Blue Skies

Bible Prophecy (Truth & Deception)

Judge Not, That You Be Not Judged

In my opinion so-called “Christians” are hurting their belief, by denying the truth.

The truth is there are many contradictions in the bible.

To say there are no contradictions in the bible is ridiculous!

You can’t explain away some of the contradictions with new meanings. It is no wonder so many people get turned off by the religions that profess Christian faith. I came across an atheists site about the contradictions in the bible and thought wow he has nailed some of the ones I have tried to nail. At least he has the boldness to say the obvious. But he is wrong about being an atheist.

What’s the difference?

The difference is there are reasons for the inconsistencies and the contradictions.

The reasons are that there was a concerted effort to include lies in the bible.

No doubt about it.

The conspiracy was to twist the truth and make lies and to try to make Jesus Christ bear it.

The problem is not Jesus Christ

….the problem is the church!

The whole point of having lies in the bible was to degrade the truth and why “Christians” defend lies is beyond me. Why not instead of finding excuses for the discrepancies,

tackle them with honesty.

The truth can stand and let the lies fall.

God can handle it!

It’s like when the Pope and all Popes consider themselves infallible. Come on. We all know they are very fallible! It’s their nature to fall as they all have so far. By denying there are problems in the bible is like saying the Pope is infallible.

If you take a different look at the bible (critically) and not blindly embrace everything,

because Peter says we should, is like the blind leading the blind.

2Peter 3:15-16

15And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;16As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.

The Stone Which the Builders Rejected-PART 1

Peter was only a man! Paul was only a man!

I highly doubt Peter knew what would be included and not included in the “scriptures.”  In fact, Peter (of the book of Acts) did not really know scripture very well as I will show because he misquoted it unless scripture (OT) has been “doctored” to make him seem like he misquoted.

Here is what Jesus told Peter on the third visit to his disciples at the Sea of Galilee:

John 21:18
Verily, verily, I say unto
thee, When thou wast young, thou girdest thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and anothershallgirdthee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not.

I think Jesus meant that Paul was the ‘another’!

John 21:21-23

21Peter seeing him saith to Jesus, Lord, and what shall this man do? 22Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee? follow thou me. 23Then went this saying abroad among the brethren, that that disciple should not die: yet Jesus said not unto him, He shall not die; but, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee?

follow thou me.

I don’t believe that Peter in  the verses of 2Peter 3:15-16

was the same Peter that was the disciple of the true Jesus Christ!

Just like the synoptic gospels used the name of Jesus Christ for ‘their  purpose,

I believe that they also used the name of Peter for ‘their purpose!

And their purpose was to deceive!


It’s crazy and does a disservice to God, His Son, to the truth,

to ignore the contradictions.

Since they are there maybe they should be analyzed!

Instead most people are afraid to question….which is stupid.

Most priests and pastors just hop over the contradictions,

because they are afraid

which is even more stupid.


What happens when God asks you, did you defend the truth about Me,

or did you defend the lies about Me?

Are you going to know what to say?

We hurt ourselves, prospective believers, the integrity of truth by denying these contradictions and/or making excuses for them.

It is a dishonest gain in the name of “Christianity”. and makes us liars!

I wish I could find a you-tube video I watched of a Muslim man asking legitimate questions of some Christian men about Jesus Christ. It was humorous in a way, because the Muslim man was very animated and excitedly interested.

Basically, the Christian man responded ‘because it is in the bible and the bible is inerrant.’

The meaning of inerrant is accurate and free from any error. 

What was sad about the video was that the Muslim man was sincere in his questions and the Christian man that gave his ‘pat’ answer

was so self-deceived,

and so he deceived a potential believer.

If I run across that you-tube I will re-edit this post and include it.  I hope I find it.

It was priceless!

No wonder people like Benny Hinn and all those others (I wont list any more because it is endless) we have seen over the years get so much attention. If we did not allow the lies and distortions leeway, people like Benny Hinn would not even try to be associated with Christianity. But we paved the road wide so anything can pass by not discerning the difference between truth and lies.

Billy Graham’s fatwa for his ministry is “By Any and All Means,” Yet Billy Graham doesn’t seem to have carried out his ministry very well, although successful by worldly measures because it is big and lots of money flows through his ministry. He is like the government and uses his made up lies to maintain his ministry. He has been outed many times for his allegiance and they are the ones that have helped him to grow by puffing his ministry via the press but not in the advancement of the truth but for what ever political junk that comes down the pike using religion to attract those contributions is what he uses to build his business, because that is what it is, a business.

Right now it is the devastation that occurred in Haiti, because of it’s location which seems to attract many devastating hurricanes. He is attracted to those kind of devastated areas because it is a great platform for him to plead for donations from those that are in a better spot. He plugs and highlights a few good areas and a few fortunate survivors to show his success.

I watched a show asking for money for some kids who were searching for food or treasure on a junk pile who could at any moment be hurt by the debris collapsing and eating rotten or poisonous food so said the commentator. And it occurred to me why in the world was I watching this if it was that dangerous why were the photographers filming it when they should have been helping and protecting the kids and keeping them from eating rotten food. But that was not the purpose of the film. The purpose of the film was to gain donations.That is poison. It’s sickening to me how these ministries use other peoples misfortune to build their own buisnesses and that is who Billy Graham is. They love devastation! Without devastation where would their business be? So that is why I believe if they can create devastation to build and maintain their ministry………….they will………. in the name of Jesus. If they have access to a weapon that can create devastation without being caught or blamed they will use it as I believe that they have already done deceiving themselves that it is the right way to make Christians of heathens or whatever they think is not christian. Of course they are out of touch with reality because it is not all right. It is down right evil. Not only that, deceiving themselves is a pretty good indication that they are not really on the right track in their own beliefs if they have resort to such measures. Obviously, they are only fulfilling their own personal desires for their own personal pleasures.

When Japan had their devastating tsunami was when the Roman Catholic Japanese were waivering on the acceptance of the Neocatechumenal Way. They had sort of a trial run on this way and the rate of suicide had risen quite a bit. The priests were apprehensive about the Neocats and the Pope was forcing this ministry upon them. I believe somehow this tsunami was created using HAARP or some other weapon that can create weather patterns using microwave heat to affect the atmosphere and ocean activity. President Obama was president then and I believe he knew it was going to occur because he and the Vatican work together (as Benghazi demonstrated) and sent Billy Graham and others to push their ministries upon these people. Not for their good, but for their own purposes and I’m sure it has to do with the industry in Japan competing with the Vatican controlled industries and power in that part of the world which is a project that the Vatican has openly stated and the same for Europe and the US and of course Africa and the Middle east. Basically the world.

I believe the same thing happened in New Jersey and New York with the hurricane Sandy for a political shadow to cover his mistakes using Susan Rice and others and being caught in their lies about Benghazi before the election they created a storm. Manhattan has the third largest jewish population in the world and I’m sure that helped locate a good place to cause destruction and since Israel and Washington, Benjamin Netanyahu and Obama, don’t see eye to eye, so to speak, it was Obama’s first choice, I’m sure.

They use Gore to blame these more than normal devastating ocean activities on global warming and make a business of it. The initial idea of global warming was birthed in the Vatican. Obviously they had the weapon first and found and excuse to to cover it’s use. It is perfect, because you cause devastation whenever it helps you to take attention away from bad politics and then blame it on some thing no one can control except them and all the while hiding the true cause. Everyone makes money that is involved but the people suffer and do it in the name of Jesus or God deceiving themselves that it is for the good of the people when they don’t even understand who God or Jesus is themselves because they teach nonsense about them so they must not know. Whoever influences this deception knows but the rest are like lemmings going along to get along and catching leftovers like the Democrats and some Republicans did with Hillary Clinton in the hearings.  The countless pork inside the bills is a good example. Sandy had it’s pork. That’s how they make their extra money on the side and build up businesses they are involved in.

Hannity of Fox News had a fantastic show about a month ago in December about the pork in many bills and I believe that some of those reoccurring pork avenues are leads to money being used to arm the enemies of Israel which are many and to weaken Israel whenever possible and to test Israel’s defense and resolve and to gauge their own standards of weaponry, etc.

Replacement theology.

Roman Catholicism hierarchy believe they are the chosen ones or they want to displace the chosen ones with themselves. They want to unite all the religions to wage war with God and the Jews. That is why I know that the christianity we know today is pretty screwed up. You can’t mix Voodoo and Christianity although they do in Haiti. You can’t mix Buddhism and Christianity. You can’t mix Hinduism and Christianity. Nor can you mix Islam with Christianity. Although the synoptic gospels did a pretty good job of it.

What would help Roman Catholics the most is if they would read their bibles on their own……discern truth from lies……don’t rely on priests to tell ya the truth because a good many of them really don’t know but what they were taught which evidently was a lot of lies if they think they can mix religions together.

Of course part of Roman Catholicism is VOODOO. Such as transubstantiation.

They can’t understand the meaning of bread so they make the bread into Jesus by VOODOOING IT.

Obviously you can’t make a wafer into God, LOL

You can’t make water holy by VOODOO either. LOL

You can’t mix the Gospel of John with the Synoptic Gospels. You can, however, compare them to the Gospel of John and gain a lot of understanding and go back and read the Old Testament and figure out who and which Jesus is the real McCoy.

Perfect case in point:

Matthew 7:1

Judge not, that ye be not judged.

John 7:24

Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

Me 1:1

Think not, that you be not thought


What Matthew’s quote in IT’s essence is saying, is don’t think.

It is totally meaningless!

(However it certainly works to gain a great deal of $$$$$ for most of Christianity today under the stewardship of Roman Catholicism and Evangelicalism etc.)

But it is not true!

While John’s quote is to say to have righteous judgement.

There is a big difference between the two!

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

I AM THAT I AM (Part two)

I Am the True Vine

(If you like these articles there are many more at Homepage and New and Revised Articles)

May 31, 2010 Posted by | Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Great Deception, Jesus Christ, Peter, Romans, Sea of Galilee, Synoptic Gospels, Tell no man, The Book of Acts, The Synoptic Gospels, The Truth, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tell No Man

Jesus had just spoken to the multitude on the mountain where he delivered the Sermon on the Mount and came down the mountain and a man with leprosy asked to be clean and Jesus cleanses him and says the following:

Matthew 8:1-4

 1When he was come down from the mountain, great multitudes followed him.

 2And, behold, there came a leper and worshipped him, saying, Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean.

 3And Jesus put forth his hand, and touched him, saying, I will; be thou clean. And immediately his leprosy was cleansed.

 4And Jesus saith unto him, See thou tell no man; but go thy way, shew thyself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them.

What happened to the multitudes that at that time were following him as stated in Matthew 8:1 just two verses preceeding? Since we are reading about it in Matthew obviously someone knew!

Are priests not men?

Or is there “another reason” for this strange request?

 What are these strange requests about- to Tell No Man when obviously they did tell men and also purposefully recorded their strange “Tell No Man” statements  in the bible?

Again in Matthew Jesus tells his disciples to tell no man,

but this time 

that he was Jesus the Christ

Matthew 16:20

Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.

Could it be that he wasn’t the real Jesus the Christ,

but An imposter?

Matthew 17:9

And as they came down from the mountain, Jesus charged them, saying, Tell the vision to no man, until the Son of man be risen again from the dead.


This does not make sense!

By the way, these Tell No Man requests are not in the Gospel of John!

Mark 7:36

And he charged them that they should tell no man:

but the more he charged them, so much the more a great deal they published it;

Now come on,

if this is the Son of God don’t you think he would know that they would publish it?

This is an imposter—- a made up version of Jesus Christ!

The real Jesus Christ is the spirit of prophecy.

He would know that they would publish it!

Why the pretense?

This is a mock of the real Jesus Christ! A facade.

In other words, an image. A deceptive image!

Mark 8:30

And he charged them that they should tell no man of him.

Mark 9:9

And as they came down from the mountain, he charged them that they should tell no man what things they had seen, till the Son of man were risen from the dead.

Luke 5:14

And he charged him to tell no man: but go, and shew thyself to the priest, and offer for thy cleansing, according as Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them.

Luke 8:56

And her parents were astonished: but he charged them that they should tell no man what was done.

Luke 9:21-23

21And he straitly charged them, and commanded them to tell no man that thing; 22Saying, The Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be slain, and be raised the third day.23And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and and take his cross daily, and follow me.

Wait a minute, if you don’t tell them, how will they come?

This is nonsensical!



The Gospel of John

does not

include this same antithesis, Tell No Man!

Nor does Jesus of the Gospel of John tell his followers to deny themselves, etc.

A nomen indicates which gens a Roman belongs to. A gens is a loose collection of families sharing the same nomen. It is the middle part of the tria nomina, i.e., the three-part Roman name.

Here is a strange coincidence: 

Acts 23:16-22

16And when Paul’s sister’s son heard of their lying in wait, he went and entered into the castle, and told Paul.17Then Paul called one of the centurions unto him, and said, Bring this young man unto the chief captain: for he hath a certain thing to tell him.18So he took him, and brought him to the chief captain, and said, Paul the prisoner called me unto him, and prayed me to bring this young man unto thee, who hath something to say unto thee.19Then the chief captain took him by the hand, and went with him aside privately, and asked him, What is that thou hast to tell me?20And he said, The Jews have agreed to desire thee that thou wouldest bring down Paul to morrow into the council, as though they would enquire somewhat of him more perfectly.21But do not thou yield unto them: for there lie in wait for him of them more than forty men, which have bound themselves with an oath, that they will neither eat nor drink till they have killed him: and now are they ready, looking for a promise from thee.

22So the chief captain then let the young man depart,

and charged him,

See thou tell no man

that thou hast shewed these things to me.

Same Lingo:  charged them / tell no man

 as in the 3 Synoptic Gospels

(Matthew, Mark and Luke) but also in the book of Acts!

Now, who wrote the Synoptic gospels?

It is pretty obvious!

Sounds like the same person who wrote Acts 

wrote quite a bit of the Synoptic gospels

of Matthew, Mark and Luke!

Weird, huh!

The writer of  these Tell No Man phrases is mocking the Gospel of John when he said No Man in many verses. It is obvious that the authors of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke, the Book of Acts and so forth

(in their deep hate and their evil insanity)

had the Gospel of John

to degrade in every way they could!

Remember when Peter escaped from prison went to another place after James was killed and Herod died.  Then Saul turned into Paul after fulfilling their mission and both Paul and Barnabus took Mark? Per chance they meant the book of Mark and not the man or both. Maybe that was their mission. Because Mark would not work they added a few more gospels. Barnabus and Paul had problems so Barnabus took Mark to  Cyprus.

Why do you suppose the real Jesus Christ threw out the money changers in the temple,

if he did not want people to know about him?

Why would he raise Lazarus from the dead if he did not want people to know about him?

Why would he enter Jerusalem on a colt of an ass and have people laying down palms and believing in him

if he did not want us to know about him?

Why would he feed the multitudes if he did not want anyone to know about him?

Why would he have disciples if he did not want people to know about him?

Why would he heal people of their infirmities if he did not want people to know about him?

Why would he raise himself from the dead if he did not want people to know about him?

Why would Jesus come

if he did not want people to know about him?

John 12:19 ……..

“behold, the world is gone after him.”

Obviously, he wanted the people to know about him!

And I believe he came to confront an imposter…

the Thorn

so that we would be able to recognize who He is!

Why do the Synoptic Gospels seem so confused and confusing ……

Maybe the intention of the authors of those gospels is to confuse.


Please read:

Chief Priests and the Legion!

John 2:23-25

23Now when he was in Jerusalem at the passover, in the feast day, many believed in his name, when they saw the miracles which he did.24But Jesus did not commit himself unto them, because he knew all men,25And needed not that any should testify of man: for he knew what was in man.

John 3:31-33

31He that cometh from above is above all: he that is of the earth is earthly, and speaketh of the earth: he that cometh from heaven is above all.32And what he hath seen and heard, that he testifieth;

and no man receiveth his testimony.

33He that hath received his testimony hath set to his seal

that God is true.


The true Messiah Jesus Christ wanted people to know about Him!

(Even before he was raised from the dead)

How would people believe

if he did not have witnesses?

John 11:41-42

41Then they took away the stone from the place where the dead was laid.

And Jesus lifted up his eyes, and said, Father, I thank thee that thou hast heard me.

42And I knew that thou hearest me always:

but because of the people which stand by I said it,

that they may believe that thou hast sent me.

He wanted them to know and to be witnesses. It was important to him.

Again, the Synoptic gospels of Matthew and Mark do not have this event of the

raising of Lazarus in their gospels.

Only the gospel of John!

However the Gospel of Luke does tell another story of Lazarus.

.Jesus Christ did not go around telling everyone to

 tell no man

He wanted us to know!

John 12:17-19

17The people therefore that was with him when he called Lazarus out of his grave, and raised him from the dead,

bare record.

18For this cause the people also met him, for that they heard that he had done this miracle.1

9The Pharisees therefore said among themselves, Perceive ye how ye prevail nothing?

behold, the world is gone after him.

Who is ye?


1. To be greater in strength or influence; triumph: prevailed against the enemy.

As an abbreviation:

The ISO 3166-1 code for Yemen.

ye, the country code top-level domain for Yemen

Ye Meaning and Definition

  1. (adv.) Yea; yes.
  2. (n.) An eye.
  3. (pron.) The plural of the pronoun of the second person in the nominative case.


Ye 1

Definition: Alt. of Ye

Definition: an old method of printing the article the (AS. /e), the “y” being usedin place of the Anglo-Saxon thorn It is sometimes incorrectly pronounced ye. SeeThe, and Thorn, n.,

I think that whoever the Pharisees were referring to (Ye) is the


in the above verse was so jealous of Jesus because he raised Lazarus from the dead and that the people believed in Him. Luke, Paul, and his friends ravaged the Gospel of John with the other gospels and Acts, and so forth. There are so many, many examples of the antithetical verses against the gospel of John and the truth about Jesus Christ.

Maybe that is why Paul says in the following verses:

1 Corinthians 16:21
The salutation of me Paul with mine own hand.

Galatians 6:11
Ye see how large a letter I have written unto you with mine own hand.

2 Thessalonians 3:17
The salutation of Paul with mine own hand, which is the token in every epistle: so I write.

Philemon 1:19
I Paul have written it with mine own hand, I will repay it: albeit I do not say to thee how thou owest unto me even thine own self besides.

Because Paul is lying to cover up the fact that Paul is also the writer of these antithetical scriptures against the Gospel of John and the truth and wants us to follow him instead of the true Jesus Christ as he attempts to do in his writings using the name of Jesus Christ for his own


Otherwise why would Paul say “in mine own hand“? He could just sign off as Paul but he adds “in mine own hand.”


John 4:22-24

22Ye worship ye know not what: we know what we worship: for salvation is of the Jews.23But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him.24God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth.

DO NOT WORSHIP the Shroud of Turin, NOR the Pope, NOR any Institution, NOR the Bible, NOR the Torah, NOR the book of Catechism, NOR Mary, NOR the Temple, NOR any shrine, NOR any Bishop, or Priest, or apostle, NOR any book, man, religion or beast, NOR icon, NOR idol, NOR relic, NOR the Eucharist!

Why would Jesus Christ the true Messiah tell everyone he met to tell NO MAN?

It’s ridiculous!

He did not come to us to bewilder us or to hide who he was….

what would be the point?

He wanted us to know Him, perceive Him, hear Him, see Him, and to believe in Him. The TRUE Jesus Christ wanted us to know the Father through Him so that we might have life in His Name! He was not trying to hide like a criminal as the Synoptic gospels would have you believe. He didn’t come just so that the priests might know him. He did not come just so the upper class might have access to him. He did not come just for Kings and Queens or for a privileged few as in Luke 10:24 above would have you believe. He came for the world because:

John 3:16

16For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.

The reason that Jesus Christ came to Israel and not to another country is because it is the God of Israel that is His Father!

The Father of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.

John 8:57-59

 57Then said the Jews unto him, Thou art not yet fifty years old, and hast thou seen Abraham?

 58Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.

 59Then took they up stones to cast at him: but Jesus hid himself,

and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by.


But the Synoptic Jesus said:

Matthew 8:4

And Jesus saith unto him, See thou tell no man; but go thy way, shew thyself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them.


Get the drift?

This is the ANOTHER Reason!


Obviously, there are two different Jesus’s written about in the New Testament! 

The Synoptic Jesus and the Jesus in the Gospel of John.

 Since the Synoptic Gospel seems so dysfunctional, confusing and scattered in comparison to the Gospel of John, who should we believe?

Obviously, we should believe the Gospel of John which does not have Jesus going about telling the multitudes to tell no man about him knowing that they would tell about him.

In reference to this verse:

Matthew 8:4

 4And Jesus saith unto him, See thou tell no man; but go thy way, shew thyself to the priest, and offer the gift that Moses commanded, for a testimony unto them.

Jesus of the Gospel of John came to cut out the middle man so that we would not have to shew  yourself to the priest or offer a gift that was commanded by Moses or pay an indulgence or cofess to a priest i a confession booth or say a bunch of hail marys with a bunch of beads and so that it would not be a testi-money unto them.

Soon after Jesus died the temple was destroyed,

that ought to tell you something, does it not?

If Jesus of the Gospel of Matthew were the real Jesus wouldn’t he know prophetically that the temple would be destroyed? Why would he want someone to give a gift that Moses commanded if the temple was about to be destroyed….but Jesus of the Gospel of Matthew didn’t know, and preferred the middle man because he was a tax man and made a living off people sinning and probably laundering money
and so he made a dumb error. An error that helps to distinguish the real from the imposter.
Whose line is it anyway?
  Matthew the tax collector a supposed apostle written about in the Synoptic Gospels,
but not in the Gospel of John.
Sound familiar?

The second term Correspondent dinner President Barack Obama said :

“In my first term, I sang Al Green;

in my second term, I’m going with Young Jeezy. 

In my first term, we ended the war in Iraq;

in my second term, I will win the war on Christmas.”

Will he?

Barack Obama in Israel: ‘the Beast’ limo breaks down

President Obama’s limo breaks down at Israeli airport

Today his limo broke down today in Israel. I wonder if that’s a sign?

Shalomnishambles: Barack Obama’s limo breaks down on Israel trip after petrol mix-up

20 Mar 2013 21:07

Off to a rough start, eh?

No Joke: Israel Digs Up Obama’s Gift Tree Hours After He Plants It .

Kind of fakey!

Of course, imposters are fakey.

President Obama visits Israel, nobody knows why

I’m sure he has something up his sleeve and in his little warped mind.

Tree given by Barack Obama to Israeli president not dug up – yet

According to the Times of Israel:

Ynet is reporting that by order of the Agriculture Ministry, the magnolia tree brought from the US by the president and planted by Obama and Peres earlier this afternoon is being dug up. Really.

Plants cannot be brought in from abroad “without undergoing a check” by the ministry, the report quotes the bureaucrats as saying. If this were April 1, we’d assume this was a wind-up.

Good idea!

Trust but verify,


I would verify and never trust Obama under any circumstances,

because he billed it!

Beware of strangers bearing gifts!


Something happens to people when they get involved with Barack Obama or Michelle Obama

as if they become possessed such as Beyonce. I’m not a fan (although she is talented and beautiful) and especially now with her new image. Lately, she looks as if she is possessed, and sings like it too which is too bad. She had better fight it (the possession) if she wants to remain human and in her right mind. Her lyrics to the song mentioned in this article are sickening and it has nothing to do with getting married as Rush Limbaugh suggests, which is utterly insane as I think Rush also has become possessed. What a remarkably stupid conclusion he came up with for her lyrics.

The change in her seems to coincide with her relationship with the Obamas.

They are evil.

Beyonce’s “Bow Down” as Quoted by the UK Telegraph

Another strange coincidence is Obama flew to Vegas to meet with Beyonce and Jay-Z to campaign for his reelection tight about the time these men were killed in Benghazi or shortly afterward. Was it the set of the movie Vegas or Las Vegas, Nevada? I don’t care if there is some deep meaning in the lyrics supposedly, I think they stink! It’s as if the killing of the men at Benghazi and his reelection and Bow Down are related somehow and I don’t think that is a good sign. Now he is in Israel and middle east spreading his wander lust with no guarantees, of course. IF you watch him talk about  peace in the middle east and the possibility of peace and then say but there are no guarantees it is like you can almost spot something deviant in his demeanor in the last part of that statement. Like his other self peeks out and takes control. Quite revealing as if he has a multiple personality disorder. I think he is a psychopath. Here is the statement but looking for the video of that particular statement which definitely demonstrates this disorder in my opinion if you watch closely:

“There is an opportunity there, there’s a window,” Obama told his audience. “Peace is possible. … I’m not saying it’s guaranteed. I can’t even say that it is more likely than not. But it is possible.”

Kerry yangs him afterwards and says the window is closing. LOL

Of course a lot of american tax dollars being used to grease many peoples agendas such as Jordan, Syria,Egypt and the Palestinians. 300 million American tax dollars going to Palestinians who do this to people or who laugh when the towers of New York were obliterated with people in them:


Does that make sense?

Israel To Resume Money Transfers To Palestinians

Obama spending $300 million for ‘Palestinian state’

Obama To Exclude U.S. Companies From $300 Million Palestinian Project

Even though it is american money and the reason probably is because it isn’t really going for infrastructure it’s probably going to terrorism and an american company probably would find that out. This is insanity.

By the way I thought these arab countries had oil money why do they need ours.

Did Jordan contribute to the victims of the storm Sandy? Or the New Orleans hurricane victims? If Jordan can take in all of the Syrian refugees why not take in the Palestinians? But that isn’t their desire or purpose, is it?

Watch our for the queen of Jordan, Queen Rania of Jordan because Obama wants her and so does Michelle.

He buys his friends and his enemies:) In truth I think everyone is his enemy. He does not give a hoot about anyone but himself. (Notice his hand gestures look just like Bill Clintons hand gestures. OD!) I wonder if Billy Graham has the same kind of hand gestures. I kind of think he does. Obviously it is taught but it seems they are all in  cahoots.

Painful to watch because it is obvious he is a very sick individual.

It’s his fee, his charge.

Wherever he goes he does stir it up BECAUSE  he wants to escape the questions about Benghazi..

Bachmann Bungles Benghazi, Food Stamps

President Obama Begs Off Answering Whether Americans

in Benghazi Were Denied Requests for Help

Definitely does avoid answering.

Politico…Obama, Kerry negotiate their own peace efforts

Dreams From My Father Not


The Weatherman and ‘Benghazi:

The Definitive Report’

Two states, three states, or four states in Israel

will not help, but will eviscerate Israel.

That is why Obama is in Israel. 

That is OBAMAS M.O.

Do Not ride with him in” the Beast’. Remember what happened to JFK. It was the limo that held him in place to be assassinated by JacQueline Kennedy. The injury that raised his arms and had only one entry wound came from the limousine that he rode in and was rigged to make her job easier.


Researchers tie Gulf War illness to brain damage

Fertile locusts swarm into Israel on Passover eve

(If you like these articles there are many more at Homepage and New and Revised Articles) 

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *

May 31, 2010 Posted by | Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Jesus Christ, Romans, Tell no man, The Book of Acts, The Synoptic Gospels, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Salute No Man

Luke 9:1-3

Then he called his twelve disciples together, and gave them power and authority over all devils, and to cure diseases.2And he sent them to preach the kingdom of God, and to heal the sick.3And he said unto them, Take nothing for your journey, neither staves, nor scrip, neither bread, neither money; neither have two coats apiece.

Luke 10:3-5

Go your ways: behold, I send you forth as lambs among wolves.4Carry neither purse, nor scrip, nor shoes: and salute no man by the way.5And into whatsoever house ye enter, first say, Peace be to this house.

“Salute no man by the way”?  What does that mean?

I looked up “salute” in the bible online and there sure is a lot of Saluting goin’ on.

 Please click on this link:


So if they are supposed to salute no man by the way,

then why do they do so much saluting in this link?

This is absolute nonsense and deception by the way!

Does “no man” mean something else?

Who is no man?

SALUT NO MAN 2015-12-13 at 10.41.55 PM

A nomen indicates which gens a Roman belongs to. A gens is a loose collection of families sharing the same nomen. It is the middle part of the tria nomina, i.e., the three-part Roman name.

Real cute!

Funny, because in the Synoptic Gospel of Matthew, Jesus says:

Matthew 24:4
And Jesus answered and said unto them,

Take heed that no man deceive you.

Does he mean do not be deceived by any man or does he mean Let NO MAN deceive you,

or was it warning you that “no man” is deceiving you??????

That may sound crazy, but on the other hand we are talking about deception.

Luke 22:34-36

And he said, I tell thee, Peter, the cock shall not crow this day, before that thou shalt thrice deny that thou knowest me.35And he said unto them, When I sent you without purse, and scrip, and shoes, lacked ye any thing?And they said, Nothing.36Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.

With what?

I thought they did not have a purse, scrip, and shoes above in verses Luke 9:1-3 at the top of this page and now they are supposed to have a purse. and take it and likewise their scrip, which they didn’t have but lacked nothing, and sell the only garment they have to buy a sword.

Is this nuts, or what?

Oh yea, and salute no man by the way! Weird!


Luke 19:11-28

11And as they heard these things, he added and spake a parable, because he was nigh to Jerusalem, and because they thought that the kingdom of God should immediately appear.12He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return.13And he called his ten servants, and delivered them ten pounds, and said unto them, Occupy till I come.14But his citizens hated him, and sent a message after him, saying, We will not have this man to reign over us.15And it came to pass, that when he was returned, having received the kingdom, then he commanded these servants to be called unto him, to whom he had given the money, that he might know how much every man had gained by trading.16Then came the first, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained ten pounds.17And he said unto him, Well, thou good servant: because thou hast been faithful in a very little, have thou authority over ten cities.18And the second came, saying, Lord, thy pound hath gained five pounds.19And he said likewise to him, Be thou also over five cities.20And another came, saying, Lord, behold, here is thy pound, which I have kept laid up in a napkin:21For I feared thee, because thou art an austere man: thou takest up that thou layedst not down, and reapest that thou didst not sow.22And he saith unto him, Out of thine own mouth will I judge thee, thou wicked servant.

Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow:23Wherefore then gavest not thou my money into the bank, that at my coming I might have required mine own with usury?

24And he said unto them that stood by, Take from him the pound, and give it to him that hath ten pounds.25(And they said unto him, Lord, he hath ten pounds.)26For I say unto you, That unto every one which hath shall be given; and from him that hath not, even that he hath shall be taken away from him.27But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.28And when he had thus spoken, he went before, ascending up to Jerusalem.

Honestly, do you really think Jesus the Messiah would say verse 27:

27But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me


After reading these verses and the parable

I would have been a very confused disciple!



1. stern or severe in attitude or manner an austere schoolmaster

2. grave, sober, or serious an austere expression

3. self-disciplined, abstemious, or ascetic an austere life

4. severely simple or plain an austere design


Austerity programs can be controversial, as they tend to have an adverse impact on the poorest segments of the population.[citation needed] In many situations, austerity programs are implemented by countries that were previously under dictatorial regimes, leading to criticism that the citizens are forced to repay the debts of their oppressors.[6][7][8]

So basically the Synoptic Jesus

is saying that he is an oppressor!

While on the subject of austerity here are some interesting articles from Rome of all places about Austerity cuts:

Analysis: More austerity may be the last thing Italy needs

best part of the article is the comment by:

Andrew150 wrote:

“So now living within your means is austere? This is just more spendthrift tripe.
If governments had been responsible in the first place and not given away more than they have taken in the economies around the world would be healthy and hearty. What were seeing is the result of irresponsible politicians on both sides of the aisle.”

One million protest against Italy’s austerity cuts

Italian workers strike against austerity cuts

As I recall it was those union workers that stood up for the Roman Catholic Entity last year in regards to the homosexual child abuse charges against the church

and it was the Mayor of Rome Gianni Alemanno who amassed and rallied support from those union workers in Rome to save that entity.

Short romance!


Important Roman Statue Capitoline Venus Leaves Rome for Second Time Since 1797; Officially on View at the National Gallery of Art, Washington, June 8 to September 5, 2011

“Presentation of Sculpture is First Act of New Sister Cities Relationship; Mayor of Rome to Announce Dream of Rome Project….”

The Capitoline Venus

“The Capitoline Venus is a significant descendent of the first, revolutionary statue of this type, the renowned Aphrodite of Cnidos by Praxiteles. With the Cnidian Venus, Praxiteles introduced a new subject to the history of art: the large-scale, freestanding, fully nude female. This type of image became known in modern times as a “Modest Venus” (Venus pudica)

because the goddess attempts to cover her nakedness…..”


I just don’t envision in any way the true Jesus to be austere. To me He seems to be very patient and thoughtful, at least in the Gospel of John. He laid down his life for his friends and that does not sound like austerity. Nor did Jesus seem to be wishful to have his enemies slayed before him, at least not in the Gospel of John. IF he wanted to have them slayed before Him, then why didn’t he do that while he was being interrogated and beaten up. It wasn’t as if he didn’t have plenty of opportunities, but He did not do that. However, I do believe the imposter and the deceiver rendered in the gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke would slay their enemies, and I believe they did slay them.

Here is an article about slaying with another meaning, please read:

Beware Oh brother, beware don’t you listen to the words. The tender lies….

Think about this statement of the Synoptic Jesus:

Thou knewest that I was an austere man, taking up that I laid not down, and reaping that I did not sow

So now he is not only a murdering banker,

but also a thief!

Mark 14:49-53

49I was daily with you in the temple teaching, and ye took me not: but the scriptures must be fulfilled.50And they all forsook him, and fled.51And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him:52And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked.53And they led Jesus away to the high priest: and with him were assembled all the chief priests and the elders and the scribes.

Perhaps this young man took what Luke’s Jesus said in  Luke 9:1-3 and Luke 10: 3-5 above literally?

I really don’t think Jesus said the stuff that Luke said that he said, and nor do I think this young man followed him, etc. I think it is malicious nonsense!

IF anything can be made of these verses in Mark is that there was another that the young men followed (or laid hold of) and it is not the real Jesus!

There is something very strange about the mention of this linen cloth since it is not mentioned in any other gospel.

Why would this incident be added? IF this had happened it would be in the Gospel of John, but it isn’t. John was there! If you read the Gospel of John it is very detailed in comparison to the mish-mash of incidents, parables, healings and ramblings of the other synoptic gospels.(Matthew, Mark and Luke)

Seems to me that the linen cloth left behind may be pointing to the Shroud of Turin and these verses (Mark 14:51-52) must have been added quite a bit later on.

A cruel joke of some kind!


Something to consider very seriously:

Is the young naked man that fled and left the linen cloth the same man that is on the Shroud of Turin?

In Acts, there is a contention between Barnabus and Saul after their mystery ‘ministry’ when James (brother of John Zebedee) is murdered by Herod and Peter is imprisoned by the same and then Peter goes to “another place”  and then Herod mysteriously dies as told by Luke the writer of Acts and then Saul turns into Paul.

After these events Paul and Barnabus take John Mark with them.

I wonder if John Mark was Peter’s son? I wonder what the “another place” is referring to since the other two (possibly three) are murdered!




JOHN 21:18-19

18Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdest thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands,

and another shall gird thee,

and carry thee whither thou wouldest not.

19This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God.

And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him,

Follow me.


( I thought James was already dead – killed by Herod)





ACTS 12:7-9

7And, behold, the angel of the Lord came upon him, and a light shined in the prison: and he smote Peter on the side, and raised him up, saying, Arise up quickly. And his chains fell off from his hands.

smote past tense of smite (Verb)

1. Strike with a firm blow.
2. Defeat or conquer (a people [Peter] or land).

8And the angel said unto him, Gird thyself, and bind on thy sandals. And so he did. And he saith unto him, Cast thy garment about thee, and follow me.9And he went out, and followed him; and wist not that it was true which was done by the angel; but thought he saw a vision.

wist= knew / be aware of

So does the above mean that Peter lied or embellished his story of his escape from prison? Or was Peter deceived as I believe he was deceived when he fell into a trance and was offered unclean animals to kill and eat in the Book of Acts.


ACTS 12:17

17But he, beckoning unto them with the hand to hold their peace, declared unto them how the Lord had brought him out of the prison. And he said, Go shew these things unto James, and to the brethren. And he departed, and went into another place.



Or is Luke lying about Peter and what Peter said about the angel telling him to GIRD THYSELF in opposition to what was written in the gospel of John at the Sea of Galilee?

Either way it is contrary to the Gospel of John….

Jesus also said (in the Gospel of John) that the PRINCE OF THIS WORLD WAS COMING AND HE HAS NOTHING IN ME.

JOHN 14:30

30Hereafter I will not talk much with you: for the prince of this world cometh, and hath nothing in me.


I THINK HE IS TALKING ABOUT THE “THE ANOTHER” THAT WAS GOING TO GIRD PETER WHEN HE GETS OLD! Or rather the one that would write about it in opposition to the gospel of John. It is no accident that just about everything written in the Synoptic Gospels opposes and mocks the Gospel of John. So I gather that the authors of those gospels are or represent the prince of this world!

Acts 12:25

25And Barnabas and Saul returned from Jerusalem,

when they had fulfilled their ministry,

and took with them John, whose surname was Mark.



Could the deaths of these men be the ministry that is fulfilled by Barnabus and Saul?


Then because John Mark does not “work” Paul doesn’t want to include John Mark in whatever it is he considered “work” in Acts 15:36-38. Very mysterious chronology of events!

Acts 15:36-38

36And some days after Paul said unto Barnabas, Let us go again and visit our brethren in every city where we have preached the word of the LORD, and see how they do.

37And Barnabas determined to take with them John, whose surname was Mark.

38But Paul thought not good to take him with them, who departed from them from Pamphylia, and went not with them to the work.

There is a “contention” between Paul and Barnabus. THEN Barnabus takes John Mark to Sicily. That is the last we hear about John Mark! However, we do hear about a person named Mark a verse later and I assume it is the same John surnamed Mark.

Acts 15:39

39And the contention was so sharp between them, that they departed asunder one from the other: and so Barnabas took Mark, and sailed unto Cyprus;

Who was John Mark? What happened to John Mark? He seems to disappear.

Some very strange things to consider in the Synoptic gospels that seem to cradle ACTS or visa-versa.

Zechariah 11:8

8Three shepherds also I cut off in one month;

and my soul lothed them, and their soul also abhorred me.



The Book of Zechariah

There are no dates given for chapters 9-14 and Zechariah’s name does not even appear in that section. Times have changed and there is no reference made to Darius or any other king. The temple is standing, instead of waiting to be built (cf. 9:8, 11:13-14, and 14:21). As a result, many scholars suggest that chapters 9-14 of Zechariah were not written by Zechariah at all.
There is very solid evidence to support this position.

Matthew 27:9-10:Then what was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet was fulfilled: “They took the thirty silver coins, the price set on him by the people of Israel, and they used them to buy the potter’s field, as the Lord commanded me.”

The problem comes in locating this prophesy, which, rather than appearing in the book of Jeremiah,

instead shows up in Zechariah 11:12-13.

Is this article suggesting that possibly Matthew or someone else wrote a part of the prophetic book of Zechariah! Or did he just misquote to mislead?

I think the author of the Gospel of Matthew did more than that!

Matthew 27:1-10

1When the morning was come, all the chief priests and elders of the people took counsel against Jesus to put him to death:

2And when they had bound him, they led him away, and delivered him to Pontius Pilate the governor.

3Then Judas, which had betrayed him, when he saw that he was condemned, repented himself, and brought again the thirty pieces of silver to the chief priests and elders,

4Saying, I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood. And they said, What is that to us? see thou to that.

5And he cast down the pieces of silver in the temple, and departed, and went and hanged himself.

6And the chief priests took the silver pieces, and said, It is not lawful for to put them into the treasury, because it is the price of blood.

7And they took counsel, and bought with them the potter’s field, to bury strangers in.

8Wherefore that field was called, The field of blood, unto this day.

9Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, And they took the thirty pieces of silver, the price of him that was valued, whom they of the children of Israel did value;

10And gave them for the potter’s field,

as the Lord appointed me.

Who is the Lord in this last verse?

The problem I have with these verses in Matthew is that many people believed in Jesus (of the Gospel of John) because Jesus had raised Lazarus from the grave (in the Gospel of John) and it was the chief priests who were plotting to kill Lazarus and Jesus because they were losing their preeminence and fear of the Romans taking their nation and so forth.

John 11:48-50

48If we let him thus alone, all men will believe on him: and the Romans shall come and take away both our place and nation.

49And one of them, named Caiaphas, being the high priest that same year, said unto them, Ye know nothing at all,

50Nor consider that it is expedient for us, that one man should die for the people, and that the whole nation perish not.

John 18:14

14Now Caiaphas was he, which gave counsel to the Jews, that it was expedient that one man should die for the people.

Then there is Joseph of Arimathea who was a a rich man from Arimathea, waiting for the kingdom of God, a secret disciple who craved the body of Jesus and who was a prominent member of the Council.

By body does this also mean the followers of Jesus?

Isaiah 53:9
And he made his grave with the wicked, and with the
rich in his death; because he had done no violence, neither was any deceit in his mouth.


Please read about DECEIT:

Prophecy of Esaias

Here is an interesting take on Joseph of Arimathea and Pilate:

Is Mark mocking Joseph of Arimathea, and Pilate?

What bewilders me is that Joseph of Arimathea is afraid of the Jews and is able to retrieve the body of Jesus from Pilate (a Roman).

Caiaphas and the chief priests are afraid that the Romans will take away their nation and all people would believe that Jesus is their Messiah if they allow Him to continue, so they plot to kill Him.

Another thing that bewilders me is that when Joseph of Arimathea goes to Pilate to take down the body of Jesus….why is Pilate surprised or shocked that Jesus was dead already? Supposedly IN THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS there was an earthquake, and darkness for three hours, and the veil of the temple was torn in two. Wouldn’t one of these events and even more, all of these events make a person aware or suspicious that something unique was happening? Unless PILATE was taking a very heavy nap! And Joseph of Arimethea wants to bury Jesus before the Passover feast and an earthquake has just occurred, the veil of the Temple is torn in half, and darkness over the land?  Wouldn’t Joseph of Arimethea have been aware of this,


Or was Joseph of Arimethea in a hurry to hide the body of Jesus in a tomb with a big stone and get on with the Passover?

(Often people that commit a crime like to bury their crime quickly and there happened to be a grave nearby owned by Joseph of Arimethea.)

Why would Pilate give the body of Jesus to Joseph of Arimethea?

Who is Joseph of Arimethea?

Is he that “other disciple” written about in the gospel of John that let Peter in to where Jesus was being interrogated?

Seems to me Pilate was being awful lax just giving the body of Jesus to Joseph of Arimethea and did not seem nor need to confer with all the other chief priests and the Counsel who seemed to be in his ear before.

Maybe Joseph of Arimathea was the top man and Pontius was his servant!

Here is an article about Joseph of Arimathea with a comment about the burial of Jesus.  The reason I add this article is not for the article itself, but for the comment by Anna Rosa M which I found to be thought provoking at the least. I included the article even though I think it is a bit contrived  so you can see where the comment came from. Beneath the link for the article is the comment that seems appropriate to add to my post:

Strange things are happening: Joseph of Arimathea

“Even stranger things…

For the record, the Jews have never, ever practiced any form of embalming. Don’t take my word for it, check Judaic Mishnaic Law from the first century for confirmation.

As such, what on earth where Joseph A. and Nicodemus doing at the tomb…after sundown…with 70 plus pounds of spices and oils?

To claim that the wrapping of Our Lord’s body in linens, spices and oils was “in accordance with Jewish custom” is absolutely wrong.

Either the author was completely unaware of Jewish custom…or the ritual being performed on Christ’s body was NOT Jewish in origin.”

By: Anna Rose M. on March 7, 2008
at 8:46 pm


So why would a Jewish Councilman of the Sanhedrin, a “goodman and a just” as Luke describes Joseph of Arimathea, bury Jesus in an unJewish way,

or was Joseph of Arimathea not Jewish


and was actually in charge of the whole business.

Usually you give the body to the family, but that is nowadays.  I have no idea what they did back then and being under occupation of the Romans.

Seems that the tomb of Arimethea was pre-calculated as the sight for the body of Jesus.

Furthermore, if Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemas had already prepared the body of Jesus, why would the women come to the tomb to do the very same thing. I thought it was already done by these two secret disciples.

It does not make sense!

Luke 23:50-51

50And, behold, there was a man named Joseph, a counsellor; and he was a good man, and a just:

“and a just”  a just what?

a just man? a just judge? a just counsellor?

A Just Prince?

I think there is something missing in that sentence!

51(The same had not consented to the counsel and deed of them;) he was of Arimathaea, a city of the Jews: who also himself waited for the kingdom of God.


By the way, does God break his promises? If you read the prophecies in Zechariah, it seems that whoever wrote this part of Zechariah says that God does break His covenants:

Zechariah 11:10

10And I took my staff, even Beauty, and cut it asunder, that I might break my covenant which I had made with all the people.

What Covenant?

If Matthew wrote part of Zechariah…..Could it be that he is the prince that made the covenant that he breaks with all the people (the many)? The only covenant made in the gospel of Matthew and the Synoptic Gospels is at the “last supper” which is not written about in the gospel of John!

I don’t believe that God breaks His covenants that He makes,

but I do believe that a covenant was made by a deceiver, and it was broken, and this person thinks he is God.

He is the prince of this world, a liar, a murderer, and a thief!

IN essence what I mean is that the rendition of Jesus and the events described in the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke (the Synoptic Gospels) seem to describe Jesus as a thief, murdering banker, austere, unforgiving, eager to watch men slayed before him, avenging such as threatening the daughters of Jerusalem, a lunatic such as cursing a fig tree and comparing faith to a mustard seed, telling everyone he met not to tell about him as the multitudes were following him and sends them to the temple to give them alms…

Give me a break!


Referring to the prophecy in Zechariah as the prophecy in Jeremiah which Matthew (or whoever wrote the gospel of Matthew) is deceptive and reminds me of what Peter said happened to Judas Iscariot in the Book of Acts, written by Luke (whoever he is) -who also refers to Jeremiah, and why Matthew should be the 12th apostle by drawing lots between two men, who I think were one and the same person…. which reminds me of Josephus and his stories. (Drawing Lots at Yodafat)

Talk about deception…..this is insanity!

So why should we not wrest with the scriptures

as Peter suggested?

I think it would be stupid not to wrest after reading the Synoptic Gospels, at least if you bother to compare them to the Gospel of John!!!!!!

2 Peter 3:16

As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.


Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST)

I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised

Josephus and His Footprints

Salute No Man

The Covenant with Many

(If you like these articles there are many more at Homepage and New and Revised Articles)

May 31, 2010 Posted by | Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Jesus Christ, The Book of Acts, The Synoptic Gospels, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

An Holy Kiss

Proverbs 27:6

Faithful are the wounds of a friend; but the kisses of an enemy are deceitful.


Matthew 26:48

Now he that betrayed him gave them a sign, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is he: hold him fast.

Matthew 26:49

And forthwith he came to Jesus, and said, Hail, master; and kissed him.

Mark 14:44

And he that betrayed him had given them a token, saying, Whomsoever I shall kiss, that same is he; take him, and lead him away safely.

Mark 14:45

And as soon as he was come, he goeth straightway to him, and saith, Master, master; and kissed him.

Luke 22:47

And while he yet spake, behold a multitude, and he that was called Judas, one of the twelve, went before them, and drew near unto Jesus to kiss him.

Luke 22:48

But Jesus said unto him, Judas, betrayest thou the Son of man with a kiss?

In the Garden of Gethsemane when Jesus Christ was arrested

Judas does not kiss Jesus Christ in the gospel of John!

Romans 16:16

Salute one another with an holy kiss. The churches of Christ salute you.

1 Corinthians 16:20

All the brethren greet you. Greet ye one another with an holy kiss.

2 Corinthians 13:12

Greet one another with an holy kiss.

1 Thessalonians 5:26

Greet all the brethren with an holy kiss.


1 Peter 5:14

Greet ye one another with a kiss of charity. Peace be with you all that are in Christ Jesus. Amen.


I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised

(If you like these articles there are many more at Homepage and New and Revised Articles)

May 31, 2010 Posted by | Corinthians, Gospel of John, Gospel of Luke, Gospel of Mark, Gospel of Matthew, Jesus Christ, Peter, Proverbs, Romans, The Book of Acts, The Garden of Gethsemane, The Synoptic Gospels, Thessalonians, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment