sea of Galilee:

John 21:18
Verily, verily, I say unto
thee, When thou wast young, thou girdest thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and anothershallgirdthee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not.

I think Jesus meant that Paul was the ‘another’!

John 21:21-23

21Peter seeing him saith to Jesus, Lord, and what shall this man do? 22Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee? follow thou me. 23Then went this saying abroad among the brethren, that that disciple should not die: yet Jesus said not unto him, He shall not die; but, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee?

follow thou me.

I don’t believe that Peter in  the verses of 2Peter 3:15-16

was the same Peter that was the disciple of the true Jesus Christ!

Just like the synoptic gospels used the name of Jesus Christ for ‘their  purpose,

I believe that they also used the name of Peter for ‘their purpose!

And their purpose was to deceive!

==================================

It’s crazy and does a disservice to God, His Son, to the truth,

to ignore the contradictions.

Since they are there maybe they should be analyzed!

Instead most people are afraid to question….which is stupid.

Most priests and pastors just hop over the contradictions,

because they are afraid

which is even more stupid.

===================================

What happens when God asks you, did you defend the truth about Me,

or did you defend the lies about Me?

Are you going to know what to say?

We hurt ourselves, prospective believers, the integrity of truth by denying these contradictions and/or making excuses for them.

It is a dishonest gain in the name of “Christianity”. and makes us liars!

I wish I could find a you-tube video I watched of a Muslim man asking legitimate questions of some Christian men about Jesus Christ. It was humorous in a way, because the Muslim man was very animated and excitedly interested.

Basically, the Christian man responded ‘because it is in the bible and the bible is inerrant.’

The meaning of inerrant is accurate and free from any error. 

What was sad about the video was that the Muslim man was sincere in his questions and the Christian man that gave his ‘pat’ answer

was so self-deceived,

and so he deceived a potential believer.

If I run across that you-tube I will re-edit this post and include it.  I hope I find it.

It was priceless!

No wonder people like Benny Hinn and all those others (I wont list any more because it is endless) we have seen over the years get so much attention. If we did not allow the lies and distortions leeway, people like Benny Hinn would not even try to be associated with Christianity. But we paved the road wide so anything can pass by not discerning the difference between truth and lies.

Billy Graham’s fatwa for his ministry is “By Any and All Means,” Yet Billy Graham doesn’t seem to have carried out his ministry very well, although successful by worldly measures because it is big and lots of money flows through his ministry. He is like the government and uses his made up lies to maintain his ministry. He has been outed many times for his allegiance and they are the ones that have helped him to grow by puffing his ministry via the press but not in the advancement of the truth but for what ever political junk that comes down the pike using religion to attract those contributions is what he uses to build his business, because that is what it is, a business.

Right now it is the devastation that occurred in Haiti, because of it’s location which seems to attract many devastating hurricanes. He is attracted to those kind of devastated areas because it is a great platform for him to plead for donations from those that are in a better spot. He plugs and highlights a few good areas and a few fortunate survivors to show his success.

I watched a show asking for money for some kids who were searching for food or treasure on a junk pile who could at any moment be hurt by the debris collapsing and eating rotten or poisonous food so said the commentator. And it occurred to me why in the world was I watching this if it was that dangerous why were the photographers filming it when they should have been helping and protecting the kids and keeping them from eating rotten food. But that was not the purpose of the film. The purpose of the film was to gain donations.That is poison. It’s sickening to me how these ministries use other peoples misfortune to build their own buisnesses and that is who Billy Graham is. They love devastation! Without devastation where would their business be? So that is why I believe if they can create devastation to build and maintain their ministry………….they will………. in the name of Jesus. If they have access to a weapon that can create devastation without being caught or blamed they will use it as I believe that they have already done deceiving themselves that it is the right way to make Christians of heathens or whatever they think is not christian. Of course they are out of touch with reality because it is not all right. It is down right evil. Not only that, deceiving themselves is a pretty good indication that they are not really on the right track in their own beliefs if they have resort to such measures. Obviously, they are only fulfilling their own personal desires for their own personal pleasures.

When Japan had their devastating tsunami was when the Roman Catholic Japanese were waivering on the acceptance of the Neocatechumenal Way. They had sort of a trial run on this way and the rate of suicide had risen quite a bit. The priests were apprehensive about the Neocats and the Pope was forcing this ministry upon them. I believe somehow this tsunami was created using HAARP or some other weapon that can create weather patterns using microwave heat to affect the atmosphere and ocean activity. President Obama was president then and I believe he knew it was going to occur because he and the Vatican work together (as Benghazi demonstrated) and sent Billy Graham and others to push their ministries upon these people. Not for their good, but for their own purposes and I’m sure it has to do with the industry in Japan competing with the Vatican controlled industries and power in that part of the world which is a project that the Vatican has openly stated and the same for Europe and the US and of course Africa and the Middle east. Basically the world.

I believe the same thing happened in New Jersey and New York with the hurricane Sandy for a political shadow to cover his mistakes using Susan Rice and others and being caught in their lies about Benghazi before the election they created a storm. Manhattan has the third largest jewish population in the world and I’m sure that helped locate a good place to cause destruction and since Israel and Washington, Benjamin Netanyahu and Obama, don’t see eye to eye, so to speak, it was Obama’s first choice, I’m sure.

They use Gore to blame these more than normal devastating ocean activities on global warming and make a business of it. The initial idea of global warming was birthed in the Vatican. Obviously they had the weapon first and found and excuse to to cover it’s use. It is perfect, because you cause devastation whenever it helps you to take attention away from bad politics and then blame it on some thing no one can control except them and all the while hiding the true cause. Everyone makes money that is involved but the people suffer and do it in the name of Jesus or God deceiving themselves that it is for the good of the people when they don’t even understand who God or Jesus is themselves because they teach nonsense about them so they must not know. Whoever influences this deception knows but the rest are like lemmings going along to get along and catching leftovers like the Democrats and some Republicans did with Hillary Clinton in the hearings.  The countless pork inside the bills is a good example. Sandy had it’s pork. That’s how they make their extra money on the side and build up businesses they are involved in.

Hannity of Fox News had a fantastic show about a month ago in December about the pork in many bills and I believe that some of those reoccurring pork avenues are leads to money being used to arm the enemies of Israel which are many and to weaken Israel whenever possible and to test Israel’s defense and resolve and to gauge their own standards of weaponry, etc.

Replacement theology.

Roman Catholicism hierarchy believe they are the chosen ones or they want to displace the chosen ones with themselves. They want to unite all the religions to wage war with God and the Jews. That is why I know that the christianity we know today is pretty screwed up. You can’t mix Voodoo and Christianity although they do in Haiti. You can’t mix Buddhism and Christianity. You can’t mix Hinduism and Christianity. Nor can you mix Islam with Christianity. Although the synoptic gospels did a pretty good job of it.

What would help Roman Catholics the most is if they would read their bibles on their own……discern truth from lies……don’t rely on priests to tell ya the truth because a good many of them really don’t know but what they were taught which evidently was a lot of lies if they think they can mix religions together.

Of course part of Roman Catholicism is VOODOO. Such as transubstantiation.

They can’t understand the meaning of bread so they make the bread into Jesus by VOODOOING IT.

Obviously you can’t make a wafer into God, LOL

You can’t make water holy by VOODOO either. LOL

You can’t mix the Gospel of John with the Synoptic Gospels. You can, however, compare them to the Gospel of John and gain a lot of understanding and go back and read the Old Testament and figure out who and which Jesus is the real McCoy.

Perfect case in point:

Matthew 7:1

Judge not, that ye be not judged.

John 7:24

Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

Me 1:1

Think not, that you be not thought

IT’S RIDICULOUS!

What Matthew’s quote in IT’s essence is saying, is don’t think.

It is totally meaningless!

(However it certainly works to gain a great deal of $$$$$ for most of Christianity today under the stewardship of Roman Catholicism and Evangelicalism etc.)

But it is not true!

While John’s quote is to say to have righteous judgement.

There is a big difference between the two!

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

I Am the True Vine


(If you like these articles there are many more at Homepage and New and Revised Articles)

May 31, 2010 Posted by | Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Great Deception, Jesus Christ, Peter, Romans, Sea of Galilee, Synoptic Gospels, Tell no man, The Book of Acts, The Synoptic Gospels, The Truth, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tell No Man


Jesus had just spoken to the multitude on the mountain where he delivered the Sermon on the Mount and came down the mountain and a man with leprosy asked to be clean and Jesus cleanses him and says the following:

Matthew 8:1-4

 1When he was come down from the mountain, great multitudes followed him.

 2And, behold, there came a leper and worshipped him, saying, Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean.

 3And Jesus put forth his hand, and touched him, saying, I will; be thou clean. And immediately his leprosy was cleansed.

 4And Jesus saith unto him, See thou tell no man; but go thy way, shew thyself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them.


What happened to the multitudes that at that time were following him as stated in Matthew 8:1 just two verses preceeding? Since we are reading about it in Matthew obviously someone knew!

Are priests not men?

Or is there “another reason” for this strange request?

 What are these strange requests about- to Tell No Man when obviously they did tell men and also purposefully recorded their strange “Tell No Man” statements  in the bible?

Again in Matthew Jesus tells his disciples to tell no man,

but this time 

that he was Jesus the Christ

Matthew 16:20

Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.

Could it be that he wasn’t the real Jesus the Christ,

but An imposter?

Matthew 17:9

And as they came down from the mountain, Jesus charged them, saying, Tell the vision to no man, until the Son of man be risen again from the dead.

Why?

This does not make sense!

By the way, these Tell No Man requests are not in the Gospel of John!

Mark 7:36

And he charged them that they should tell no man:

but the more he charged them, so much the more a great deal they published it;

Now come on,

if this is the Son of God don’t you think he would know that they would publish it?

This is an imposter—- a made up version of Jesus Christ!

The real Jesus Christ is the spirit of prophecy.

He would know that they would publish it!

Why the pretense?

This is a mock of the real Jesus Christ! A facade.

In other words, an image. A deceptive image!

Mark 8:30

And he charged them that they should tell no man of him.

Mark 9:9

And as they came down from the mountain, he charged them that they should tell no man what things they had seen, till the Son of man were risen from the dead.

Luke 5:14

And he charged him to tell no man: but go, and shew thyself to the priest, and offer for thy cleansing, according as Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them.

Luke 8:56

And her parents were astonished: but he charged them that they should tell no man what was done.

Luke 9:21-23

21And he straitly charged them, and commanded them to tell no man that thing; 22Saying, The Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be slain, and be raised the third day.23And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and and take his cross daily, and follow me.

Wait a minute, if you don’t tell them, how will they come?

This is nonsensical!


——————————————————————————————–

Note:

The Gospel of John

does not

include this same antithesis, Tell No Man!

Nor does Jesus of the Gospel of John tell his followers to deny themselves, etc.

A nomen indicates which gens a Roman belongs to. A gens is a loose collection of families sharing the same nomen. It is the middle part of the tria nomina, i.e., the three-part Roman name.

Here is a strange coincidence: 

Acts 23:16-22

16And when Paul’s sister’s son heard of their lying in wait, he went and entered into the castle, and told Paul.17Then Paul called one of the centurions unto him, and said, Bring this young man unto the chief captain: for he hath a certain thing to tell him.18So he took him, and brought him to the chief captain, and said, Paul the prisoner called me unto him, and prayed me to bring this young man unto thee, who hath something to say unto thee.19Then the chief captain took him by the hand, and went with him aside privately, and asked him, What is that thou hast to tell me?20And he said, The Jews have agreed to desire thee that thou wouldest bring down Paul to morrow into the council, as though they would enquire somewhat of him more perfectly.21But do not thou yield unto them: for there lie in wait for him of them more than forty men, which have bound themselves with an oath, that they will neither eat nor drink till they have killed him: and now are they ready, looking for a promise from thee.

22So the chief captain then let the young man depart,

and charged him,

See thou tell no man

that thou hast shewed these things to me.

Same Lingo:  charged them / tell no man

 as in the 3 Synoptic Gospels

(Matthew, Mark and Luke) but also in the book of Acts!

Now, who wrote the Synoptic gospels?

It is pretty obvious!

Sounds like the same person who wrote Acts 

wrote quite a bit of the Synoptic gospels

of Matthew, Mark and Luke!

Weird, huh!

The writer of  these Tell No Man phrases is mocking the Gospel of John when he said No Man in many verses. It is obvious that the authors of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke, the Book of Acts and so forth

(in their deep hate and their evil insanity)

had the Gospel of John

to degrade in every way they could!

Remember when Peter escaped from prison went to another place after James was killed and Herod died.  Then Saul turned into Paul after fulfilling their mission and both Paul and Barnabus took Mark? Per chance they meant the book of Mark and not the man or both. Maybe that was their mission. Because Mark would not work they added a few more gospels. Barnabus and Paul had problems so Barnabus took Mark to  Cyprus.

Why do you suppose the real Jesus Christ threw out the money changers in the temple,

if he did not want people to know about him?

Why would he raise Lazarus from the dead if he did not want people to know about him?

Why would he enter Jerusalem on a colt of an ass and have people laying down palms and believing in him

if he did not want us to know about him?

Why would he feed the multitudes if he did not want anyone to know about him?

Why would he have disciples if he did not want people to know about him?

Why would he heal people of their infirmities if he did not want people to know about him?

Why would he raise himself from the dead if he did not want people to know about him?

Why would Jesus come

if he did not want people to know about him?

John 12:19 ……..

“behold, the world is gone after him.”

Obviously, he wanted the people to know about him!

And I believe he came to confront an imposter…

the Thorn

so that we would be able to recognize who He is!

Why do the Synoptic Gospels seem so confused and confusing ……

Maybe the intention of the authors of those gospels is to confuse.

=====================================================

Please read:

Chief Priests and the Legion!

John 2:23-25

23Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did.24But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men,25And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.

John 3:31-33

31He that cometh from above is above all: he that is of the earth is earthly, and speaketh of the earth: he that cometh from heaven is above all.32And what he hath seen and heard, that he testifieth;

and no man receiveth his testimony.

33He that hath received his testimony hath set to his seal

that God is true.

==================================================

The true Messiah Jesus Christ wanted people to know about Him!

(Even before he was raised from the dead)

How would people believe

if he did not have witnesses?

John 11:41-42

41Then they took away the stone from the place where the dead was laid.

And Jesus lifted up his eyes, and said, Father, I thank thee that thou hast heard me.

42And I knew that thou hearest me always:

but because of the people which stand by I said it,

that they may believe that thou hast sent me.

He wanted them to know and to be witnesses. It was important to him.

Again, the Synoptic gospels of Matthew and Mark do not have this event of the

raising of Lazarus in their gospels.

Only the gospel of John!

However the Gospel of Luke does tell another story of Lazarus.

.Jesus Christ did not go around telling everyone to

 tell no man

He wanted us to know!

John 12:17-19

17The people therefore that was with him when he called Lazarus out of his grave, and raised him from the dead,

bare record.

18For this cause the people also met him, for that they heard that he had done this miracle.1

9The Pharisees therefore said among themselves, Perceive ye how ye prevail nothing?

behold, the world is gone after him.

Who is ye?

Prevail

1. To be greater in strength or influence; triumph: prevailed against the enemy.

As an abbreviation:

The ISO 3166-1 code for Yemen.

ye, the country code top-level domain for Yemen

Ye Meaning and Definition

  1. (adv.) Yea; yes.
  2. (n.) An eye.
  3. (pron.) The plural of the pronoun of the second person in the nominative case.

——————————————————————————————

Ye 1

Definition: Alt. of Ye

Definition: an old method of printing the article the (AS. /e), the “y” being usedin place of the Anglo-Saxon thorn It is sometimes incorrectly pronounced ye. SeeThe, and Thorn, n.,

I think that whoever the Pharisees were referring to (Ye) is the

THE THORN

in the above verse was so jealous of Jesus because he raised Lazarus from the dead and that the people believed in Him. Luke, Paul, and his friends ravaged the Gospel of John with the other gospels and Acts, and so forth. There are so many, many examples of the antithetical verses against the gospel of John and the truth about Jesus Christ.

Maybe that is why Paul says in the following verses:

1 Corinthians 16:21
The salutation of me Paul with mine own hand.

Galatians 6:11
Ye see how large a letter I have written unto you with mine own hand.

2 Thessalonians 3:17
The salutation of Paul with mine own hand, which is the token in every epistle: so I write.

Philemon 1:19
I Paul have written it with mine own hand, I will repay it: albeit I do not say to thee how thou owest unto me even thine own self besides.

Because Paul is lying to cover up the fact that Paul is also the writer of these antithetical scriptures against the Gospel of John and the truth and wants us to follow him instead of the true Jesus Christ as he attempts to do in his writings using the name of Jesus Christ for his own

BENEFIT!

Otherwise why would Paul say “in mine own hand“? He could just sign off as Paul but he adds “in mine own hand.”

————————————————————————————

John 4:22-24

22Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.23But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.24God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

DO NOT WORSHIP the Shroud of Turin, NOR the Pope, NOR any Institution, NOR the Bible, NOR the Torah, NOR the book of Catechism, NOR Mary, NOR the Temple, NOR any shrine, NOR any Bishop, or Priest, or apostle, NOR any book, man, religion or beast, NOR icon, NOR idol, NOR relic, NOR the Eucharist!

Why would Jesus Christ the true Messiah tell everyone he met to tell NO MAN?

It’s ridiculous!

He did not come to us to bewilder us or to hide who he was….

what would be the point?

He wanted us to know Him, perceive Him, hear Him, see Him, and to believe in Him. The TRUE Jesus Christ wanted us to know the Father through Him so that we might have life in His Name! He was not trying to hide like a criminal as the Synoptic gospels would have you believe. He didn’t come just so that the priests might know him. He did not come just so the upper class might have access to him. He did not come just for Kings and Queens or for a privileged few as in Luke 10:24 above would have you believe. He came for the world because:

John 3:16

16For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

The reason that Jesus Christ came to Israel and not to another country is because it is the God of Israel that is His Father!

The Father of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

John 8:57-59

 57Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?

 58Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

 59Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself,

and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.


————————————————————–

But the Synoptic Jesus said:

Matthew 8:4

And Jesus saith unto him, See thou tell no man; but go thy way, shew thyself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them.


$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Get the drift?

This is the ANOTHER Reason!

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Obviously, there are two different Jesus’s written about in the New Testament! 

The Synoptic Jesus and the Jesus in the Gospel of John.

 Since the Synoptic Gospel seems so dysfunctional, confusing and scattered in comparison to the Gospel of John, who should we believe?

Obviously, we should believe the Gospel of John which does not have Jesus going about telling the multitudes to tell no man about him knowing that they would tell about him.

In reference to this verse:

Matthew 8:4

 4And Jesus saith unto him, See thou tell no man; but go thy way, shew thyself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them.

Jesus of the Gospel of John came to cut out the middle man so that we would not have to shew  yourself to the priest or offer a gift that was commanded by Moses or pay an indulgence or cofess to a priest i a confession booth or say a bunch of hail marys with a bunch of beads and so that it would not be a testi-money unto them.

Soon after Jesus died the temple was destroyed,

that ought to tell you something, does it not?

If Jesus of the Gospel of Matthew were the real Jesus wouldn’t he know prophetically that the temple would be destroyed? Why would he want someone to give a gift that Moses commanded if the temple was about to be destroyed….but Jesus of the Gospel of Matthew didn’t know, and preferred the middle man because he was a tax man and made a living off people sinning and probably laundering money
and so he made a dumb error. An error that helps to distinguish the real from the imposter.
Whose line is it anyway?
  Matthew the tax collector a supposed apostle written about in the Synoptic Gospels,
but not in the Gospel of John.
Sound familiar?

The second term Correspondent dinner President Barack Obama said :

“In my first term, I sang Al Green;

in my second term, I’m going with Young Jeezy. 

In my first term, we ended the war in Iraq;

in my second term, I will win the war on Christmas.”

Will he?

Barack Obama in Israel: ‘the Beast’ limo breaks down

President Obama’s limo breaks down at Israeli airport

Today his limo broke down today in Israel. I wonder if that’s a sign?

Shalomnishambles: Barack Obama’s limo breaks down on Israel trip after petrol mix-up

20 Mar 2013 21:07

Off to a rough start, eh?

No Joke: Israel Digs Up Obama’s Gift Tree Hours After He Plants It .

Kind of fakey!

Of course, imposters are fakey.

President Obama visits Israel, nobody knows why

I’m sure he has something up his sleeve and in his little warped mind.

Tree given by Barack Obama to Israeli president not dug up – yet

According to the Times of Israel:

Ynet is reporting that by order of the Agriculture Ministry, the magnolia tree brought from the US by the president and planted by Obama and Peres earlier this afternoon is being dug up. Really.

Plants cannot be brought in from abroad “without undergoing a check” by the ministry, the report quotes the bureaucrats as saying. If this were April 1, we’d assume this was a wind-up.

Good idea!

Trust but verify,

however

I would verify and never trust Obama under any circumstances,

because he billed it!

Beware of strangers bearing gifts!

—————————————–

Something happens to people when they get involved with Barack Obama or Michelle Obama

as if they become possessed such as Beyonce. I’m not a fan (although she is talented and beautiful) and especially now with her new image. Lately, she looks as if she is possessed, and sings like it too which is too bad. She had better fight it (the possession) if she wants to remain human and in her right mind. Her lyrics to the song mentioned in this article are sickening and it has nothing to do with getting married as Rush Limbaugh suggests, which is utterly insane as I think Rush also has become possessed. What a remarkably stupid conclusion he came up with for her lyrics.

The change in her seems to coincide with her relationship with the Obamas.

They are evil.

Beyonce’s “Bow Down” as Quoted by the UK Telegraph

Another strange coincidence is Obama flew to Vegas to meet with Beyonce and Jay-Z to campaign for his reelection tight about the time these men were killed in Benghazi or shortly afterward. Was it the set of the movie Vegas or Las Vegas, Nevada? I don’t care if there is some deep meaning in the lyrics supposedly, I think they stink! It’s as if the killing of the men at Benghazi and his reelection and Bow Down are related somehow and I don’t think that is a good sign. Now he is in Israel and middle east spreading his wander lust with no guarantees, of course. IF you watch him talk about  peace in the middle east and the possibility of peace and then say but there are no guarantees it is like you can almost spot something deviant in his demeanor in the last part of that statement. Like his other self peeks out and takes control. Quite revealing as if he has a multiple personality disorder. I think he is a psychopath. Here is the statement but looking for the video of that particular statement which definitely demonstrates this disorder in my opinion if you watch closely:

“There is an opportunity there, there’s a window,” Obama told his audience. “Peace is possible. … I’m not saying it’s guaranteed. I can’t even say that it is more likely than not. But it is possible.”

Kerry yangs him afterwards and says the window is closing. LOL

Of course a lot of american tax dollars being used to grease many peoples agendas such as Jordan, Syria,Egypt and the Palestinians. 300 million American tax dollars going to Palestinians who do this to people or who laugh when the towers of New York were obliterated with people in them:

article-2235635-1621f8b1000005dc-779_634x404

Does that make sense?

Israel To Resume Money Transfers To Palestinians

Obama spending $300 million for ‘Palestinian state’

Obama To Exclude U.S. Companies From $300 Million Palestinian Project

Even though it is american money and the reason probably is because it isn’t really going for infrastructure it’s probably going to terrorism and an american company probably would find that out. This is insanity.

By the way I thought these arab countries had oil money why do they need ours.

Did Jordan contribute to the victims of the storm Sandy? Or the New Orleans hurricane victims? If Jordan can take in all of the Syrian refugees why not take in the Palestinians? But that isn’t their desire or purpose, is it?

Watch our for the queen of Jordan, Queen Rania of Jordan because Obama wants her and so does Michelle.

He buys his friends and his enemies:) In truth I think everyone is his enemy. He does not give a hoot about anyone but himself. (Notice his hand gestures look just like Bill Clintons hand gestures. OD!) I wonder if Billy Graham has the same kind of hand gestures. I kind of think he does. Obviously it is taught but it seems they are all in  cahoots.

Painful to watch because it is obvious he is a very sick individual.

It’s his fee, his charge.

Wherever he goes he does stir it up BECAUSE  he wants to escape the questions about Benghazi..

Bachmann Bungles Benghazi, Food Stamps

President Obama Begs Off Answering Whether Americans

in Benghazi Were Denied Requests for Help

Definitely does avoid answering.

Politico…Obama, Kerry negotiate their own peace efforts

Dreams From My Father Not

=============================================

The Weatherman and ‘Benghazi:

The Definitive Report’

Two states, three states, or four states in Israel

will not help, but will eviscerate Israel.

That is why Obama is in Israel. 

That is OBAMAS M.O.

Do Not ride with him in” the Beast’. Remember what happened to JFK. It was the limo that held him in place to be assassinated by JacQueline Kennedy. The injury that raised his arms and had only one entry wound came from the limousine that he rode in and was rigged to make her job easier.

———————————– 

Researchers tie Gulf War illness to brain damage

Fertile locusts swarm into Israel on Passover eve

(If you like these articles there are many more at Homepage and New and Revised Articles) 

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

May 31, 2010 Posted by | Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Jesus Christ, Romans, Tell no man, The Book of Acts, The Synoptic Gospels, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Salute No Man


Luke 9:1-3

Then he called his twelve disciples together, and gave them power and authority over all devils, and to cure diseases.2And he sent them to preach the kingdom of God, and to heal the sick.3And he said unto them, Take nothing for your journey, neither staves, nor scrip, neither bread, neither money; neither have two coats apiece.

Luke 10:3-5

Go your ways: behold, I send you forth as lambs among wolves.4Carry neither purse, nor scrip, nor shoes: and salute no man by the way.5And into whatsoever house ye enter, first say, Peace be to this house.

“Salute no man by the way”?  What does that mean?

I looked up “salute” in the bible online and there sure is a lot of Saluting goin’ on.

 Please click on this link:

SALUTE

So if they are supposed to salute no man by the way,

then why do they do so much saluting in this link?

This is absolute nonsense and deception by the way!

Does “no man” mean something else?

Who is no man?

SALUT NO MAN 2015-12-13 at 10.41.55 PM

A nomen indicates which gens a Roman belongs to. A gens is a loose collection of families sharing the same nomen. It is the middle part of the tria nomina, i.e., the three-part Roman name.

Real cute!

Funny, because in the Synoptic Gospel of Matthew, Jesus says:

Matthew 24:4
And Jesus answered and said unto them,

Take heed that no man deceive you.

Does he mean do not be deceived by any man or does he mean Let NO MAN deceive you,

or was it warning you that “no man” is deceiving you??????

That may sound crazy, but on the other hand we are talking about deception.

Luke 22:34-36

And he said, I tell thee, Peter, the cock shall not crow this day, before that thou shalt thrice deny that thou knowest me.35And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye any thing?And they said, Nothing.36Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

With what?

I thought they did not have a purse, scrip, and shoes above in verses Luke 9:1-3 at the top of this page and now they are supposed to have a purse. and take it and likewise their scrip, which they didn’t have but lacked nothing, and sell the only garment they have to buy a sword.

Is this nuts, or what?

Oh yea, and salute no man by the way! Weird!

——————————————-

Luke 19:11-28

11And as they heard these things, he added and spake a parable, because he was nigh to Jerusalem, and because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear.12He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return.13And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come.14But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We will not have this man to reign over us.15And it came to pass, that when he was returned, having received the kingdom, then he commanded these servants to be called unto him, to whom he had given the money, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading.16Then came the first, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained ten pounds.17And he said unto him, Well, thou good servant: because thou hast been faithful in a very little, have thou authority over ten cities.18And the second came, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained five pounds.19And he said likewise to him, Be thou also over five cities.20And another came, saying, Lord, behold, here is thy pound, which I have kept laid up in a napkin:21For I feared thee, because thou art an austere man: thou takest up that thou layedst not down, and reapest that thou didst not sow.22And he saith unto him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant.

Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow:23Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury?

24And he said unto them that stood by, Take from him the pound, and give it to him that hath ten pounds.25(And they said unto him, Lord, he hath ten pounds.)26For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him.27But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.28And when he had thus spoken, he went before, ascending up to Jerusalem.

Honestly, do you really think Jesus the Messiah would say verse 27:

27But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me

SOUNDS MORE LIKE A MURDERING BANKER!

After reading these verses and the parable

I would have been a very confused disciple!

=====================================

austere

1. stern or severe in attitude or manner an austere schoolmaster

2. grave, sober, or serious an austere expression

3. self-disciplined, abstemious, or ascetic an austere life

4. severely simple or plain an austere design

====================================

Austerity programs can be controversial, as they tend to have an adverse impact on the poorest segments of the population.[citation needed] In many situations, austerity programs are implemented by countries that were previously under dictatorial regimes, leading to criticism that the citizens are forced to repay the debts of their oppressors.[6][7][8]

So basically the Synoptic Jesus

is saying that he is an oppressor!

While on the subject of austerity here are some interesting articles from Rome of all places about Austerity cuts:

Analysis: More austerity may be the last thing Italy needs

best part of the article is the comment by:

Andrew150 wrote:

“So now living within your means is austere? This is just more spendthrift tripe.
If governments had been responsible in the first place and not given away more than they have taken in the economies around the world would be healthy and hearty. What were seeing is the result of irresponsible politicians on both sides of the aisle.”

One million protest against Italy’s austerity cuts

Italian workers strike against austerity cuts

As I recall it was those union workers that stood up for the Roman Catholic Entity last year in regards to the homosexual child abuse charges against the church

and it was the Mayor of Rome Gianni Alemanno who amassed and rallied support from those union workers in Rome to save that entity.

Short romance!

===========================================

Important Roman Statue Capitoline Venus Leaves Rome for Second Time Since 1797; Officially on View at the National Gallery of Art, Washington, June 8 to September 5, 2011

“Presentation of Sculpture is First Act of New Sister Cities Relationship; Mayor of Rome to Announce Dream of Rome Project….”

The Capitoline Venus

“The Capitoline Venus is a significant descendent of the first, revolutionary statue of this type, the renowned Aphrodite of Cnidos by Praxiteles. With the Cnidian Venus, Praxiteles introduced a new subject to the history of art: the large-scale, freestanding, fully nude female. This type of image became known in modern times as a “Modest Venus” (Venus pudica)

because the goddess attempts to cover her nakedness…..”

===========================

I just don’t envision in any way the true Jesus to be austere. To me He seems to be very patient and thoughtful, at least in the Gospel of John. He laid down his life for his friends and that does not sound like austerity. Nor did Jesus seem to be wishful to have his enemies slayed before him, at least not in the Gospel of John. IF he wanted to have them slayed before Him, then why didn’t he do that while he was being interrogated and beaten up. It wasn’t as if he didn’t have plenty of opportunities, but He did not do that. However, I do believe the imposter and the deceiver rendered in the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke would slay their enemies, and I believe they did slay them.

Here is an article about slaying with another meaning, please read:

Beware Oh brother, beware don’t you listen to the words. The tender lies….

Think about this statement of the Synoptic Jesus:

Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow

So now he is not only a murdering banker,

but also a thief!

Mark 14:49-53

49I was daily with you in the temple teaching, and ye took me not: but the scriptures must be fulfilled.50And they all forsook him, and fled.51And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:52And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.53And they led Jesus away to the high priest: and with him were assembled all the chief priests and the elders and the scribes.

Perhaps this young man took what Luke’s Jesus said in  Luke 9:1-3 and Luke 10: 3-5 above literally?

I really don’t think Jesus said the stuff that Luke said that he said, and nor do I think this young man followed him, etc. I think it is malicious nonsense!

IF anything can be made of these verses in Mark is that there was another that the young men followed (or laid hold of) and it is not the real Jesus!

There is something very strange about the mention of this linen cloth since it is not mentioned in any other gospel.


Why would this incident be added? IF this had happened it would be in the Gospel of John, but it isn’t. John was there! If you read the Gospel of John it is very detailed in comparison to the mish-mash of incidents, parables, healings and ramblings of the other synoptic gospels.(Matthew, Mark and Luke)

Seems to me that the linen cloth left behind may be pointing to the Shroud of Turin and these verses (Mark 14:51-52) must have been added quite a bit later on.

A cruel joke of some kind!

——————————

Something to consider very seriously:

Is the young naked man that fled and left the linen cloth the same man that is on the Shroud of Turin?

In Acts, there is a contention between Barnabus and Saul after their mystery ‘ministry’ when James (brother of John Zebedee) is murdered by Herod and Peter is imprisoned by the same and then Peter goes to “another place”  and then Herod mysteriously dies as told by Luke the writer of Acts and then Saul turns into Paul.

After these events Paul and Barnabus take John Mark with them.

I wonder if John Mark was Peter’s son? I wonder what the “another place” is referring to since the other two (possibly three) are murdered!

DID PETER SWITCH SIDES?

REMEMBER WHAT HAPPENED AT THE SEA OF GALILLEE WHEN JESUS VISITED THE DISCIPLES THE THIRD TIME AFTER HE HAD RISEN

AND WARNED PETER TO FOLLOW HIM.

JOHN 21:18-19

18Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdest thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands,

and another shall gird thee,

and carry thee whither thou wouldest not.

19This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God.

And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him,

Follow me.

BEFORE PETER SEEMS TO END UP IN ROME, JAMES AND HEROD ARE KILLED AND PETER GOES TO ANOTHER PLACE (which obviously is Rome). PETER TELLS THE LADY AT THE DOOR TO TELL JAMES

( I thought James was already dead – killed by Herod)

THAT HE WAS RELEASED BY AN ANGEL FROM THE PRISON, YET HE GIRDS HIMSELF

WHICH IS  OPPOSITE TO WHAT JESUS SAYS AT THE SEA OF GALILEE!

I FIND THAT INTERESTING!

THE BOOK OF ACTS WAS OBVIOUSLY WRITTEN AFTER THE GOSPEL OF JOHN AND AGAIN PURPOSEFULLY CONTRARY!

ACTS 12:7-9

7And, behold, the angel of the Lord came upon him, and a light shined in the prison: and he smote Peter on the side, and raised him up, saying, Arise up quickly. And his chains fell off from his hands.

smote past tense of smite (Verb)

1. Strike with a firm blow.
2. Defeat or conquer (a people [Peter] or land).

8And the angel said unto him, Gird thyself, and bind on thy sandals. And so he did. And he saith unto him, Cast thy garment about thee, and follow me.9And he went out, and followed him; and wist not that it was true which was done by the angel; but thought he saw a vision.

wist= knew / be aware of

So does the above mean that Peter lied or embellished his story of his escape from prison? Or was Peter deceived as I believe he was deceived when he fell into a trance and was offered unclean animals to kill and eat in the Book of Acts.

WHAT IS LUKE ALLUDING TO WHEN HE SAYS  PETER DEPARTED AND WENT INTO ANOTHER PLACE IN :

ACTS 12:17

17But he, beckoning unto them with the hand to hold their peace, declared unto them how the Lord had brought him out of the prison. And he said, Go shew these things unto James, and to the brethren. And he departed, and went into another place.

WAS THIS WHEN PETER WAS KILLED AND THE ABOVE STORY IS MERELY A COVER STORY?

OR DID HE TURN HIS ALLEGIANCE TO ANOTHER I.E. FOLLOWED ANOTHER!

Or is Luke lying about Peter and what Peter said about the angel telling him to GIRD THYSELF in opposition to what was written in the gospel of John at the Sea of Galilee?

Either way it is contrary to the Gospel of John….

Jesus also said (in the Gospel of John) that the PRINCE OF THIS WORLD WAS COMING AND HE HAS NOTHING IN ME.

JOHN 14:30

30Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.

WHO IS JESUS TALKING ABOUT?

I THINK HE IS TALKING ABOUT THE “THE ANOTHER” THAT WAS GOING TO GIRD PETER WHEN HE GETS OLD! Or rather the one that would write about it in opposition to the gospel of John. It is no accident that just about everything written in the Synoptic Gospels opposes and mocks the Gospel of John. So I gather that the authors of those gospels are or represent the prince of this world!

Acts 12:25

25And Barnabas and Saul returned from Jerusalem,

when they had fulfilled their ministry,

and took with them John, whose surname was Mark.

WONDER WHAT THAT MINISTRY WAS?

JAMES THE BROTHER OF JOHN ZEBEDEE IS MURDERED (SUPPOSEDLY BY HEROD), HEROD IS KILLED (SUPPOSEDLY BY WORMS) AND PETER GOES TO ANOTHER PLACE and they take John surnamed Mark (man, book or both?)

Could the deaths of these men be the ministry that is fulfilled by Barnabus and Saul?

=====

Then because John Mark does not “work” Paul doesn’t want to include John Mark in whatever it is he considered “work” in Acts 15:36-38. Very mysterious chronology of events!

Acts 15:36-38

36And some days after Paul said unto Barnabas, Let us go again and visit our brethren in every city where we have preached the word of the LORD, and see how they do.

37And Barnabas determined to take with them John, whose surname was Mark.

38But Paul thought not good to take him with them, who departed from them from Pamphylia, and went not with them to the work.

There is a “contention” between Paul and Barnabus. THEN Barnabus takes John Mark to Sicily. That is the last we hear about John Mark! However, we do hear about a person named Mark a verse later and I assume it is the same John surnamed Mark.

Acts 15:39

39And the contention was so sharp between them, that they departed asunder one from the other: and so Barnabas took Mark, and sailed unto Cyprus;

Who was John Mark? What happened to John Mark? He seems to disappear.

Some very strange things to consider in the Synoptic gospels that seem to cradle ACTS or visa-versa.

Zechariah 11:8

8Three shepherds also I cut off in one month;

and my soul lothed them, and their soul also abhorred me.

ARE THE THREE ABOVE THAT ARE KILLED JAMES, HEROD AGRIPPA, AND POSSIBLY PETER, MAYBE JOHN MARK WHO THIS VERSE IN ZECHARIAH 11:8 IS REFERRING TO? IT SEEMS THEY HAPPENED VERY CLOSE TOGETHER in time! AND IT COINCIDES WITH THE MINISTRY COMPLETED BY SAUL AND BARNABUS WHEN SAUL MOLTS INTO PAUL.

HERE IS AN INTERESTING ARTICLE ABOUT THE WRITER OF MATTHEW AND THE WRITER OF ZECHARIAH:


The Book of Zechariah

There are no dates given for chapters 9-14 and Zechariah’s name does not even appear in that section. Times have changed and there is no reference made to Darius or any other king. The temple is standing, instead of waiting to be built (cf. 9:8, 11:13-14, and 14:21). As a result, many scholars suggest that chapters 9-14 of Zechariah were not written by Zechariah at all.
There is very solid evidence to support this position.

Matthew 27:9-10:Then what was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet was fulfilled: “They took the thirty silver coins, the price set on him by the people of Israel, and they used them to buy the potter’s field, as the Lord commanded me.”

The problem comes in locating this prophesy, which, rather than appearing in the book of Jeremiah,

instead shows up in Zechariah 11:12-13.

Is this article suggesting that possibly Matthew or someone else wrote a part of the prophetic book of Zechariah! Or did he just misquote to mislead?

I think the author of the Gospel of Matthew did more than that!

Matthew 27:1-10

1When the morning was come, all the chief priests and elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put him to death:

2And when they had bound him, they led him away, and delivered him to Pontius Pilate the governor.

3Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders,

4Saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood. And they said, What is that to us? see thou to that.

5And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.

6And the chief priests took the silver pieces, and said, It is not lawful for to put them into the treasury, because it is the price of blood.

7And they took counsel, and bought with them the potter’s field, to bury strangers in.

8Wherefore that field was called, The field of blood, unto this day.

9Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value;

10And gave them for the potter’s field,

as the Lord appointed me.

Who is the Lord in this last verse?

The problem I have with these verses in Matthew is that many people believed in Jesus (of the Gospel of John) because Jesus had raised Lazarus from the grave (in the Gospel of John) and it was the chief priests who were plotting to kill Lazarus and Jesus because they were losing their preeminence and fear of the Romans taking their nation and so forth.

John 11:48-50

48If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and nation.

49And one of them, named Caiaphas, being the high priest that same year, said unto them, Ye know nothing at all,

50Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.

John 18:14

14Now Caiaphas was he, which gave counsel to the Jews, that it was expedient that one man should die for the people.

Then there is Joseph of Arimathea who was a a rich man from Arimathea, waiting for the kingdom of God, a secret disciple who craved the body of Jesus and who was a prominent member of the Council.

By body does this also mean the followers of Jesus?

Isaiah 53:9
And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the
rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth.

HMMMMMMMMM

Please read about DECEIT:

Prophecy of Esaias

Here is an interesting take on Joseph of Arimathea and Pilate:

Is Mark mocking Joseph of Arimathea, and Pilate?

What bewilders me is that Joseph of Arimathea is afraid of the Jews and is able to retrieve the body of Jesus from Pilate (a Roman).

Caiaphas and the chief priests are afraid that the Romans will take away their nation and all people would believe that Jesus is their Messiah if they allow Him to continue, so they plot to kill Him.

Another thing that bewilders me is that when Joseph of Arimathea goes to Pilate to take down the body of Jesus….why is Pilate surprised or shocked that Jesus was dead already? Supposedly IN THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS there was an earthquake, and darkness for three hours, and the veil of the temple was torn in two. Wouldn’t one of these events and even more, all of these events make a person aware or suspicious that something unique was happening? Unless PILATE was taking a very heavy nap! And Joseph of Arimethea wants to bury Jesus before the Passover feast and an earthquake has just occurred, the veil of the Temple is torn in half, and darkness over the land?  Wouldn’t Joseph of Arimethea have been aware of this,

IF WHAT IS WRITTEN IN THE GOSPELS OF MATTHEW, MARK AND LUKE WERE TRUE ?

Or was Joseph of Arimethea in a hurry to hide the body of Jesus in a tomb with a big stone and get on with the Passover?

(Often people that commit a crime like to bury their crime quickly and there happened to be a grave nearby owned by Joseph of Arimethea.)

Why would Pilate give the body of Jesus to Joseph of Arimethea?

Who is Joseph of Arimethea?

Is he that “other disciple” written about in the gospel of John that let Peter in to where Jesus was being interrogated?

Seems to me Pilate was being awful lax just giving the body of Jesus to Joseph of Arimethea and did not seem nor need to confer with all the other chief priests and the Counsel who seemed to be in his ear before.

Maybe Joseph of Arimathea was the top man and Pontius was his servant!

Here is an article about Joseph of Arimathea with a comment about the burial of Jesus.  The reason I add this article is not for the article itself, but for the comment by Anna Rosa M which I found to be thought provoking at the least. I included the article even though I think it is a bit contrived  so you can see where the comment came from. Beneath the link for the article is the comment that seems appropriate to add to my post:

Strange things are happening: Joseph of Arimathea

“Even stranger things…

For the record, the Jews have never, ever practiced any form of embalming. Don’t take my word for it, check Judaic Mishnaic Law from the first century for confirmation.

As such, what on earth where Joseph A. and Nicodemus doing at the tomb…after sundown…with 70 plus pounds of spices and oils?

To claim that the wrapping of Our Lord’s body in linens, spices and oils was “in accordance with Jewish custom” is absolutely wrong.

Either the author was completely unaware of Jewish custom…or the ritual being performed on Christ’s body was NOT Jewish in origin.”

By: Anna Rose M. on March 7, 2008
at 8:46 pm

=======================================

So why would a Jewish Councilman of the Sanhedrin, a “goodman and a just” as Luke describes Joseph of Arimathea, bury Jesus in an unJewish way,

or was Joseph of Arimathea not Jewish

BUT ROMAN

and was actually in charge of the whole business.

Usually you give the body to the family, but that is nowadays.  I have no idea what they did back then and being under occupation of the Romans.

Seems that the tomb of Arimethea was pre-calculated as the sight for the body of Jesus.

Furthermore, if Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemas had already prepared the body of Jesus, why would the women come to the tomb to do the very same thing. I thought it was already done by these two secret disciples.

It does not make sense!

Luke 23:50-51

50And, behold, there was a man named Joseph, a counsellor; and he was a good man, and a just:

“and a just”  a just what?

a just man? a just judge? a just counsellor?

A Just Prince?

I think there is something missing in that sentence!

51(The same had not consented to the counsel and deed of them;) he was of Arimathaea, a city of the Jews: who also himself waited for the kingdom of God.

—————

By the way, does God break his promises? If you read the prophecies in Zechariah, it seems that whoever wrote this part of Zechariah says that God does break His covenants:

Zechariah 11:10

10And I took my staff, even Beauty, and cut it asunder, that I might break my covenant which I had made with all the people.

What Covenant?

If Matthew wrote part of Zechariah…..Could it be that he is the prince that made the covenant that he breaks with all the people (the many)? The only covenant made in the gospel of Matthew and the Synoptic Gospels is at the “last supper” which is not written about in the gospel of John!

I don’t believe that God breaks His covenants that He makes,

but I do believe that a covenant was made by a deceiver, and it was broken, and this person thinks he is God.

He is the prince of this world, a liar, a murderer, and a thief!

IN essence what I mean is that the rendition of Jesus and the events described in the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke (the Synoptic Gospels) seem to describe Jesus as a thief, murdering banker, austere, unforgiving, eager to watch men slayed before him, avenging such as threatening the daughters of Jerusalem, a lunatic such as cursing a fig tree and comparing faith to a mustard seed, telling everyone he met not to tell about him as the multitudes were following him and sends them to the temple to give them alms…

Give me a break!

Also

Referring to the prophecy in Zechariah as the prophecy in Jeremiah which Matthew (or whoever wrote the gospel of Matthew) is deceptive and reminds me of what Peter said happened to Judas Iscariot in the Book of Acts, written by Luke (whoever he is) -who also refers to Jeremiah, and why Matthew should be the 12th apostle by drawing lots between two men, who I think were one and the same person…. which reminds me of Josephus and his stories. (Drawing Lots at Yodafat)

Talk about deception…..this is insanity!

So why should we not wrest with the scriptures

as Peter suggested?

I think it would be stupid not to wrest after reading the Synoptic Gospels, at least if you bother to compare them to the Gospel of John!!!!!!

2 Peter 3:16

As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.

====================================

Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST)


I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised

Josephus and His Footprints

Salute No Man

The Covenant with Many


(If you like these articles there are many more at Homepage and New and Revised Articles)

May 31, 2010 Posted by | Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Jesus Christ, The Book of Acts, The Synoptic Gospels, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

An Holy Kiss


Proverbs 27:6

Faithful are the wounds of a friend; but the kisses of an enemy are deceitful.

===============================

Matthew 26:48

Now he that betrayed him gave them a sign, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is he: hold him fast.

Matthew 26:49

And forthwith he came to Jesus, and said, Hail, master; and kissed him.

Mark 14:44

And he that betrayed him had given them a token, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is he; take him, and lead him away safely.

Mark 14:45

And as soon as he was come, he goeth straightway to him, and saith, Master, master; and kissed him.

Luke 22:47

And while he yet spake, behold a multitude, and he that was called Judas, one of the twelve, went before them, and drew near unto Jesus to kiss him.

Luke 22:48

But Jesus said unto him, Judas, betrayest thou the Son of man with a kiss?

In the Garden of Gethsemane when Jesus Christ was arrested

Judas does not kiss Jesus Christ in the gospel of John!

Romans 16:16

Salute one another with an holy kiss. The churches of Christ salute you.

1 Corinthians 16:20

All the brethren greet you. Greet ye one another with an holy kiss.

2 Corinthians 13:12

Greet one another with an holy kiss.

1 Thessalonians 5:26

Greet all the brethren with an holy kiss.

————————————————————————————–

1 Peter 5:14

Greet ye one another with a kiss of charity. Peace be with you all that are in Christ Jesus. Amen.

=====================

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised


(If you like these articles there are many more at Homepage and New and Revised Articles)

May 31, 2010 Posted by | Corinthians, Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Jesus Christ, Peter, Proverbs, Romans, The Book of Acts, The Garden of Gethsemane, The Synoptic Gospels, Thessalonians, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.