Speaking with his tongue which he does quite often.
For instance Franklin Graham representing BGEA:
5. Graham didn’t direct the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association to remove its website’s reference to Mormonism as a cult shortly before Election Day. But he agrees with the move. “I didn’t even know it was there. We have like 10,000 pages on our website,” Graham told us.
Graham said the reference isn’t coming back to the site. “I don’t want to be involved in calling people names,” he told us. “I want to reach people for Christ, and how can I do that if I’m calling them a name? I don’t even like the word cult; it sounds like dungeons and dragons or something.”
Give me a break….he didn’t even know it was there?
This guy is full of deceipt.
It’s okay to change your mind. It was a self-serving gesture for your ministry and an alliance to benefit you, and nothing more.
Talk about disingenuous!
“……The presentation of a false choice often reflects a deliberate attempt to eliminate the middle ground on an issue. Eldridge Cleaver used such a quotation during his 1968 presidential campaign: “You’re either part of the solution or part of the problem.” Another example would be the former US president George W. Bush stating that the world had a choice to make; “Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.”……”
49And John answered and said, Master, we saw one casting out devils in thy name; and we forbad him,
because he followeth not with us.
50And Jesus said unto him, Forbid him not: for he that is not against us is for us.
How about Benny Hinn?
Here is a you-tube of an example of Grace in the form of Benny Hinn a product of Billy Graham’s Evangelicals and Roman Catholicism
which I tried to transcribe a portion:
“Look at me. You’ve been oppressed by a devil. You’ve had demons literally try to kill you. You’ve had the devil himself try to kill you. I see when you were a child about three years of age. Someone put a curse on you. You remember that? “
(Woman shakes her head saying no.)
“You don’t because you were three years old.”
How does he know?
(Then Benny Hinn says something hard to translate and then says:)
“…….you are free in the name of Jesus From the top of her head to the soles of her feet she’s free.”
(Then Benny Hinn yells and pushes her: )
“She is free in Jesus name.”
(Then the crowd erupts in applause and he raises his hands in the air and says something I cannot translate:)
This is junk! Oh, it may be real, but it is still junk!
“4. Roman executions typically were considered a form of public spectacle. “
In the gospels and the following books the person who curses a person is Paul! And the other time a curse is mentioned by Peter in regards to Jesus becoming a curse and implicit in that assumption is Judas, the slaves that were hung in the south, and anyone who hangs on a tree which could have another meaning….such as.Christmas Tree Decorations/ decorators.
1 Corinthians 16:22
If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maranatha.
In Roman Catholicism the only person allowed to curse an anathema marantha is the Pope and his Bishops.
Which of course you have to wonder: Was Saul/Paul a pope?
He sure traveled far and wide as do popes in our time.
Anyone who curses a three year old is sick.
What Bennie Hinn offers this woman is a false dilemma. A False Jesus. One that kills, maims, curses, possesses,
and ultimately destroys.
The devil posing as a healer.
What he offers her is Paul. Ba’al!
This is the way of Deception. However, Thank God we do have someone that loves us written about in the Gospel of John. And He is aware of what occurs in these arenas!
Here is a link with information From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia about Benny Hinn:
“Toufik Benedictus ”Benny” Hinn”
Soon after the 1967 Arab-Israeli War (a.k.a. “The Six-Day War)”, Hinn’s family emigrated to Toronto, Ontario, Canada, where he attended but later prematurely left the Georges Vanier Secondary School. In his books, Hinn states that his father was the mayor of Jaffa at the time of his birth, and that as a child, he was socially isolated and was handicapped by a severe stutter, but was nonetheless a first-class student. These claims, however, have been disputed by critics of Hinn. As a teenager in Toronto, Hinn converted from Greek Orthodoxy to Pentecostalism, eventually joining a singing troupe made up of young evangelicals. According to a 2004 CBC report on Hinn, his newfound religious devotion during this period became so intense that his family became concerned that he was turning into a religious fanatic. Hinn was taught the bible and mentored by Dr. Winston I. Nunes of Broadview Faith Temple in Toronto.“
Again speaking with his tongue
The Devil is tricky: Very interesting parable and very quaint except that the problem with it is the false dilemma such as what occurred recently in Japan. Please read:
Benny Hinn was raised Eastern Orthodox tradition which is another form of Catholicism, one of many. Then he became Pentacostal which is still another form of Catholicism, one of many!
They created it as another false choice!
Where do you think “All Roads Lead to Rome” originated?
Same choice offered for the “little ant parable of Billy Graham.”
They create a dilemma, and they offer solutions to makes you think you have overcome!
They interfere so that they may intervene! In legal terms it would be called “Entrapment.”
“In criminal law, entrapment is conduct by a law enforcement agent inducing a person to commit an offense that the person would otherwise have been unlikely to commit.”
In moral law it might be perhaps causing unwanted pregnancies by introducing drugs, propaganda and making abortion legal. Or causing joblessness through hate or prejudice causing a person to steal for food, deal drugs, prostitution etc.
While our troops fought in Vietnam drug use among youth definitely increased. Itis not by accident!
You are not given a fair choice!!!!!!
Like the nurses you hear about that create near death experiences in order to save you when in fact they are the enemy obviously. It gives them a false sense of power over others. Makes them think they are Gods angels or God himself.
Like Sophie’s Choice.
Billy Graham and Benny Hinn are products of Nazism…Facism…..Roman Catholicism!
(Above picture is a snapshot of Billy Graham posing as Jack Ready a Secret Service Agent at Love Field Airport in Dallas the day of the assassination of JFK. He is signaling someone after Jackie Kennedy received a Lamb chops puppet which she hid under the red roses, the same red roses that she mused about receiving in later interviews , and failing to mention the puppet! I would guess that is where she hid a weapon used to kill JFK and/or to create a diversion which Roy Kellerman did mention hearing a flurry of gun shots. Whatever was hidden inside the puppet was important enough for Billy Graham/Jack Ready to make a signal to someone….probably another agent/press/clergyman)
”Tyrannosaurus was a bipedal carnivore with a massive skull balanced by a long, heavy tail. Relative to the large and powerful hindlimbs, Tyrannosaurus forelimbs were small, though unusually powerful for their size, and bore two clawed digits.“
Their massive skull is Golgotha:
The place of the skull where Jesus of Nazareth was nailed to the cross.
Their works are their veil!
They are evil.
They are Evangelicals: Evil Angels: Beasts
2They shall put you out of the synagogues: yea, the time cometh,
that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service.
3And these things will they do unto you,
because they have not known the Father, nor me.
4But these things have I told you, that when the time shall come, ye may remember that I told you of them. And these things I said not unto you at the beginning, because I was with you.
The pictures of Billy Graham are snapshots from Greta Van Susteren’s interview of him talking about the Bush family .
The last picture is of a man (who I think is none other than Billy Graham in disguise) at the airport with JFK in Dallas less than an hour before the assassination right before he enrages
because he is caught on camera signaling to someone with his two claws
as Jacky receives something at the fence line.
10And the fifth angel poured out his vial upon the seat of the beast; and his kingdom was full of darkness;
and they gnawed their tongues for pain,
11And blasphemed the God of heaven because of their pains (panis?=demons)
and their sores (roses?),
and repented not of their deeds.
Please read all of the parts of the
Other articles can be found at
Take ye away the stone
And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church;
and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
These are my latest post on my blogs :
In these posts I think I have associated the players involved in a conspiracy led by and inspired by the
Synoptic prince of this world
for the Assassination of President Kennedy and the Destruction of the United States,
and the Great Deception and to fulfill
The Abomination of Desolation
in our time!
The players are Billy Graham, Rev. Wilkerson, The Pope (Ratzinger) and his brother, Nellie Connally, Jackie Kennedy double, the Secret Service, and many more who by the spirit of the false Synoptic Gospels and their determination to keep power to deceive mankind about the truth about why Jesus came and who He truly is.
I believe I have connected the relationship of Rev. David Wilkerson to Billy Graham and I believe Rev. Wilkersons last blog post was his attempt to connect himself to Billy Graham
and that may be why he was killed.
Others have connected Billy Graham to Roman Catholicism quite sufficiently. Billy Graham’s influence especially of Presidents of our country *with the exception of JFK* was premeditated as is the Destruction of the United States and I believe he was and is influenced by a False God of Rome!
I believe that David Wilkerson was “Q’ ed by this False Spirit or had certain and actual knowledge of the events ie
Privy to the planned events such as 9-11 etc.,
but was under Rome’s influence and power
and I believe that Billy Graham is also under that same umbrella.
Just because prophecy may be fulfilled does not mean it is not premeditated murder of thousands of people as in 9=11 and premeditated murder of millions to come
just so that Rome and the Devil can stay in power.
Jesus would not do that!
but the false Synoptic Jesus created and authored by Rome would do that!
The assassination of JFK was to confound the world about the prophecy in Revelation about the beast:
And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.
to take the eyes off of Rome and the fulfillment of that prophecy which leads to who is in power at this time-
Pope Benedict XVI aka Joseph Alois Ratzinger!
If the prophecy was about the United States then the younger George Bush would be the 7th and of the 8th in that prophecy. However. George Bush believes that when he looks in the eyes of Pope Benedict XVI he believes he sees God. And while I believe that George Bush is influenced by the Pope in a big way he is not a prince nor a king, but the Pope is a prince and a king! George Bush also was heavily influenced by Billy Graham who is influenced and controlled by Rome and their disbelief in Jesus written about in the Gospel of John!
IF they believed in Jesus of the Gospel of John,
how in the world can they believe the Synoptic Gospels,
since the Synoptic Gospels are antithetical to the Gospel of John!
I believe I show this in many of my posts on my blogs which I hope you will take the time to read and ponder my thoughts and consider the possibility that
the opposition to the Gospel of John by the Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke
and their epistles are authored with the
DELIBERATE INTENT TO DECEIVE!
The articles are linked on the blog site:
And if you start at the top you will see my progression to these conclusions!
I wrote a few articles about the Gates of Hell and in relationship to the verse at the top by Matthew,
but one in particular I hope you will read:
Roman Catholicism believes that Peter received the keys,
in other words they hold the keys!
The article linked above called Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven disproves that idea, in my opinion!
I believe that many of the people involved in the assassination of President Kennedy
are part of the greater conspiracy of this premise to protect the Papacy and their own status, power, and money
and others are just plain afraid!
They protect him and he protects them, they promote him and he promotes them, they enrich him and he enriches them, etc
until he doesn’t need them anymore!
Case in Point : Ernie Manouse of Innerviews with Ernie Manouse who interviewed Nellie Connally and who has done very well for himself in his ART.
“A native of Binghamton, New York and a graduate of Loyola University Chicago, Manouse started with NBC Network News, and then moved into radio with WLS in Chicago, and back to TV at HoustonPBS.”
Loyola is a Jesuit Catholic university!
Surprise! OF course, he does well because he is a mouse a brown noser!
One of many mice that propagate their own BS !!! He interviewed Nellie Connally when she was promoting her book for her children, him being one of them. He built his career on his sexual orientation. Not too hard to understand why he mentally and spiritually caressed Nellie Connally! I watched that video quite a bit to try to understand why he never asked any questions of value or anything relevant. He would close his eyes almost as if savoring the assassination of JFK. It must have something to do with being a Jesuit!
It was disgusting!
As far as his climb to success….
it was in the bag!
We will delve into that
in Another post!
Here is an article about Rev. Wilkerson’s prophecies:
“Major cities all across America will experience riots and blazing fires—such as we saw in Watts, Los Angeles, years ago. There will be riots and fires in cities worldwide.”
“What we are experiencing now is not a recession, not even a depression. We are under God’s wrath.”
“First, I give you a practical word I received for my own direction. If possible lay in store a thirty-day supply of non-perishable food, toiletries and other essentials.”
David Wilkerson could very well be telling the truth about the
future destruction in America,
because he may be involved with
the destruction of America
by association and by his allegiances!
His death may have occurred because he rebelled against those powers and allegiances
that created his ministry and controlled him and he may have come to realize the deception!
I think that Nellie Connally proved herself in her own words and mistakes to be influenced/controlled
and associated with that same power and deception,
which quite possibly could have been premeditated as her rebellion to that same power and deception!
One thing for sure she made some big blunders which I shall try to show in Part 2 of Nellie Connally,
but first I wanted to write about what I believe may be false prophecy written by Rev. Wilkerson, because of his involvement, his association, his knowledge of the premeditation to deceive and the murder of many people in the process in order to fulfill prophecy about the whore of Babylon which I believe is in the works presently and in the past
IE LONG TERM PLANS to DECEIVE and DESTROY!
I think that Nellie Connally is part of the deception! Here is the obituary of Nellie Connally:
Survivors include her daughter,
Sharon Connally Ammann,
and two sons, John B. Connally III and Mark Connally.
This is what Rev. David Wilkerson may be referring to
in his prophecy about the destruction
soon to come to the US.
I think he knew that America has been set up by Rome and it’s minions of slaves
to cause a major meltdown via bridges blown apart,
especially around New York City and New Jersey etc.,
because they built in to these structures
the way to destroy these same structures!
The Synoptic Way
They will probably use false signs and wonders
to make you capitulate to their beliefs
and use their power to manipulate our leaders, because they have rigged these bridges and tunnels with devises
in order to scare, to blackmail, to control, and ultimately to kill and destroy!
If they would do what I have described
we need to do something about it before it is too late.
I bet the stones have something to do with it!
Swiss-born engineer, who settled in the United States in 1904, and over 35 years designed bridges in the N. Y. area. In 1925 he joined the Port of New York Authority for which he designed the Bayonne Bridge (opened in 1931) as a graceful parabolic two-hinged steel-arch structure, which made his name. In the same year his George Washington Bridge was opened, with twice the span of any then existing suspension-bridge, and steel-framed towers suggesting vestigial Classicism. His elegant Bronx-Whitestone Suspension Bridge was the first to use shallow plate-girders as stiffeners instead of the more usual deep trusses. In 1946 he formed a partnership with Charles Whitney, establishing one of the leading engineering firms in the world. His majestic Verrazano-Narrows Bridge, NYC (completed 1964), was even longer than his earlier structures.
Lindenthal also appointed Othmar Ammann, who would later achieve fame in building twentieth-century suspension bridges such as the George Washington and Verrazano-Narrows bridges, as assistant chief engineer. Ammann explained the significance that his mentor placed on the visual appearance of his bridge:
Famous bridges by Ammann include:
Bust in George Washington Bridge bus station
- George Washington Bridge (opened October 24, 1931)
- Bayonne Bridge (opened November 15, 1931)
- Triborough Bridge (opened July 11, 1936)
- Bronx-Whitestone Bridge (opened April 29, 1939)
- Throgs Neck Bridge (opened January 11, 1961)
- Verrazano Narrows Bridge (opened November 21, 1964.
In addition to his work on bridges
Ammann also directed the planning and construction
of the Lincoln Tunnel.
Participation in the following structures
& large-scale projects
Chief engineer:Bayonne Bridge (1931), Bronx-Whitestone Bridge (1939). George Washington Bridge (1931). Triborough Bridge (1936)
Bridge engineer: Goethals Bridge (1928), Outerbridge Crossing (1928)
Designer: Wards Island Bridge (1951)
Design consultant: Delaware Memorial Bridge (1951)
55And many women were there beholding afar off, which followed Jesus from Galilee, ministering unto him:56Among which was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Joses, and the mother of Zebedees children.
The mother of Jesus is not mentioned!
40There were also women looking on afar off: among whom was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the less and of Joses, and Salome;41(Who also, when he was in Galilee, followed him, and ministered unto him;) and many other women which came up with him unto Jerusalem.
Again, the mother of Jesus is not mentioned!
49And all his acquaintance, and the women that followed him from Galilee, stood afar off, beholding these things.
the mother of Jesus is not mentioned!
The Synoptic gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke
do not mention
the mother of Jesus,
as if they don’t know who she is!
IN THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS (MATTHEW, MARK, AND LUKE)
ALL OF THE WOMEN THAT MINISTERED TO JESUS
WERE STANDING AFAR OFF!
Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother‘s sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, andMary Magdalene.
The gospel of John differs in that the few women that stood by are
near the cross!
(Close enough for Jesus to talk to his mother
and to the disciple called John.)
The disciple who wrote the gospel of John
to know the mother of Jesus!
Only in the Gospel of John is the mother of Jesus mentioned!
BECAUSE JOHN KNEW HER!
IF you take a sentence and take out punctuation- it changes the meaning of a sentence. Punctuation was added later to the bible.
IN the verse above (John 19:25) there are four women standing by the cross of Jesus.
In the verse below (John 19:25) there are only three women.
All I did was take out the commas!
By doing this it makes more sense!
Instead of two sisters called by the same name “Mary” there is only one.
I don’t know about you, but I have never known anyone who was called by the same name as their sister. Not even twins!
It is stupid to assume that two sisters are called by the same name!
Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother and his mother‘s sister Mary the wife of Cleophas and Mary Magdalene.
IN my opinion, the ands in the sentence seem to separate the people.
Since they did not use commas back then, it would make sense to separate the people with a conjunction like “and”.
If John the disciple wanted us to know that the name of Jesus’s mother was Mary then he would have written that sentence like this:
Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother Mary and his mother’s sister Mary the wife of Cleophas and Mary Magdalene.
Now there stood by the cross of Jesus Mary his mother and his mother’s sister Mary the wife of Cleophas and Mary Magdalene.
Otherwise we MIGHT AS WELL say that Jesus’s mother is Mary Magdalene IF we can say that she is called Mary as well as her sister who is Mary!
IT IS RIDICULOUS!
but instead he writes:
Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother and his mother‘s sister Mary the wife of Cleophas and Mary Magdalene.
Now if you compare the verses in the synoptic with John you have three women named in each verse.
but you have some different names given to these women.
and Mary the mother of James and Joses
and the mother of Zebedees children
and Mary the mother of James the less and of Joses,
and his mother‘s sister Mary the wife of Cleophas
and Mary Magdalene.
IF you take out the obvious match you would take out Mary Magdalene since all three gospels agree that she was there!
So lets do that!
and Mary the mother of James and Joses
and the mother of Zebedees children
and Mary the mother of James the less and of Joses,
and his mother‘s sister Mary the wife of Cleophas
Now, if you take out the obvious match out of these verses, you would take out Mary the mother of James and Joses and it’s corresponding matches!
So lets do that!
and the mother of Zebedees children
SO the left over names are:
1) the mother of Zebedees children
3) his mother
Is there a match we can make?
26When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son!27Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home.
Definitions of the leftover names above!
noun - BIBLE father of the disciples James and John: Matt. 4:21
Origin: LL(Ec) Zebedaeus < Gr(Ec) Zebedaios, prob. < Heb zevadya, lit.,
God has bestowed < zavad, to donate, bestow + ya, God
Possibly from the same root as the greeting “Shalom”.
I believe that Salome who is the mother of Zebedee’s children could be the mother of Jesus!
Who did Jesus entrust his mother to when he died?
To the disciple standing by that wrote the gospel of John!
The author of the gospel of John never did call Jesus’s mother by the name of Mary!
SO if you trust Luke and Mark (John Mark) who were followers of Saul/Paul/Aul whose mother is called Mary who bestowed much labour on them, then believe them.
6Greet Mary, who bestowed much labour on us.
I don’t believe them!
They have proved to me their untrustworthiness
as I have written about numerous times in my posts!
The synoptic gospels can’t even get in order the events,
or name the people involved,
and they embellish the events with their own imaginations,
make up i.e. lie about what Jesus said and did,
therefore they do not deserve to be given that trust!
We have all been brought up to believe that the mother of Jesus is named Mary, but the evidence THAT I TRUST leads me to a different conclusion!
ANOTHER REASON I DON’T THINK MARY IS THE MOTHER OF JESUS IS BECAUSE JESUS NEVER CALLED HIS MOTHER MARY!
JESUS CALLED His mother WOMAN!
5And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
Here are some interesting articles
The Synoptic gospels are FULL of errors and contradictions within themselves and lack any true credibility.
We are supposed to accept that Jesus’s mother is called Mary and has a sister named Mary so that Roman Catholicism can venerate (worship) some strange woman they have named Mary and made into a Goddess
and call her the Mother of God!
IT IS ABSOLUTELY the ANTI-CHRIST!
The use of the name “Lucifer” in reference to a fallen angel stems from an interpretation of Isaiah 14:3-20, a passage that speaks of a particular Babylonian King, to whom it gives the title of “Day Star”, “Morning Star” (in Latin, lucifer), as fallen or destined to fall from the heavens or sky. In 2 Peter 1:19
True or False Apostles?
1And Saul was consenting unto his death. And at that time there was a great persecution against the church which was at Jerusalem; and they were all scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles.2And devout men carried Stephen to his burial, and made great lamentation over him.3As for Saul, he made havock of the church, entering into every house, and haling men and women committed them to prison.4Therefore they that were scattered abroad went every where preaching the word.
Except the apostles?
Does that make sense at all?
Remember, in the gospel of John, when the apostles were behind closed doors right after Jesus was crucified, because they were afraid!
The question is…which apostles is Luke referring to that he says remained in Jerusalem?
I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars:
Quite possibly it was the false apostles spoken about in Revelation 2:2 that remained in Jerusalem!
1And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest,2And desired of him letters to Damascus to the synagogues, that if he found any of this way, whether they were men or women, he might bring them bound unto Jerusalem.3And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven:4And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?
IF Saul was out to get the disciples…why wouldn’t he try to get them through infiltration? And why in the world would he not apprehend the apostles that remained in Jerusalem unless they were charlatans!
32And as they came out, they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name: him they compelled to bear his cross.
And they compel one Simon a Cyrenian, who passed by, coming out of the country, the father of Alexander and Rufus,
to bear his cross.
Paul is speaking next:
So is Saul/Paul saying that Rufus is is his brother?
If the above is true,
that could mean that Alexander is Saul/Paul
the son of Simon!
And as they led him away, they laid hold upon one Simon, a Cyrenian, coming out of the country, and on him they laid the cross, that he might bear it after Jesus.
The only gospel that does not mention Simon of Cyrene is the Gospel of John.
As I have mentioned numerous times in other posts: John was very succinct about his accounts of what happened with Jesus Christ and he is the only chosen apostle to have his gospel included in the bible.
13And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,14And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
41And Jesus sat over against the treasury, and beheld how the people cast money into the treasury: and many that were rich cast in much.42And there came a certain poor widow, and she threw in two mites, which make a farthing.43And he called unto him his disciples, and saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That this poor widow hath cast more in, than all they which have cast into the treasury:
I can just see Jesus sitting over against the treasury! GIve me a break.
I’m sure most people have heard of the Shroud of Turin and recently they have discovered two mites on each of the eyes of the images. Read last paragraph in the link below about it:
And more items of interest many of which were mentioned in biblical accounts such as “crucifixion nail, a Roman spear, a sponge on a stick, a crown of thorns, two scourges, a large hammer, a pair of pliers, and two desecrated Jewish phylacteries or prayer boxes.” Please read the link below:
There are burn holes on the shroud that form the letter “L” .
Please read the link below:
Makes me think of Lucifer….may be his signature?
Now there are also some letters on the Shroud of Turin: UCAI. Please read link below:
In 2000, Cardinal Ratzinger wrote that the Shroud of Turin is ″a truly mysterious image, which no human artistry was capable of producing. In some inexplicable way, it appeared imprinted upon cloth and claimed to show the true face of Christ, the crucified and risen Lord.”
Pope Benedict XVI has not publicly commented on the Shroud’s authenticity, but has taken steps that indirectly affect the Shroud. In June 2008 he approved the public display of the Shroud in the Spring of 2010 and stated that he would like to go to Turin to see it along with other pilgrims. In April 2009 Pope Benedict XVI advanced the beatification process of Sister Maria Pierina De Micheli who coined the Holy Face Medal, based on Secondo Pia’s photograph of the Shroud, by formally recognizing a miracle attributed to her.
15And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.16And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:17And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.18Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
The image of the beast should both speak! Whew!
That does seem awful coincidental
that Revelation 13:15 would use the word BOTH
when referring to the image of the beast and
the Shroud of Turin is made of two images!
Letters in Hebrew have been discovered on the Shroud of Turin.
By the way, Hebrew letters represent numbers!
Please notice the Bear and the Moor Head and the Scallop!
Moor of Freising: The Moor’s head is an heraldic charge associated with Freising, Germany.
Corbinian’s bear: A legend states that while traveling to Rome, Saint Corbinian’s pack horse was killed by a bear. He commanded the bear to carry the load. Once he arrived, he released it from his service, and it returned to Bavaria. The implication is that “Christianity tamed and domesticated the ferocity of paganism and thus laid the foundations for a great civilization in the Duchy of Bavaria.” At the same time, Corbinian’s bear, as God’s beast of burden, symbolizes the weight of office that Benedict now carries.
Scallop shell: The symbolism of the scallop shell is multiple, one of the meanings is thought to represent Saint Augustine. While a doctoral candidate in 1953, Fr. Joseph Ratzinger wrote his dissertation on The People of God and the House of God in Augustine’s Teaching is always about the Church, and therefore has a personal connection with the thought of this great Doctor of the Church.
Luke of the gospels was a physician!
13When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?14And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.
27And Jesus went out, and his disciples, into the towns of Caesarea Philippi: and by the way he asked his disciples, saying unto them, Whom do men say that I am?28And they answered, John the Baptist; but some say, Elias; and others, One of the prophets
Why would Jesus Christ, the Son of God, ask
Whom do men say that I the Son of man am? or Whom do men say that I am?
If He is the Son of God, wouldn’t He know who he was?
Wouldn’t he know what they were saying about Him?
The true Jesus Christ, the Son of God, was well aware of what people
were thinking and saying who He was!
15He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
16And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.
17And Jesus answered and said unto him,
Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee,
but my Father which is in heaven.
29And he saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
And Peter answereth and saith unto him,
Thou art the Christ.
18And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.19And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
This Synoptic Jesus tells Peter who he is……as if he did not know.
Peter just told Jesus who he was, but now Jesus is telling Peter who he is!
He had just miraculously fed 4000 people out of a pittance of food earlier
and he did not want his disciples to tell anyone who he was?
Why were those 4000 people hanging out with him fasting for 3 days
that he fed with a few fishes and a few loaves of bread?
Did the 4000 men not know who they were either?
This is utter nonsense!
What was in their fish?
This is an attempt to build a church on Peter’s name.
Then Jesus charges them to tell no man that he is Jesus the Christ after he goes through this strange conversation with Peter about who he is etc.
The True Messiah knows who he is
and what people were thinking
and even what would happen in the future!
If he didn’t know who he was then how in the world would he expect us to figure it out?
21From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.22Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.23But he turned, and said unto Peter,
Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me:
for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
30And he charged them that they should tell no man of him.31And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again.32And he spake that saying openly. And Peter took him, and began to rebuke him.33But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples,
he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan:
for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men.
The Gospel of Matthew 6:17 above has Jesus BLESSING Peter and giving Peter the keys to the kingdom
and then tells him that he is the rock which the church will be built upon
and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it
and within a short time (like within the same conversation) Matthew 6:23
Jesus REBUKES Peter
and says that Peter is SATAN!
Not only does he say he is Satan, but also an offense to him!
What happened to the gates of hell not prevailing against the church?
It lasted a whole minute!
This is like a Japanese Monster movie dubbed in English
out of sync!
At the very least the Jesus that “charged them to tell no man” that he was the christ obviously was the anti-christ! The Gospel of Matthew’s Jesus was the antichrist by his own words as recorded in the Gospel of Matthew it seems. You can read the post called Tell No Man linked on Merangue’s Blog.
In the Gospel of John
At the Last Supper,
after Jesus and his apostles had eaten,
He talks to his disciples about who He is and explains Himself to them
and what is going to happen to Him and to them!
After he had risen from the grave and visited them
he gives them the HOLY GHOST!
21Then said Jesus to them again,
Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you.
22And when he had said this, he breathed on them,
and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:
23Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them;
and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained.
NO CLOVEN TONGUES OF FIRE!
NO SPEAKING IN TONGUES!
NO MIGHTY WIND!
(Consistent with Genesis and the creation of the world and the creation of mankind.)
OBVIOUSLY, JESUS DID NOT GIVE THE KEYS of the KINGDOM TO PETER !!!
There are no keys!
THAT IS PROPAGANDA!
THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW AND MARK
HAVE TURNED THE TRUTH UPSIDE DOWN!
They have managed to make Jesus sound like a lunatic,
which is typical for the Synoptic Jesus!
You either believe in Jesus or you don’t. You believe in God or your don’t. Which God?
I BELIEVE in the Jesus who acted like a sane person which is in the Gospel of John and who he glorified, His Father.
I believe in the Jesus that knew who he was and didn’t need others to tell him.
I think the Synoptic Gospels are like actors/decoys
interacting with a hologram of what they want to have occurred
in order to change facts and twist the truth to replace the truth with fiction and to create confusion.
When doing the CBS transcriptions of the JFK assassination found on Merangue’s Blog I used their film and the reporters reporting and added my two cents of what I saw occurring that they didn’t notice such as the puppet being handed over the fence line at the airport in Dallas to Jackie Kennedy and her tucking the puppet in her roses. The people on the side of the fence line with the President….his entourage are also similar to people interacting with a hologram of the event that is filmed. Some of them act as if they know what is occurring or going to occur and are witnessing it and acting in it at the same time. some of those faces are recognizable. The gospel of Matthew other than the first few chapters does the same thing in a way without a documentary to back it up.
The genealogy is a different matter and is only found in the Gospel of Matthew. However in a few other posts I cover that subject and my inconclusive conclusions (because I am not a bible scholar and hold no degrees) with the help of a few other apologists who have researched it demonstrate the catch-22 of it’s proof.
The story that goes along with the genealogy account seems to indicate a pact or royal alliance between England and Germany/Rome.
I don’t recall many Jewish people with the name Elizabeth, though I could be wrong. The cousin of Mary and since there seem to be many Mary’s to add to the confusion. One in particular called Mary wife of Chuza which seems to be a BIG CLUE. And then we never hear about Joseph after a certain point. Not a hint. He just disappears. We do however hear about Joseph of Ari-mathea.
Kind of reminds me of Benghazi. Everyone more concerned with the IRS abuses (which by the way have a long history of abuses for the average middle class American) than figuring out about all the lies, the coverup of Benghazi, the UN speech by Barack Obama’s promise/pledge about Islam soon after Benghazi. Even Franklin Graham was insulted by the IRS, or so he says and I don’t recall that he was insulted nor alarmed by Barack Obama’s pledge at the UN,
nor anyone else that I know of.
What happened to the witnesses? Were they executed by executive order or was it a mandate?
The Tradition of Christmas
For those that defend Christmas the tradition such as O’reilly who staunchly and vehemently defends the holiday to honor Jesus why on earth would he laud a musician Herbie Hancock for his religion of Buddhism? Seemed odd to me. I know Herbie Hancock’s music is definitely laudable, but his religion? Course Roman Catholic Jesuits prefer Buddhism to delineating the differences in the gospels which are many. I guess it’s taboo. He just wrote a book called Killing Jesus because he thought or felt that God had prompted him to write it in his third installment of the trilogy about killing:
the first Killing Lincoln and the second Killing Kennedy
and the third of the trilogy and last but not least Killing Jesus.
And by the way I will include at the bottom of the page the flags of the Middle East and parts of North Africa and Italy and many of them are the colors of Christmas except a few. I wondered if since Jesus was Jewish why the colors of Christmas aren’t blue and white instead of green, red and white. Seems odd since the instructions in the Old Testament for certain housing and decor are blue and white and REAL GOLD (not credit!)
Seems to me in honor of Jesus
even though O’reilly admitted Jesus probably wasn’t born in December
we would celebrate his birth with the colors of his country and his ancestry
but then maybe Christmas really isn’t about Jesus.
18Now in the morning as he returned into the city, he hungered.19And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away.20And when the disciples saw it, they marvelled, saying, How soon is the fig tree withered away!21Jesus answered and said unto them, Verily I say unto you, If ye have faith, and doubt not, ye shall not only do this which is done to the fig tree, but also if ye shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; it shall be done.22And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive.
This rendition of Jesus Christ in the gospel of Matthew ie the Synoptic Jesus
is having a hissy fit,
and not only that, he was talking to a fig tree
AND IF THAT ISN’T BAD ENOUGH
SUPPOSEDLY HE HAD A REASON
FOR THIS MADNESS
because it had not produced fruit for him to eat
as he expected because he was hungry that particular morning.
If Jesus can feed 5000 men with a few loaves of bread,
why could he not make the fig tree produce fruit for him presently?
IF Jesus Christ, the Son of God,
knows what happens 2000 years in advance,
you would think he would know that that fig tree did not have fruit on it
before he hoped to eat figs from it that morning.
Maybe he fasted for too long and lost his good senses. Sounds like Peter in the book of Acts on his rooftop praying and fasting.
WHY WOULD THE disciples marvel at the withering fig tree?
Like I said, if it were cursed by Jesus wouldn’t they expect it to die?
But, of course, this is rubbish!
Why would the disciples want to have faith enough to curse a fig tree?
It is stupid!
IT makes Jesus look insane and his followers look like stupid idiots,
but very Synoptic!
I’m surprised that this SYNOPTIC Jesus Christ didn’t
But he does eventually because he is Synoptic!
Please read about the Synoptic Source or rather the SS!
12 And on the morrow, when they were come from Bethany, he was hungry:13And seeing a fig tree afar off having leaves, he came, if haply he might find any thing thereon: and when he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for the time of figs was not yet.14And Jesus answered and said unto it, No man eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever. And his disciples heard it.
He comes haply?
Sounds like he was skipping with flowers in his hair.
What did the Synoptic Jesus expect,
if the time of figs was not yet?
Obviously, the fig tree was not ready to bear its fruit!
IF only Simon of Cyrene had been there!
This is mocking Jesus in the gospel of John when he says his time is not yet!
6Then Jesus said unto them, My time is not yet come: but your time is alway ready.
Jesus Christ did not go around cursing trees!
Jesus Christ had just raised Lazarus who had been dead for four days.
The Jesus that is propagandized in the Synoptic gospels
cursing the fig tree is
and may I add…….
Why in the world would Jesus Christ, the Son of God, waste his time cursing a fig tree?
IN between these verses in the gospel of Mark, Jesus Christ overturns the tables of the money changers in the temple, but actuality Jesus overturned the tables at an earlier time in the Gospel of John soon after the wedding in Cana.
The Synoptics do not include the wedding in Cana, because the Synoptic authors were not there!
I suppose that is what the fig tree curse mock is all about….
the Synoptic Author was jealous that he was not chosen!
The Synoptic writers go to the extreme to make Jesus Christ look like a weirdo,
because He was upset with the money changers
and the degradation of the place of worship
The reason for their extreme ridicule is because
they were the money changers in the place of worship
and they had turned it into a marketplace!
The Synoptic gospels are trying to confuse events and add their inane teaching
to fill-in space because they are full of air
where the true teaching and true miracles are discarded
and replaced with their
19And when even was come, he went out of the city.20And in the morning, as they passed by, they saw the fig tree dried up from the roots.21And Peter calling to remembrance saith unto him, Master, behold, the fig tree which thou cursedst is withered away.22And Jesus answering saith unto them, Have faith in God.23For verily I say unto you, That whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith.
Here the author of the gospel of Mark is also mocking Peter “calling into remembrance“.
He calls into remembrance the fig tree that was cursed
moments before as in the gospel of Matthew
and a day later in the gospel of Mark.
Which is similar to the contradiction between the
Last Supper in the gospel of John and the Last Supper in the Synoptic Gospels
which are on two different days.
Then Jesus tells Peter to have faith in God because the tree that was cursed is withered away.
This is utterly ridiculous!
(I CERTAINLY WILL NOT HAVE FAITH BECAUSE OF A FIG TREE !!!!!)
and THIS INANE TEACHING OF THE SYNOPTIC AUTHOR OF THE SYNOPTIC JESUS
has a great deal to do with
NOT ONLY IS THIS RIDICULOUS
BUT AN INSULT TO
Here is a site on the internet I found explaining the fig tree curse/miracle. It is at Christian Courier.com, “a place for reasonable faith” and here is their explanation for what occurred,
but not really.
Why Did Jesus “Curse” the Fig Tree?
In this study he argues that the tree was probably not on someone’s property so therefore Jesus had the right to pronounce judgement upon a free fig tree. I guess that has been an objection to some, whether Jesus had the right to kill a tree. hmmmmmm. Then in number four of this study, he says that Jesus did not perceive that the tree only had leaves from afar even though Jesus is a deity and was expecting some fruit. His explanation for Jesus not being “on the ball” was that Jesus was not always in a deity-mode, sometimes Jesus was lazy and did not use his deity-ism. Because there was no fruit under the leaves that he did not see, he cursed the fig tree. By the way, this person is one of many that write and educate the masses justifying these non-events because they are not willing to discern and come to grips with the fact that some of the gospel is not true. They also hate Israel and this writer thinks God is done with Israel and he is so far off the track. They also have been trained since their birth to believe that the bible is INERRANT. Kind of like how they teach that the Pope is infallible. They have been trained not to question scripture, because they have been taught/brainwashed (as most of us have) and are just passing it on. It is deception and because someone tags the name of Jesus Christ to the insanity included in the bible and their own propaganda against Israel they will justify IT any witch way.
So, Jesus Christ used this curse of the fig tree as an object lesson for his disciples.
What in the world did they learn?
They learned that you can remove a mountain with your faith
somehow demonstrated through the cursing of a fig tree.
This is what is called “mocking a mountain out of a MOLE HILL.”
This is UNREASONABLE FAITH!
It is not in the Gospel of John, because it did not happen!
Jesus did not come to curse a fig tree!
Basically, the moral to this ridiculous non-event is to replace the fig tree
with the mustard tree
The deceiver came to curse, to ridicule, and to sow confusion, discord and deception.
IT IS A DUMB STORY!
I believe this dichotomy has to do with Nathanael under the fig tree
and that Jesus called Nathanael “a true Israelite
in whom there is no guile.”
However, Luke’s rendition of Jesus Christ does!
29For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck.
s30Then shall they begin to say to the mountains, Fall on us; and to the hills, Cover us.
31For if they do these things in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry?
I DON’T KNOW……DO TELL!
Oh yea. Luke knows because he was there when they did it ……INDEED!
THEY PROBABLY ALL WILL JOIN WITH ROME TO FORM A UNIVERSAL RELIGION ….NOT TO OFFEND ANYONE….
AS LONG AS IT IS HEADED BY ROME!
THE MOTHER HEN
WHO WITH HER INFIL–TRAITORS MAKES MEN
Besides isn’t cursing a tree ….a spell? A trick. Cursing is Paul’s business! Paul does so in the books of the bible that promote him. In fact, it is Paul who catches men in their guile by being crafty:
2 Corinthians 12:16
But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile.
Please view this you tube:
A few weeks back I received my daily The Berean Daily Verse and Comment which I have enjoyed often in the past few years.
The article from the daily e-mail that I have linked from The Berean is called:
For many years I thought Berean meant searching the scriptures daily for the truth, but in reality it was just a sect from Berea. I don’t mean to demean the writer or the site of The Berean, but this particular article shows how
swallowed the lies of the antichrist
Hook, Line and Sinker!
In the article linked above The Berean says that Jesus was in so much pain when He was on the cross that He did not know what He was doing or saying, and that is why He drank the vinegar, even though he had made a promise at the
SYNOPTIC Last Supper
about not drinking the wine,
For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come.
but I assure you that Jesus Christ did know what He was doing and saying when He was on the cross,
at least in the gospel of John!
The authors of the Synoptic Gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke deliberately made up their gospels to mock Jesus Christ and His apostles, and many generations of sincere men, women and children, including myself, who have read their gospels and believed their lies.
Recently, I wrote an article about how Christians hurt the truth by denying the truth:
Do Christians really want to know the truth about God and His Son,
or do we want to keep bouncing the ball?
For the sake of our children shouldn’t we try to see the truth and overcome the deceptions that have been included in the the bible?
The discord in the gospels should not be overlooked!
We only hurt ourselves by dismissing
the inconsistencies and contradictions in the gospels!
It is called HYPOCRISY!
In the article I linked from The Berean it makes excuses about the promise that Jesus made to his disciples at the Last Supper when in actuality Jesus Christ breaks that “Synoptic promise” on the cross (because the Synoptic promise did not happen, but was included in the Synoptic gospels to deceive) and it was done on purpose! It was done to mock, demean, and to make Jesus Christ (the true Messiah) a liar, as many other parts of the Synoptic gospels seem to do
and to confuse us.
We have been played for fools by the lies. That’s why the popular Christian symbol is the fish. You have to fool the fish to catch it by offering it a worm and there are plenty of worms in the Synoptic gospels to alarm us that
it’s a trick of the FISHERMAN,
ie., the antichrist.
IT is sick, and by IT, I mean, the antichrist and ITS’ Subordinates!
When Jesus Christ was baptized by John the Baptist and the Spirit of God lighted upon Him,
was it a fish?
No, the Spirit of God was like a dove!
32And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him.33And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.34And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God.
When Jesus Christ talked to Peter on the third visit by the Sea of Galilee after he had risen,
did Jesus ask Peter three times to
Feed my frys, Feed my fish, Feed my fish?
No, Jesus said the verses below:
15So when they had dined, Jesus saith to Simon Peter, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me more than these? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my lambs.16He saith to him again the second time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? He saith unto him, Yea, Lord; thou knowest that I love thee. He saith unto him, Feed my sheep.17He saith unto him the third time, Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me? Peter was grieved because he said unto him the third time, Lovest thou me? And he said unto him, Lord, thou knowest all things; thou knowest that I love thee. Jesus saith unto him, Feed my sheep.
makes excuses for Jesus Christ consuming the vinegar at the cross.
Vinegar is sour wine!
“Vinegar is an acidic liquid processed from the fermentation of ethanol in a process that yields its key ingredient, acetic acid (ethanoic acid). It also may come in a diluted form. The acetic acid concentration typically ranges from 4% to 8% by volume for table vinegar and up to 18% forpickling. Natural vinegars also contain small amounts of tartaric acid, citric acid, and other acids. Vinegar has been used since ancient times and is an important element in European, Asian, and other cuisines.”
The word “vinegar” derives from the Old French vin aigre, meaning “sour wine”
27And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and gave it to them, saying, Drink ye all of it;28For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.29But I say unto you, I will not drink henceforth of this fruit of the vine, until that day when I drink it new with you in my Father’s kingdom.
A testament is a contract or covenant!
23And he took the cup, and when he had given thanks, he gave it to them: and they all drank of it.24And he said unto them, This is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many.25Verily I say unto you, I will drink no more of the fruit of the vine, until that day that I drink it new in the kingdom of God.
17And he took the cup, and gave thanks, and said, Take this, and divide it among yourselves:18For I say unto you, I will not drink of the fruit of the vine, until the kingdom of God shall come19And he took bread, and gave thanks, and brake it, and gave unto them, saying, This is my body which is given for you: this do in remembrance of me.20Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood, which is shed for you.
Could the above covenant with many
be the covenant with many
spoken of in Daniel?
26And after threescore and two weeks shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself:
and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.27And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
Why would the true Messiah
The Son of God
make a false covenant?
The covenant must have been made by
a False Messiah,
A False Jesus!
Most of what is described in the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke the night that Jesus Christ was arrested did not occur. If you read the Gospel of John it is totally absent of the discussion of the wine and the bread and the synoptic promise.
Not one part of the verses above happened at the “Last Supper” in the gospel of John.
The synoptic gospels do not include the prayer or the washing that Jesus Christ performs on the feet of his disciples in the gospel of John.
John was the only one who was present at the Last Supper of the three gospel writers
the night of the arrest.
The writer of The Berean is trying to excuse the mistake about Jesus taking the vinegar at the cross because He was in such pain and did not know what He was doing, because if He did know what He was doing, then the synoptic Kingdom of God has already come by Him drinking the vinegar at the cross.
The fact is Jesus Christ was fully aware of what He was doing despite the pain He endured on the cross.
Right before He said “I thirst”, He was arranging for the care of His mother to a disciple.
26When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son!
27Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home.
That is acutely aware!
He also knew by taking the vinegar
that He asked for
one of many signs
for us about the false gospels that He knew would be written about Him.
He knew ahead of time everything to the last detail. Jesus is the spirit of prophecy!
Before He died He said, “It is finished,” because He was extremely aware of what He was doing every second and always!
Do not underestimate the Son of God in any situation and in every circumstance!
(It is human nature for us to under quantify and under qualify Him,
but it is our mistake when we do so.)—— I do it all the time….I should know!
Here is another sign:
The Synoptic Gospels forgot to write that Jesus was pierced in his side
after he had taken the sour wine to test if he was dead IMO
and only the Gospel of John tells us about it.
There is something very wrong between the Synoptic Gospels and the Gospel of John!
If we are truly seeking the truth about God and His Son
we can NOT allow these contradictions to stand
with an excuse, a shrug, and a wink and say that the gospels harmonize,
because they don’t!
The contradictions are not by accident!
The Synoptic Gospels COLLIDE
with the Gospel of John!
28After this, Jesus knowing that all things were now accomplished, that the scripture might be fulfilled, saith, I thirst.29Now there was set a vessel full of vinegar: and they filled a spunge with vinegar, and put it upon hyssop, and put it to his mouth.30When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar,
he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost.
He purposefully received the vinegar
as a sign
to tell us that the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke have rendered a false Jesus Christ! That is why after He received the vinegar He said “It is finished.” He knew what they would give Him because He is the Son of God!
He also knew that many would be deceived,
giving excuses for these contradictions written about Him, and also be deceiving us!
You can’t fool God!
As I have been trying to warn my fellow Christians is that the writers of Matthew, Mark and Luke were not even there at the “Last Supper!” For sure, we know that Mark(John Mark) and Luke were followers of Paul/Saul of Tarsus. They seem to ape Matthew so I believe they are in compliance with Matthew or vice-versa and thats why they call these three gospels the Synoptic Gospels. They copy each other and when they don’t, they embellish the other. Synonymous. Alike. In agreement in order to lie about the true Jesus Christ and promote their own agenda, their new religion of Paul of Tarsus, and worship a false christ and a false god.
That is why the synoptic gospels and the gospel of John are
This is the Great Deception!
Please wake up your friends, your families, and your leaders!
Don’t allow the lies comfort.
By doing so, we AID & ABET the enemy of Jesus Christ, our Saviour!
Most people have no inkling of these discrepancies.
Please make them aware and don’t sweep it under the rug.
The Truth about God and His Son is too Important to be ignored!
The Synoptic Gospels characterize Jesus in their gospels as anti-family, anti-father and anti-responsible which presents a dilemma.
21And another of his disciples said unto him, Lord,
suffer me first to go and bury my father.
22But Jesus said unto him, Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead.
Jesus said unto him, Let the dead bury their dead: but go thou and preach the kingdom of God.
I don’t see how the true Messiah
would have so little compassion
for this disciple
as characterized by these two verses?
Compared to the Messiah in the Gospel of John and his deep love for Mary, Martha, the disciples,
because he knew their sadness and their needs
He knew He would raise Lazarus from the dead!
There are remarkable differences between the Jesus of the Synoptic Gospel
and Jesus written about in the Gospel of John!
Otherwise He could have turned to his disciples, Mary and Martha and said :
“Go preach the kingdom of God!”
But He did not do that……
Think about it!
Also, in the Old Testament I recall that we are not to drink blood,
or did God change his mind?
Obviously, at the Last Last Supper of the Synoptic Gospels after he had died but not risen,
it was wine that was offered and not blood, right?