The Mother of Jesus Christ: SHALOM!
Matthew 27:55-56
55And many women were there beholding afar off, which followed Jesus from Galilee, ministering unto him:56Among which was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James and Joses, and the mother of Zebedees children.
The mother of Jesus is not mentioned!
Mark 15:40-41
40There were also women looking on afar off: among whom was Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James the less and of Joses, and Salome;41(Who also, when he was in Galilee, followed him, and ministered unto him;) and many other women which came up with him unto Jerusalem.
Again, the mother of Jesus is not mentioned!
Luke 23:49
49And all his acquaintance, and the women that followed him from Galilee, stood afar off, beholding these things.
And again,
the mother of Jesus is not mentioned!
===============================================================
The Synoptic gospels of Matthew, Mark and Luke
do not mention
the mother of Jesus,
as if they don’t know who she is!
================================
IN THE SYNOPTIC GOSPELS (MATTHEW, MARK, AND LUKE)
ALL OF THE WOMEN THAT MINISTERED TO JESUS
WERE STANDING AFAR OFF!
Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother, and his mother‘s sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, andMary Magdalene.
The gospel of John differs in that the few women that stood by are
near the cross!
(Close enough for Jesus to talk to his mother
and to the disciple called John.)
The disciple who wrote the gospel of John
also seems
to know the mother of Jesus!
Only in the Gospel of John is the mother of Jesus mentioned!
WHY?
BECAUSE JOHN KNEW HER!
IF you take a sentence and take out punctuation- it changes the meaning of a sentence. Punctuation was added later to the bible.
IN the verse above (John 19:25) there are four women standing by the cross of Jesus.
In the verse below (John 19:25) there are only three women.
All I did was take out the commas!
By doing this it makes more sense!
Instead of two sisters called by the same name “Mary” there is only one.
I don’t know about you, but I have never known anyone who was called by the same name as their sister. Not even twins!
It is stupid to assume that two sisters are called by the same name!
==========================================
Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother and his mother‘s sister Mary the wife of Cleophas and Mary Magdalene.
IN my opinion, the ands in the sentence seem to separate the people.
Since they did not use commas back then, it would make sense to separate the people with a conjunction like “and”.
If John the disciple wanted us to know that the name of Jesus’s mother was Mary then he would have written that sentence like this:
Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother Mary and his mother’s sister Mary the wife of Cleophas and Mary Magdalene.
or
Now there stood by the cross of Jesus Mary his mother and his mother’s sister Mary the wife of Cleophas and Mary Magdalene.
Otherwise we MIGHT AS WELL say that Jesus’s mother is Mary Magdalene IF we can say that she is called Mary as well as her sister who is Mary!
IT IS RIDICULOUS!
but instead he writes:
Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother and his mother‘s sister Mary the wife of Cleophas and Mary Magdalene.
==================================================
Now if you compare the verses in the synoptic with John you have three women named in each verse.
but you have some different names given to these women.
Matthew
Mary Magdalene,
and Mary the mother of James and Joses
and the mother of Zebedees children
Mark
Mary Magdalene,
and Mary the mother of James the less and of Joses,
and Salome
John
his mother
and his mother‘s sister Mary the wife of Cleophas
and Mary Magdalene.
==================================================
WORD ARITHMETIC
===================================================
IF you take out the obvious match you would take out Mary Magdalene since all three gospels agree that she was there!
So lets do that!
Matthew
and Mary the mother of James and Joses
and the mother of Zebedees children
Mark
and Mary the mother of James the less and of Joses,
and Salome
John
his mother
and his mother‘s sister Mary the wife of Cleophas
Now, if you take out the obvious match out of these verses, you would take out Mary the mother of James and Joses and it’s corresponding matches!
So lets do that!
Matthew
and the mother of Zebedees children
Mark
and Salome
John
his mother
==================================================
SO the left over names are:
1) the mother of Zebedees children
2) Salome
3) his mother
Is there a match we can make?
===============================================================
John 19:26-27
26When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son!27Then saith he to the disciple, Behold thy mother! And from that hour that disciple took her unto his own home.
============================================================
Definitions of the leftover names above!
Zebedee
noun - BIBLE father of the disciples James and John: Matt. 4:21
Origin: LL(Ec) Zebedaeus < Gr(Ec) Zebedaios, prob. < Heb zevadya, lit.,
God has bestowed < zavad, to donate, bestow + ya, God
Salome - Meaning of the name
is of Hebrew origin, and its meaning is “peace“.
Possibly from the same root as the greeting “Shalom”.
===================================================
I believe that Salome who is the mother of Zebedee’s children could be the mother of Jesus!
Who did Jesus entrust his mother to when he died?
To the disciple standing by that wrote the gospel of John!
The author of the gospel of John never did call Jesus’s mother by the name of Mary!
SO if you trust Luke and Mark (John Mark) who were followers of Saul/Paul/Aul whose mother is called Mary who bestowed much labour on them, then believe them.
Romans 16:6
6Greet Mary, who bestowed much labour on us.
I don’t believe them!
They have proved to me their untrustworthiness
as I have written about numerous times in my posts!
The synoptic gospels can’t even get in order the events,
or name the people involved,
and they embellish the events with their own imaginations,
make up i.e. lie about what Jesus said and did,
therefore they do not deserve to be given that trust!
We have all been brought up to believe that the mother of Jesus is named Mary, but the evidence THAT I TRUST leads me to a different conclusion!
ANOTHER REASON I DON’T THINK MARY IS THE MOTHER OF JESUS IS BECAUSE JESUS NEVER CALLED HIS MOTHER MARY!
JESUS CALLED His mother WOMAN!
Shalom!
————————–
John 1:5
5And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.
Revelation 12
_________________________________________________________________
Here are some interesting articles
Please read:
The ‘Brothers and Sisters’ of Jesus
Did the Virgin Mary and Joseph have any other children besides Jesus?
“Brethren of the Lord”
The Synoptic gospels are FULL of errors and contradictions within themselves and lack any true credibility.
We are supposed to accept that Jesus’s mother is called Mary and has a sister named Mary so that Roman Catholicism can venerate (worship) some strange woman they have named Mary and made into a Goddess
and call her the Mother of God!
POPE URGES GIVING PRIORITY TO MARY
IT IS ABSOLUTELY the ANTI-CHRIST!
Interesting article:
Mary The Mother of Jesus, Who Was She?
The Image of the Beast
Lucifer is a Latin word (from the words lucem ferre), literally meaning “light-bearer”
The use of the name “Lucifer” in reference to a fallen angel stems from an interpretation of Isaiah 14:3-20, a passage that speaks of a particular Babylonian King, to whom it gives the title of “Day Star”, “Morning Star” (in Latin, lucifer),[2] as fallen or destined to fall from the heavens or sky.[3] In 2 Peter 1:19
================
True or False Apostles?
—————————–
Acts 8:1-4
1And Saul was consenting unto his death. And at that time there was a great persecution against the church which was at Jerusalem; and they were all scattered abroad throughout the regions of Judaea and Samaria, except the apostles.2And devout men carried Stephen to his burial, and made great lamentation over him.3As for Saul, he made havock of the church, entering into every house, and haling men and women committed them to prison.4Therefore they that were scattered abroad went every where preaching the word.
Except the apostles?
Does that make sense at all?
Remember, in the gospel of John, when the apostles were behind closed doors right after Jesus was crucified, because they were afraid!
The question is…which apostles is Luke referring to that he says remained in Jerusalem?
Revelation 2:2
I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how thou canst not bear them which are evil: and thou hast tried them which say they are apostles, and are not, and hast found them liars:
Quite possibly it was the false apostles spoken about in Revelation 2:2 that remained in Jerusalem!
=============================
Acts 9
1And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high priest,2And desired of him letters to Damascus to the synagogues, that if he found any of this way, whether they were men or women, he might bring them bound unto Jerusalem.3And as he journeyed, he came near Damascus: and suddenly there shined round about him a light from heaven:4And he fell to the earth, and heard a voice saying unto him, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?
IF Saul was out to get the disciples…why wouldn’t he try to get them through infiltration? And why in the world would he not apprehend the apostles that remained in Jerusalem unless they were charlatans!
——————————–
Matthew 27:32
32And as they came out, they found a man of Cyrene, Simon by name: him they compelled to bear his cross.
And they compel one Simon a Cyrenian, who passed by, coming out of the country, the father of Alexander and Rufus,
to bear his cross.
Paul is speaking next:
Salute Rufus chosen in the Lord, and his mother and mine.
So is Saul/Paul saying that Rufus is is his brother?
If the above is true,
that could mean that Alexander is Saul/Paul
and
the son of Simon!
And as they led him away, they laid hold upon one Simon, a Cyrenian, coming out of the country, and on him they laid the cross, that he might bear it after Jesus.
The only gospel that does not mention Simon of Cyrene is the Gospel of John.
As I have mentioned numerous times in other posts: John was very succinct about his accounts of what happened with Jesus Christ and he is the only chosen apostle to have his gospel included in the bible.
Revelation 13:13-15
13And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,14And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.
————————————————————————-
Mark 12:41-43
41And Jesus sat over against the treasury, and beheld how the people cast money into the treasury: and many that were rich cast in much.42And there came a certain poor widow, and she threw in two mites, which make a farthing.43And he called unto him his disciples, and saith unto them, Verily I say unto you, That this poor widow hath cast more in, than all they which have cast into the treasury:
I can just see Jesus sitting over against the treasury! GIve me a break.
And he saw also a certain poor widow casting in thither two mites.
=======================================================
I’m sure most people have heard of the Shroud of Turin and recently they have discovered two mites on each of the eyes of the images. Read last paragraph in the link below about it:
“The Shroud of Turin – Evidence of authenticity”
And more items of interest many of which were mentioned in biblical accounts such as “crucifixion nail, a Roman spear, a sponge on a stick, a crown of thorns, two scourges, a large hammer, a pair of pliers, and two desecrated Jewish phylacteries or prayer boxes.” Please read the link below:
Research by Dr. and Mrs. Whanger
There are burn holes on the shroud that form the letter “L” .
Please read the link below:
Makes me think of Lucifer….may be his signature?
The Red Stains on the Lier and Other Shroud Copies
Now there are also some letters on the Shroud of Turin: UCAI. Please read link below:
==============================================
Revelation 13:14-18
15And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed.16And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:17And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.18Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
The image of the beast should both speak! Whew!
That does seem awful coincidental
that Revelation 13:15 would use the word BOTH
when referring to the image of the beast and
the Shroud of Turin is made of two images!
’2nd face’ on Shroud points to supernatural origin
Letters in Hebrew have been discovered on the Shroud of Turin.
By the way, Hebrew letters represent numbers!
http://theshroudofturin.blogspot.com/2008/11/are-three-hebrew-letters-on-shroud.html
COINCIDENCE?
The country of the Moors: a journey from Tripoli in Barbary to the … – Google Books Result
This is the Coat of Arms of Pope Benedict
Please notice the Bear and the Moor Head and the Scallop!
Moor of Freising: The Moor’s head is an heraldic charge associated with Freising, Germany.
Corbinian’s bear: A legend states that while traveling to Rome, Saint Corbinian’s pack horse was killed by a bear. He commanded the bear to carry the load. Once he arrived, he released it from his service, and it returned to Bavaria. The implication is that “Christianity tamed and domesticated the ferocity of paganism and thus laid the foundations for a great civilization in the Duchy of Bavaria.” At the same time, Corbinian’s bear, as God’s beast of burden, symbolizes the weight of office that Benedict now carries.
Scallop shell: The symbolism of the scallop shell is multiple, one of the meanings is thought to represent Saint Augustine. While a doctoral candidate in 1953, Fr. Joseph Ratzinger wrote his dissertation on The People of God and the House of God in Augustine’s Teaching is always about the Church, and therefore has a personal connection with the thought of this great Doctor of the Church.
Luke of the gospels was a physician!
’2nd face’ on Shroud points to supernatural origin
Lust For Power
Matthew 15:33-38
33And his disciples say unto him, Whence should we have so much bread in the wilderness, as to fill so great a multitude?34And Jesus saith unto them, How many loaves have ye? And they said, Seven, and a few little fishes.35And he commanded the multitude to sit down on the ground.36And he took the seven loaves and the fishes, and gave thanks, and brake them, and gave to his disciples, and the disciples to the multitude.37And they did all eat, and were filled: and they took up of the broken meat that was left seven baskets full.38And they that did eat were four thousand men, beside women and children.
I am assuming this Jesus fed the multitude with meat instead of bread,
because he is now the:
Meat of Life……………………..the Fish of Life
And
not the Bread of LIfe!
===================
First of all, this is eerily opposite of the broken bread miracle that fed 5000 men earlier in this same book of Matthew and the other gospels as well, that resulted in 12 basketfuls of fragments left over. The author of the gospel af Matthew would have us believe that this turn-around of the bread miracle is now the meat miracle.
In the gospel of John, Jesus does not brake the bread…He distributes the bread, nor does he brake the meat, but distributes the meat!
Jesus said he was the Bread of Life!
John 6:5-13
5When Jesus then lifted up his eyes, and saw a great company come unto him, he saith unto Philip, Whence shall we buy bread, that these may eat?6And this he said to prove him: for he himself knew what he would do.7Philip answered him, Two hundred pennyworth of bread is not sufficient for them, that every one of them may take a little.8One of his disciples, Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother, saith unto him,9There is a lad here, which hath five barley loaves, and two small fishes: but what are they among so many?10And Jesus said, Make the men sit down. Now there was much grass in the place. So the men sat down, in number about five thousand.
11And Jesus took the loaves; and when he had given thanks, he distributed to the disciples, and the disciples to them that were set down; and likewise of the fishes as much as they would.
12When they were filled, he said unto his disciples, Gather up the fragments that remain, that nothing be lost.13Therefore they gathered them together, and filled twelve baskets with the fragments of the five barley loaves, which remained over and above unto them that had eaten.
============================
What concerns me about braking of the bread and meat in opposition to distributing the bread and the meat is what happens at the cross!
John 19:36
36For these things were done, that the scripture should be fulfilled,
A bone of him shall not be broken.
I believe that is a sign for us!
At the Last Supper in the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, and Luke) the Synoptic Jesus brakes the bread also. In the Gospel of John there is no braking of bread.
The braking of bread may have more to do with tradition
than with what really happened at the Last Supper!
It is obvious that the Synoptic Gospel writers were not witnesses to the true Supper with Jesus the night before he died and have written a false account of the Last Supper in opposition to the Gospel of John! And I believe the same opposition to the feeding of the 5000 in the Gospel of John.
It is apparent that the three Synoptic Gospels are written to oppose everything written in the Gospel of John. Why? So that you won’t believe in the true Jesus and instead believe their version of Jesus even though it is obvious they were not his disciples, to cause confusion, to contradict, to mock, to steal the truth and make it a lie!
The Synoptic Gospel writers wanted their TRADITION and preferred it to
the true Messiah
because TRADITION is their bread and butter!
The Covenant with Many
———————–
In the Old Testament the Hebrews were kept alive in the desert for 40 years after their escape from the Egyptians via the parting of the Red Sea and many confrontations with the Egyptian Pharoah. Part of that time in the desert God would rain from heaven manna for the Hebrews to collect and eat and it filled them. It was a miracle. But God instructed them not to collect more than was needed per day because it would not last. The manna would rot. They were also instructed to collect twice as much manna on the day before the Sabbath which was the 6th day. So instead they would collect twice as much the day before the Sabbath. The extra manna collected on the 6th day would not rot which was intended to eat on the Sabbath, the 7th day, the day of rest. That was so that the Hebrews would honor the Sabbath (7th day thereby honoring the true God). Eventually some of the Hebrews started complaining (even though God had freed them from the abuse and slavery by the Egyptians) They wanted meat, instead of manna –so God gave them meat and it was not a good result according to Numbers There is another version however in Deuteronomy, I think:
Numbers 11:31
31And there went forth a wind from the LORD, and brought quails from the sea, and let them fall by the camp, as it were a day’s journey on this side, and as it were a day’s journey on the other side, round about the camp, and as it were two cubits high upon the face of the earth.
I believe Numbers 11:31 is referring to Pentacost which is written in the book of Acts!
Numbers 11:32-34
32And the people stood up all that day, and all that night, and all the next day, and they gathered the quails: he that gathered least gathered ten homers: and they spread them all abroad for themselves round about the camp.33And while the flesh was yet between their teeth, ere it was chewed, the wrath of the LORD was kindled against the people, and the LORD smote the people with a very great plague.34And he called the name of that place Kibrothhattaavah: because there they buried the people that lusted.
I believe this is a prophetic warning for then and for the future! It has to do with the Lust For Power!
The Pope Calls For World Government With Real Teeth!
Could a “very great plague” be what is occurring in the news about Roman Catholic Abuses?
I think the reason for the manna God provided is more than just honoring the Sabbath, or feeding the Hebrews in the desert, or God’s laws, yet that is obviously detrimentally important! But this story was to warn us of the corrupted version of Jesus Christ as in the above made up miracle of the fish in the Gospel of Matthew and repeated in the synoptic gospels.
This meat miracle of the 4000 is not in the gospel of John!
And another interesting coincidence about the 4000 is in the Book of Acts :
37And as Paul was to be led into the castle, he said unto the chief captain, May I speak unto thee? Who said, Canst thou speak Greek?
38Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?
39But Paul said, I am a man which am a Jew of Tarsus, a city in Cilicia, a citizen of no mean city: and, I beseech thee, suffer me to speak unto the people.
To honor God is to honor His Son. To honor Jesus Christ is to believe in Him and His Father who He considered to be more important than Himself and to honor the laws God made for us. It isn’t just to arbitrarily obey some strange law of the Sabbath and the other 9 laws but to protect us from the evil one.
It is for our welfare that he made the Ten Commandments.
The Roman Catholic Church replaced the Sabbath with Sunday worship to honor another god – The sun god…the fish god.
The laws of God were to distinguish the one true God and the one true Son of God from another god and another sun of another god.
Jesus said that His meat was to do the will of God when He met the woman at the well in Samaria with his disciples. This is the same place that the synoptic gospels say Jesus instructed the disciples not to enter into Samaria even though He really did go with his disciples in the gospel of John.
The feeding of the 4000 men in the wilderness with meat and 7 basketfuls left over broken meat….instead of the 5000 men with the bread with the 12 basketfuls of fragments of bread is a mockery of this particular miracle and a clue as to who is the true Jesus Christ!
Another interesting piece of evidence is that if the above verses in Matthew about the meat miracle is true and the disciples had seen the bread miracle previously in chapter 14 of the gospel of Matthew where Jesus fed 5000 men why would this particular meat miracle surprise them that Jesus could do this. The disciples act totally brainless. Why do they act so bewildered if they had seen the miracle of the feeding of the 5000 men which happened in all of the gospels? It does not make sense and is obviously included to confuse and deceive!!!!!
Another fact is this miracle of the meat is not in the Gospel of John!
The synoptic gospels are rendering a false perception of the Son of God. They are offering us meat….fish…..the fish god …..a false god…..a lawless god that does not honor the 7th day (the Sabbath) as instructed by God in the Ten Commandments that being the 4th commandment which has been annihilated by Roman Catholicism and most of her daughters that go along!
The Roman Catholic church also annihilated the commandment about idolatry. I’m sure it was a business decision so that they could make lots of money selling icons, and crosses, and fish objects, statues of Mary, statues of saints which number in the thousands by now, one for everything imaginable.
Now this business conglomeration is trying to get you and I to honor the Shroud of Turin which is a linen cloth picture they claim is Jesus Christ yet they don’t even worship the true Jesus Christ, or the true God or His laws, so how would they know?
Someone has definitely tampered with scripture and mixed it up (sifted) and included a lot of lies! Why? Because of what happened in Egypt with the Hebrews and because of the true Jesus Christ overcoming the world!
These lies are retribution from total evil to confuse us (you and I) as to who is the real Messiah, the Son of God and who God is Himself!
It is like we are dealing with an imposter of Jesus Christ in reality or in written form as to replace reality with fiction to debunk the true Jesus Christ and His Father!
A Desert Place (a Different View)
How is it That Ye Do Not Understand?
The Synoptic “Q Source”
Joseph of Arimathea (A JUST MAN)
Abomination of Desolation
Abomination of Desolation Pt 2
Keys of the Kingdom of Heaven
Matthew 16
13When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?14And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.
MARK 8
27And Jesus went out, and his disciples, into the towns of Caesarea Philippi: and by the way he asked his disciples, saying unto them, Whom do men say that I am?28And they answered, John the Baptist; but some say, Elias; and others, One of the prophets
Why would Jesus Christ, the Son of God, ask
Whom do men say that I the Son of man am? or Whom do men say that I am?
If He is the Son of God, wouldn’t He know who he was?
Just kidding.
Wouldn’t he know what they were saying about Him?
The true Jesus Christ, the Son of God, was well aware of what people
were thinking and saying who He was!
=============================================================
Matthew 16:15-17
15He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
16And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.
17And Jesus answered and said unto him,
Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee,
but my Father which is in heaven.
Mark 8:29
29And he saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
And Peter answereth and saith unto him,
Thou art the Christ.
Matthew 16:17-20
18And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.19And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
20Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.
This Synoptic Jesus tells Peter who he is……as if he did not know.
Peter just told Jesus who he was, but now Jesus is telling Peter who he is!
He had just miraculously fed 4000 people out of a pittance of food earlier
and he did not want his disciples to tell anyone who he was?
Why were those 4000 people hanging out with him fasting for 3 days
that he fed with a few fishes and a few loaves of bread?
Did the 4000 men not know who they were either?
This is utter nonsense!
This is an attempt to build a church on Peter’s name.
The True Messiah knows who he is
and what people were thinking
and even what would happen in the future!
If he didn’t know who he was then how in the world would he expect us to figure it out?
Matthew 21-23
21From that time forth began Jesus to shew unto his disciples, how that he must go unto Jerusalem, and suffer many things of the elders and chief priests and scribes, and be killed, and be raised again the third day.22Then Peter took him, and began to rebuke him, saying, Be it far from thee, Lord: this shall not be unto thee.23But he turned, and said unto Peter,
Get thee behind me, Satan: thou art an offence unto me:
for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men.
Mark 8:30-33
30And he charged them that they should tell no man of him.31And he began to teach them, that the Son of man must suffer many things, and be rejected of the elders, and of the chief priests, and scribes, and be killed, and after three days rise again.32And he spake that saying openly. And Peter took him, and began to rebuke him.33But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples,
he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan:
for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men.
HUGE CONTRADICTION!
The Gospel of Matthew 6:17 above has Jesus BLESSING Peter and giving Peter the keys to the kingdom
and then tells him that he is the rock which the church will be built upon
and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it
and within a short time (like within the same conversation) Matthew 6:23
Jesus REBUKES Peter
and says that Peter is SATAN!
Not only does he say he is Satan, but also an offense to him!
What happened to the gates of hell not prevailing against the church?
It lasted a whole minute!
This is like a Japanese Monster movie dubbed in English
out of sync!
=======================================
At the Last Supper,
after Jesus and his apostles had eaten,
He talks to his disciples about who He is and explains Himself to them
and what is going to happen to Him and to them
in the Gospel of John!
Please read!
John 14
John 15
John 16
After he had risen from the grave and visited them
he gives them the HOLY GHOST!
JOHN 20:21-23
21Then said Jesus to them again,
Peace be unto you: as my Father hath sent me, even so send I you.
22And when he had said this, he breathed on them,
and saith unto them, Receive ye the Holy Ghost:
23Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them;
and whose soever sins ye retain, they are retained.
NO CLOVEN TONGUES OF FIRE!
NO SPEAKING IN TONGUES!
NO MIGHTY WIND!
OBVIOUSLY, JESUS DID NOT GIVE THE KEYS of the KINGDOM TO PETER !!!
There are no keys!
THAT IS PROPAGANDA!
THE GOSPEL OF MATTHEW AND MARK
HAVE TURNED THE TRUTH UPSIDE DOWN!
They have managed to make Jesus sound like a lunatic,
which is typical for the Synoptic Jesus!
The Absurdity of Cloven Tongues, Mighty Winds and Proselytes
=================================================
I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *
I AM THAT I AM (Part two)
The Stone Which the Builders Rejected
The Synoptic “Q Source”
Salute No Man
The Fruits of the Vatican
The Fig Tree – Blessed are the Barren
Matthew 21:18-20
18Now in the morning as he returned into the city, he hungered.19And when he saw a fig tree in the way, he came to it, and found nothing thereon, but leaves only, and said unto it, Let no fruit grow on thee henceforward for ever. And presently the fig tree withered away.20And when the disciples saw it, they marvelled, saying, How soon is the fig tree withered away!21Jesus answered and said unto them, Verily I say unto you, If ye have faith, and doubt not, ye shall not only do this which is done to the fig tree, but also if ye shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; it shall be done.22And all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive.
This rendition of Jesus Christ in the gospel of Matthew ie the Synoptic Jesus
is having a hissy fit,
and not only that, he was talking to a fig tree
AND IF THAT ISN’T BAD ENOUGH
SUPPOSEDLY HE HAD A REASON
FOR THIS MADNESS
because it had not produced fruit for him to eat
as he expected because he was hungry that particular morning.
========
If Jesus can feed 5000 men with a few loaves of bread,
why could he not make the fig tree produce fruit for him presently?
========
IF Jesus Christ, the Son of God,
knows what happens 2000 years in advance,
you would think he would know that that fig tree did not have fruit on it before he hoped to eat figs from it that morning.
==========
WHY WOULD THE disciples marvel at the withering fig tree?
Like I said, if it were cursed by Jesus wouldn’t they expect it to die?
But, of course, this is rubbish!
Why would the disciples want to have faith enough to curse a fig tree?
It is stupid!
IT makes Jesus look insane and his followers look like stupid idiots,
but very Synoptic!
I’m surprised that this SYNOPTIC Jesus Christ didn’t
charge the fig tree to tell no man!
But he does eventually because he is Synoptic!
Please read about the Synoptic Source or rather the SS!
The Synoptic “Q Source”
Mark 11:12-14
12 And on the morrow, when they were come from Bethany, he was hungry:13And seeing a fig tree afar off having leaves, he came, if haply he might find any thing thereon: and when he came to it, he found nothing but leaves; for the time of figs was not yet.14And Jesus answered and said unto it, No man eat fruit of thee hereafter for ever. And his disciples heard it.
He comes haply?
Sounds like he was skipping with flowers in his hair.
What did the Synoptic Jesus expect,
if the time of figs was not yet?
Obviously, the fig tree was not ready to bear its fruit!
DUH
IF only Simon of Cyrene had been there!
This is mocking Jesus in the gospel of John when he says his time is not yet!
John 7:6
6Then Jesus said unto them, My time is not yet come: but your time is alway ready.
Jesus Christ did not go around cursing trees!
Jesus Christ had just raised Lazarus who had been dead for four days.
The Jesus that is propagandized in the Synoptic gospels
cursing the fig tree is
FALSE
and may I add…….
INANE!
Why in the world would Jesus Christ, the Son of God, waste his time cursing a fig tree?
IN between these verses in the gospel of Mark, Jesus Christ overturns the tables of the money changers in the temple, but actuality Jesus overturned the tables at an earlier time in the Gospel of John soon after the wedding in Cana.
The Synoptics do not include the wedding in Cana, because the Synoptic authors were not there!
I suppose that is what the fig tree curse mock is all about….
the Synoptic Author was jealous that he was not chosen!
————————-
The Synoptic writers go to the extreme to make Jesus Christ look like a weirdo,
because He was upset with the money changers
and the degradation of the place of worship
The Temple!
The reason for their extreme ridicule is because
they were the money changers in the place of worship
and they had turned it into a marketplace!
The Synoptic gospels are trying to confuse events and add their inane teaching
to fill-in space because they are full of air
where the true teaching and true miracles are discarded
and replaced with their
guile!
Please read:
Chief Priests and the Legion
Mark 11:19-22
19And when even was come, he went out of the city.20And in the morning, as they passed by, they saw the fig tree dried up from the roots.21And Peter calling to remembrance saith unto him, Master, behold, the fig tree which thou cursedst is withered away.22And Jesus answering saith unto them, Have faith in God.23For verily I say unto you, That whosoever shall say unto this mountain, Be thou removed, and be thou cast into the sea; and shall not doubt in his heart, but shall believe that those things which he saith shall come to pass; he shall have whatsoever he saith.
Here the author of the gospel of Mark is also mocking Peter “calling into remembrance“.
He calls into remembrance the fig tree that was cursed
moments before as in the gospel of Matthew
and a day later in the gospel of Mark.
(Wee Contradiction)
Which is similar to the contradiction between the
Last Supper in the gospel of John and the Last Supper in the Synoptic Gospels
which are on two different days.
The Covenant with Many
CONFIRMATION OF THE COVENANT
Then Jesus tells Peter to have faith in God because the tree that was cursed is withered away.
This is utterly ridiculous!
(I CERTAINLY WILL NOT HAVE FAITH BECAUSE OF A FIG TREE !!!!!)
and THIS INANE TEACHING OF THE SYNOPTIC AUTHOR OF THE SYNOPTIC JESUS
has a great deal to do with
REPLACEMENT THEOLOGY!
NOT ONLY IS THIS RIDICULOUS
BUT AN INSULT TO
YOU!
Here is a site on the internet I found explaining the fig tree curse/miracle. It is at Christian Courier.com, “a place for reasonable faith” and here is their explanation for what occurred,
but not really.
Why Did Jesus “Curse” the Fig Tree?
In this study he argues that the tree was probably not on someone’s property so therefore Jesus had the right to pronounce judgement upon a free fig tree. I guess that has been an objection to some, whether Jesus had the right to kill a tree. hmmmmmm. Then in number four of this study, he says that Jesus did not perceive that the tree only had leaves from afar even though Jesus is a deity and was expecting some fruit. His explanation for Jesus not being “on the ball” was that Jesus was not always in a deity-mode, sometimes Jesus was lazy and did not use his deity-ism. Because there was no fruit under the leaves that he did not see, he cursed the fig tree. By the way, this person is one of many that write and educate the masses justifying these non-events because they are not willing to discern and come to grips with the fact that some of the gospel is not true. They also hate Israel and this writer thinks God is done with Israel and he is so far off the track. They also have been trained since their birth to believe that the bible is INERRANT. Kind of like how they teach that the Pope is infallible. They have been trained not to question scripture, because they have been taught/brainwashed (as most of us have) and are just passing it on. It is deception and because someone tags the name of Jesus Christ to the insanity included in the bible and their own propaganda against Israel they will justify IT any witch way.
So, Jesus Christ used this curse of the fig tree as an object lesson for his disciples.
What in the world did they learn?
They learned that you can remove a mountain with your faith
somehow demonstrated through the cursing of a fig tree.
What about the mustard seed?
This is what is called “mocking a mountain out of a MOLE HILL.”
This is UNREASONABLE FAITH!
It is not in the Gospel of John, because it did not happen!
Jesus did not come to curse a fig tree!
===========================
Basically, the moral to this ridiculous non-event is to replace the fig tree
with the mustard tree
symbolically!
The deceiver came to curse, to ridicule, and to sow confusion, discord and deception.
IT IS A DUMB STORY!
========================================================
I believe this dichotomy has to do with Nathanael under the fig tree
and that Jesus called Nathanael “a true Israelite
in whom there is no guile.”
However, Luke’s rendition of Jesus Christ does!
Luke 23:29-31
29For, behold, the days are coming, in the which they shall say, Blessed are the barren, and the wombs that never bare, and the paps which never gave suck.
s30Then shall they begin to say to the mountains, Fall on us; and to the hills, Cover us.
31For if they do these things in a green tree, what shall be done in the dry?
I DON’T KNOW……DO TELL!
Oh yea. Luke knows because he was there when they did it ……INDEED!
THEY PROBABLY ALL WILL JOIN WITH ROME TO FORM A UNIVERSAL RELIGION ….NOT TO OFFEND ANYONE….
AS LONG AS IT IS HEADED BY ROME!
THE MOTHER HEN
WHO WITH HER INFIL–TRAITORS MAKES MEN
COWAR
DDDDDDUUUUHHHHS
Besides isn’t cursing a tree ….a spell? A trick. Cursing is Paul’s business! Paul does so in the books of the bible that promote him. In fact, it is Paul who catches men in their guile by being crafty:
2 Corinthians 12:16
But be it so, I did not burden you: nevertheless, being crafty, I caught you with guile.
Please view this you tube:
A New Pope
The Fruits of the Vatican
===============================================
I Am That I Am (The Sign) -Revised *
(If you like these articles there are many more at Homepage and New and Revised Articles)
