The Image of the Beast
Lucifer is a Latin word (from the words lucem ferre), literally meaning “light-bearer”
The use of the name “Lucifer” in reference to a fallen angel stems from an interpretation of Isaiah 14:3-20, a passage that speaks of a particular Babylonian King, to whom it gives the title of “Day Star”, “Morning Star” (in Latin, lucifer),[2] as fallen or destined to fall from the heavens or sky.[3] In 2 Peter 1:19
================
True or False Apostles?
—————————–
Acts 8:1-4
1And Saul was consenting unto his death. And at that time there was a great persecution against the church which was at Jerusalem; and they were all scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles.2And devout men carried Stephen to his burial, and made great lamentation over him.3As for Saul, he made havock of the church, entering into every house, and haling men and women committed them to prison.4Therefore they that were scattered abroad went every where preaching the word.
Except the apostles?
Does that make sense at all?
Remember, in the gospel of John, when the apostles were behind closed doors right after Jesus was crucified, because they were afraid!
The question is…which apostles is Luke referring to that he says remained in Jerusalem?
Revelation 2:2
I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars:
Quite possibly it was the false apostles spoken about in Revelation 2:2 that remained in Jerusalem!
=============================
Acts 9
1And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest,2And desired of him letters to Damascus to the synagogues, that if he found any of this way, whether they were men or women, he might bring them bound unto Jerusalem.3And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven:4And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?
IF Saul was out to get the disciples…why wouldn’t he try to get them through infiltration? And why in the world would he not apprehend the apostles that remained in Jerusalem unless they were charlatans!
——————————–
Matthew 27:32
32And as they came out, they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name: him they compelled to bear his cross.
And they compel one Simon a Cyrenian, who passed by, coming out of the country, the father of Alexander and Rufus,
to bear his cross.
Paul is speaking next:
Salute Rufus chosen in the Lord, and his mother and mine.
So is Saul/Paul saying that Rufus is is his brother?
If the above is true,
that could mean that Alexander is Saul/Paul
and
the son of Simon!
And as they led him away, they laid hold upon one Simon, a Cyrenian, coming out of the country, and on him they laid the cross, that he might bear it after Jesus.
The only gospel that does not mention Simon of Cyrene is the Gospel of John.
As I have mentioned numerous times in other posts: John was very succinct about his accounts of what happened with Jesus Christ and he is the only chosen apostle to have his gospel included in the bible.
Revelation 13:13-15
13And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,14And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
————————————————————————-
Mark 12:41-43
41And Jesus sat over against the treasury, and beheld how the people cast money into the treasury: and many that were rich cast in much.42And there came a certain poor widow, and she threw in two mites, which make a farthing.43And he called unto him his disciples, and saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That this poor widow hath cast more in, than all they which have cast into the treasury:
I can just see Jesus sitting over against the treasury! GIve me a break.
And he saw also a certain poor widow casting in thither two mites.
=======================================================
I’m sure most people have heard of the Shroud of Turin and recently they have discovered two mites on each of the eyes of the images. Read last paragraph in the link below about it:
“The Shroud of Turin – Evidence of authenticity”
And more items of interest many of which were mentioned in biblical accounts such as “crucifixion nail, a Roman spear, a sponge on a stick, a crown of thorns, two scourges, a large hammer, a pair of pliers, and two desecrated Jewish phylacteries or prayer boxes.” Please read the link below:
Research by Dr. and Mrs. Whanger
There are burn holes on the shroud that form the letter “L” .
Please read the link below:
Makes me think of Lucifer….may be his signature?
The Red Stains on the Lier and Other Shroud Copies
Now there are also some letters on the Shroud of Turin: UCAI. Please read link below:
==============================================
Revelation 13:14-18
15And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.16And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:17And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.18Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
The image of the beast should both speak! Whew!
That does seem awful coincidental
that Revelation 13:15 would use the word BOTH
when referring to the image of the beast and
the Shroud of Turin is made of two images!
’2nd face’ on Shroud points to supernatural origin
Letters in Hebrew have been discovered on the Shroud of Turin.
By the way, Hebrew letters represent numbers!
http://theshroudofturin.blogspot.com/2008/11/are-three-hebrew-letters-on-shroud.html
COINCIDENCE?
The country of the Moors: a journey from Tripoli in Barbary to the … – Google Books Result
This is the Coat of Arms of Pope Benedict
Please notice the Bear and the Moor Head and the Scallop!
Moor of Freising: The Moor’s head is an heraldic charge associated with Freising, Germany.
Corbinian’s bear: A legend states that while traveling to Rome, Saint Corbinian’s pack horse was killed by a bear. He commanded the bear to carry the load. Once he arrived, he released it from his service, and it returned to Bavaria. The implication is that “Christianity tamed and domesticated the ferocity of paganism and thus laid the foundations for a great civilization in the Duchy of Bavaria.” At the same time, Corbinian’s bear, as God’s beast of burden, symbolizes the weight of office that Benedict now carries.
Scallop shell: The symbolism of the scallop shell is multiple, one of the meanings is thought to represent Saint Augustine. While a doctoral candidate in 1953, Fr. Joseph Ratzinger wrote his dissertation on The People of God and the House of God in Augustine’s Teaching is always about the Church, and therefore has a personal connection with the thought of this great Doctor of the Church.
Luke of the gospels was a physician!
’2nd face’ on Shroud points to supernatural origin
Lust For Power
Matthew 15:33-38
33And his disciples say unto him, Whence should we have so much bread in the wilderness, as to fill so great a multitude?34And Jesus saith unto them, How many loaves have ye? And they said, Seven, and a few little fishes.35And he commanded the multitude to sit down on the ground.36And he took the seven loaves and the fishes, and gave thanks, and brake them, and gave to his disciples, and the disciples to the multitude.37And they did all eat, and were filled: and they took up of the broken meat that was left seven baskets full.38And they that did eat were four thousand men, beside women and children.
I am assuming this Jesus fed the multitude with meat instead of bread,
because he is now the:
Meat of Life……………………..the Fish of Life
And
not the Bread of LIfe!
===================
First of all, this is eerily opposite of the broken bread miracle that fed 5000 men earlier in this same book of Matthew and the other gospels as well, that resulted in 12 basketfuls of fragments left over. The author of the gospel af Matthew would have us believe that this turn-around of the bread miracle is now the meat miracle.
In the gospel of John, Jesus does not brake the bread…He distributes the bread, nor does he brake the meat, but distributes the meat!
Jesus said he was the Bread of Life!
John 6:5-13
5When Jesus then lifted up his eyes, and saw a great company come unto him, he saith unto Philip, Whence shall we buy bread, that these may eat?6And this he said to prove him: for he himself knew what he would do.7Philip answered him, Two hundred pennyworth of bread is not sufficient for them, that every one of them may take a little.8One of his disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, saith unto him,9There is a lad here, which hath five barley loaves, and two small fishes: but what are they among so many?10And Jesus said, Make the men sit down. Now there was much grass in the place. So the men sat down, in number about five thousand.
11And Jesus took the loaves; and when he had given thanks, he distributed to the disciples, and the disciples to them that were set down; and likewise of the fishes as much as they would.
12When they were filled, he said unto his disciples, Gather up the fragments that remain, that nothing be lost.13Therefore they gathered them together, and filled twelve baskets with the fragments of the five barley loaves, which remained over and above unto them that had eaten.
============================
What concerns me about braking of the bread and meat in opposition to distributing the bread and the meat is what happens at the cross!
John 19:36
36For these things were done, that the scripture should be fulfilled,
A bone of him shall not be broken.
I believe that is a sign for us!
At the Last Supper in the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) the Synoptic Jesus brakes the bread also. In the Gospel of John there is no braking of bread.
The braking of bread may have more to do with tradition
than with what really happened at the Last Supper!
It is obvious that the Synoptic Gospel writers were not witnesses to the true Supper with Jesus the night before he died and have written a false account of the Last Supper in opposition to the Gospel of John! And I believe the same opposition to the feeding of the 5000 in the Gospel of John.
It is apparent that the three Synoptic Gospels are written to oppose everything written in the Gospel of John. Why? So that you won’t believe in the true Jesus and instead believe their version of Jesus even though it is obvious they were not his disciples, to cause confusion, to contradict, to mock, to steal the truth and make it a lie!
The Synoptic Gospel writers wanted their TRADITION and preferred it to
the true Messiah
because TRADITION is their bread and butter!
The Covenant with Many
———————–
In the Old Testament the Hebrews were kept alive in the desert for 40 years after their escape from the Egyptians via the parting of the Red Sea and many confrontations with the Egyptian Pharoah. Part of that time in the desert God would rain from heaven manna for the Hebrews to collect and eat and it filled them. It was a miracle. But God instructed them not to collect more than was needed per day because it would not last. The manna would rot. They were also instructed to collect twice as much manna on the day before the Sabbath which was the 6th day. So instead they would collect twice as much the day before the Sabbath. The extra manna collected on the 6th day would not rot which was intended to eat on the Sabbath, the 7th day, the day of rest. That was so that the Hebrews would honor the Sabbath (7th day thereby honoring the true God). Eventually some of the Hebrews started complaining (even though God had freed them from the abuse and slavery by the Egyptians) They wanted meat, instead of manna –so God gave them meat and it was not a good result according to Numbers There is another version however in Deuteronomy, I think:
Numbers 11:31
31And there went forth a wind from the LORD, and brought quails from the sea, and let them fall by the camp, as it were a day’s journey on this side, and as it were a day’s journey on the other side, round about the camp, and as it were two cubits high upon the face of the earth.
I believe Numbers 11:31 is referring to Pentacost which is written in the book of Acts!
Numbers 11:32-34
32And the people stood up all that day, and all that night, and all the next day, and they gathered the quails: he that gathered least gathered ten homers: and they spread them all abroad for themselves round about the camp.33And while the flesh was yet between their teeth, ere it was chewed, the wrath of the LORD was kindled against the people, and the LORD smote the people with a very great plague.34And he called the name of that place Kibrothhattaavah: because there they buried the people that lusted.
I believe this is a prophetic warning for then and for the future! It has to do with the Lust For Power!
The Pope Calls For World Government With Real Teeth!
Could a “very great plague” be what is occurring in the news about Roman Catholic Abuses?
I think the reason for the manna God provided is more than just honoring the Sabbath, or feeding the Hebrews in the desert, or God’s laws, yet that is obviously detrimentally important! But this story was to warn us of the corrupted version of Jesus Christ as in the above made up miracle of the fish in the Gospel of Matthew and repeated in the synoptic gospels.
This meat miracle of the 4000 is not in the gospel of John!
And another interesting coincidence about the 4000 is in the Book of Acts :
37And as Paul was to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, May I speak unto thee? Who said, Canst thou speak Greek?
38Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?
39But Paul said, I am a man which am a Jew of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people.
To honor God is to honor His Son. To honor Jesus Christ is to believe in Him and His Father who He considered to be more important than Himself and to honor the laws God made for us. It isn’t just to arbitrarily obey some strange law of the Sabbath and the other 9 laws but to protect us from the evil one.
It is for our welfare that he made the Ten Commandments.
The Roman Catholic Church replaced the Sabbath with Sunday worship to honor another god – The sun god…the fish god.
The laws of God were to distinguish the one true God and the one true Son of God from another god and another sun of another god.
Jesus said that His meat was to do the will of God when He met the woman at the well in Samaria with his disciples. This is the same place that the synoptic gospels say Jesus instructed the disciples not to enter into Samaria even though He really did go with his disciples in the gospel of John.
The feeding of the 4000 men in the wilderness with meat and 7 basketfuls left over broken meat….instead of the 5000 men with the bread with the 12 basketfuls of fragments of bread is a mockery of this particular miracle and a clue as to who is the true Jesus Christ!
Another interesting piece of evidence is that if the above verses in Matthew about the meat miracle is true and the disciples had seen the bread miracle previously in chapter 14 of the gospel of Matthew where Jesus fed 5000 men why would this particular meat miracle surprise them that Jesus could do this. The disciples act totally brainless. Why do they act so bewildered if they had seen the miracle of the feeding of the 5000 men which happened in all of the gospels? It does not make sense and is obviously included to confuse and deceive!!!!!
Another fact is this miracle of the meat is not in the Gospel of John!
The synoptic gospels are rendering a false perception of the Son of God. They are offering us meat….fish…..the fish god …..a false god…..a lawless god that does not honor the 7th day (the Sabbath) as instructed by God in the Ten Commandments that being the 4th commandment which has been annihilated by Roman Catholicism and most of her daughters that go along!
The Roman Catholic church also annihilated the commandment about idolatry. I’m sure it was a business decision so that they could make lots of money selling icons, and crosses, and fish objects, statues of Mary, statues of saints which number in the thousands by now, one for everything imaginable.
Now this business conglomeration is trying to get you and I to honor the Shroud of Turin which is a linen cloth picture they claim is Jesus Christ yet they don’t even worship the true Jesus Christ, or the true God or His laws, so how would they know?
Someone has definitely tampered with scripture and mixed it up (sifted) and included a lot of lies! Why? Because of what happened in Egypt with the Hebrews and because of the true Jesus Christ overcoming the world!
These lies are retribution from total evil to confuse us (you and I) as to who is the real Messiah, the Son of God and who God is Himself!
It is like we are dealing with an imposter of Jesus Christ in reality or in written form as to replace reality with fiction to debunk the true Jesus Christ and His Father!
A Desert Place (a Different View)
How is it That Ye Do Not Understand?
The Synoptic “Q Source”
Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)
Abomination of Desolation
Abomination of Desolation Pt 2
